Clinicians › Wrist

Distal Radius Fracture

Distal radius fractures — assessment, casting, and indications for surgical fixation.

157 citationsUpdated Oct 2026

For patients: a plain-language version of this topic is available. See the patient guide.

Overview

Distal radius fractures are among the most common injuries presenting to the emergency department, with fracture patterns varying by mechanism of injury [4]. Patients of advanced age with osteoporosis face an increased risk during low-energy falls [4]. The primary goals of treatment are to optimize comfort and function [4]. While current best evidence suggests that initial displacement determines final alignment regardless of immobilization time [4], the optimal treatment method remains without consensus due to a lack of prospective level I or II studies and well-controlled patient trials [8, 16]. Consequently, treatment decisions are largely based on clinician experience [8], and the most recent American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline is unable to make strong recommendations, with nearly two-thirds of categories rated as “inconclusive” or “limited” [25].

Surgical indications relate to infirmity, functional demands, tolerance of deformity, and personal preferences [4]. Operative treatment is generally indicated for most open fractures and volar shearing fractures [4]. Specific characteristics meriting discussion of surgical treatment include loss of reduction (ulnar variance ≥5 mm positive, dorsal articular tilt ≥15°, or loss of radial inclination >10°), an articular gap or step of ≥2 mm, unstable volar extra-articular fractures, and associated neurovascular or intercarpal ligament injuries [4]. Multiple trauma, such as bilateral distal radius fractures or the need for crutches due to leg injury, constitutes a relative indication for surgery [4].

Overall complication rates for distal radius fractures vary widely in the literature, ranging from 6% to 80% [65]. There is no clear evidence of clinical superiority for surgery among older adults at one year, though surgical treatment may yield a faster recovery to previous activity levels [56]. The choice of implant system should be based on the surgeon's familiarity with the design and its limitations [69]. Controversies span the entire spectrum of management, including assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome evaluation [6]. A 2025 guideline provides 27 recommendations addressing clinically relevant issues in adult distal radius fracture treatment [7].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Bony Anatomy

The distal radius articular surface is biconcave, featuring distinct scaphoid and lunate facets [102]. The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) articulates with the ulna at the sigmoid notch [102]. Lister tubercle, a small dorsal prominence, serves as a landmark for the dorsal approach to the wrist and is a cause of attritional rupture of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) following distal radius fracture [102]. The distal radius metaphysis possesses thin cortex, rendering it vulnerable to bending forces [102]. The brachioradialis insertion on the radial styloid acts as a deforming force in distal radius fractures [102]. In a normal wrist with neutral ulnar variance, the distal radius bears 80% of the axial load [102].

The carpus consists of two rows of eight bones that bridge the forearm and hand, providing movement at the wrist joint while retaining stability [34]. The proximal carpal row includes the scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum [34]. The distal carpal row includes the trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, and hamate [34]. The proximal carpal row is referred to as the key intercalated segment between the forearm and the distal row of the carpus [34]. The pisiform bone is a sesamoid bone enclosed within the sheath of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon and should not theoretically be considered part of the proximal carpal row [34]. The trapezium articulates with the first metacarpal, the trapezoid with the second, the capitate with the third, and the hamate with the fourth and fifth metacarpals [34]. The capitate and trapezoid are tightly connected to the metacarpals, whereas there is 30 to 40 degrees of flexion–extension and rotation at the metacarpotrapezial joint [34].

The scaphoid is a small, irregular S-shaped tubular bone located in the proximal carpal row on the radial aspect of the wrist [83]. It lies entirely within the wrist joint at a 45-degree plane to the longitudinal and horizontal axis of the wrist [83]. The scaphoid articulates with the trapezium/trapezoid, radius, capitate, and lunate [83]. Its surface is extensively covered with articular cartilage (over 80%), resulting in reduced capacity for periosteal healing and an increased tendency for delayed union and nonunion [83]. The scaphoid acts as a midcarpal joint “bridge” linking and synchronizing the motions of the proximal and distal carpal rows [83].

Ligamentous Anatomy

The extrinsic ligaments of the carpus connect the carpal bones to the forearm bones proximally and the metacarpals distally [88]. The extrinsic palmar radiocarpal ligaments include the transverse carpal, radioscaphocapitate, radioscapholunate, radial collateral, long radiolunate, and short radiolunate ligaments [88]. The extrinsic ulnocarpal ligaments include the ulnotriquetral, ulnolunate, and ulnocapitate ligaments [88]. Strong oblique extrinsic palmar radial ligaments prevent the carpus from translating medially on the angulated slope of the distal radius through two V-shaped ligamentous bands [88]. The space of Poirier is a V-shaped interligamentous sulcus over the capitolunate articulation representing an interval of capsular weakness [88]. The arcuate ligament is found in the central third of the palmar joint capsule and forms a support sling for the midcarpal region, particularly the head of the capitate [88]. The extrinsic dorsal carpal ligaments include the dorsal radiocarpal ligament and the dorsal intercarpal ligament, which form a V-shaped configuration [88].

The intrinsic ligaments connect individual carpal bones to one another and are intra-articular short fibers [88]. These include the palmar midcarpal ligaments (scaphotrapeziotrapezoid, scaphocapitate, triquetrocapitate, triquetrohamate), proximal interosseous ligaments (scapholunate, lunotriquetral), and distal interosseous ligaments [88]. The scapholunate ligament has dorsal, palmar, and proximal components, with the proximal portion being the widest, thinnest (1 mm), and weakest section [120]. The lunotriquetral ligament has dorsal, palmar, and proximal components, with the palmar bundle being a transverse strong thick bundle of fibers [120]. The radioscaphocapitate ligament originates from the radial styloid at the level of the scaphoid fossa and inserts on the volar capitate [120]. The ulnotriquetral ligament originates from the palmar edge of the TFCC and inserts on the proximal/ulnar surfaces of the triquetrum [120].

Vascular Anatomy

Circulation to the carpus is comprised of an extraosseous and intraosseous vasculature via both dorsal and palmar vascular systems, which are branches of the radial, ulnar, anterior interosseous, and deep palmar arch arteries [105]. The extraosseous arterial supply is formed by an anastomotic network of dorsal and palmar transverse arches connected longitudinally by the radial, ulnar, and anterior interosseous arteries [105]. The three dorsal transverse arches of the carpus include the radiocarpal, intercarpal, and basal metacarpal arches [105]. The three palmar transverse arches of the carpus include the radiocarpal, intercarpal, and deep palmar arches [105].

The vascular supply of the scaphoid arises from two vascular pedicles originating from the scaphoid branches of the radial artery [83]. The dorsal branch enters via foramina along the spiral groove and dorsal ridge, supplying 70% to 80% of the scaphoid proximally, including the proximal pole [83]. The volar branch enters via the scaphoid tubercle and supplies the remaining 20% to 30% of the distal scaphoid [83]. The waist of the scaphoid has minimal or no perforating vasculature [83]. No vessels perforate the proximal dorsal cartilaginous area or through the scapholunate ligament [83]. Proximal scaphoid fractures are associated with at least temporary disruption of the interosseous blood supply to the proximal pole [83].

The scaphoid, capitate, and about 20% of all lunates are supplied by a single vessel, increasing their risk of avascular necrosis [105]. The trapezium, triquetrum, pisiform, and 80% of lunates receive nutrient arteries through two nonarticular surfaces with consistent intraosseous anastomoses, reducing the risk of avascular necrosis [105]. The trapezoid and 50% of hamates lack an intraosseous anastomosis and are at risk of avascular fragments [105].

Normal Radiographic Parameters

Radiographic measurement of an intact distal radius shows an average of 22 to 23 degrees of radial inclination [5]. Radiographic measurement of an intact distal radius shows an average of 11 to 12 mm of radial height [5]. Radiographic measurement of an intact distal radius shows an average of 11 to 12 degrees of volar tilt [5]. Radiographic measurement of an intact distal radius shows ± 2 mm of ulnar variance [5]. Normal wrist alignment parameters include radial inclination of 22 degrees, volar tilt of 11–12 degrees, and radial length of 11–12 mm [43]. The "11:11:22 rule" defines normal radial height as 11 mm, volar tilt as 11 degrees, and radial inclination as 22 degrees [102]. Both wrists of one individual can be considered symmetrical for palmar tilt, radial inclination, and ulnar variance, making the contralateral wrist a better reference than population data [154].

Pathomechanics and Fracture Patterns

Distal radius fractures occur in a bimodal distribution with peaks for high-energy injuries in young patients and low-energy injuries in elderly patients [50]. The incidence of distal radius fractures in the United States is 643,000 per year [50]. Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures of the upper extremity, with over 300,000 cases per year in the United States [102]. In young patients, distal radius fractures are typically caused by high-energy trauma such as motor vehicle accidents or falls from height [102]. In elderly patients, distal radius fractures are typically caused by low-energy falls and are the most common upper extremity osteoporotic fracture [102].

Colles fracture: A transverse fracture of the radius just above the wrist with dorsal displacement of the distal fragment [14]. It is the most common of all fractures in older women, related to the onset of postmenopausal osteoporosis [14]. Smith fracture: Also known as a reverse Colles fracture, this is a dorsally angulated fracture of the distal radius with the hand and wrist displaced volarly with respect to the forearm [43]. Barton fracture: A fracture-dislocation with an intraarticular fracture in which the carpus and a rim of the distal radius are displaced together [43]. Chauffeur’s fracture: A radial styloid fracture initially described in car drivers operating automobiles that required hand cranking to start [43].

Experimental hyperextension of the wrist can generate dorsal, central, and palmar types of distal radius fractures [245]. As the intensity of the fall-on-outstretched-hand mechanism increases, the percentage of AO type C fractures increases at the expense of type A fractures [273]. The percentage of AO type B fractures remains relatively constant as the intensity of the fall-on-outstretched-hand mechanism increases [273].

Associated Injuries and Instability

Injuries to adjacent soft-tissue structures occur in approximately one-half of distal radius fractures and in almost all intra-articular fractures [134]. The most common associated soft-tissue injuries in distal radius fractures are TFCC, scapholunate ligament, and lunotriquetral ligament injuries, in descending order of frequency [134]. Risk factors for an associated carpal fracture include male sex, young age, high-energy trauma, and AO type B distal radius fractures [134]. Ulnar styloid fractures have been shown in multiple clinical studies to have little influence on functional outcome [134].

The overall incidence of wrist instabilities following distal radial fractures was 60% (164/272 patients) [171]. Dorsal angulation deformities of the distal radius affect the 3-dimensional kinematics of the DRUJ, especially with the TFCC sectioned [157]. Components of carpal bone motion are altered markedly at all positions of dorsal angulation of the distal radius [135]. Impaired function following altered anatomy at the distal radius can be explained by dysfunction of the distal radioulnar joint [112]. All stages of radioulnar instability demonstrate a decrease in the lunate contact area in positions with the forearm in supination [168]. Injury to the dorsal wrist extrinsic carpal ligaments exacerbates volar radiocarpal instability after intra-articular distal radius fracture [166]. Alterations in contact biomechanics could be one reason for the higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis when a deeper central impaction of the distal radius is present [81]. Patients with distal radius fractures exhibit altered scapular kinematics, which may further contribute to the development of secondary musculoskeletal pathologies [80].

Malunion and Deformity Consequences

Malunion remains a common cause of residual disability after distal radial fractures [5]. Not all distal radial malunions are symptomatic, especially in elderly patients with low functional demands [5]. Posttraumatic wrist deformities in younger, active patients may be sufficiently disabling to warrant surgical correction [5]. Malunion is associated with higher arm-related disability regardless of age [5]. Malunion can be caused by failure to achieve or maintain an accurate reduction or by inadequate duration or type of immobilization [5]. Reduction is most difficult to obtain and maintain in fractures with marked comminution, severe osteoporosis, or disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments [5]. Older patients have more malunions than younger patients, with a mean age of 60 years for malunions versus 51 years for non-malunions [5].

Malunions of the distal radius may be associated with extraarticular deformities, intraarticular malalignment, distal radioulnar joint incongruity or instability, or a combination of these features [5]. Intraarticular incongruity in the radiocarpal joint of more than 2 mm is likely to be associated with a poor functional outcome [5]. A 1- to 2-mm step-off at the distal radioulnar joint is likely to be associated with a poor functional outcome [5]. Dorsal angulation of more than 20 degrees and radial inclination of less than 10 degrees are likely to be associated with a poor functional outcome [5]. Loss of sagittal tilt of 20 to 30 degrees is likely to be associated with a poor functional outcome [5]. More than 10 degrees of dorsal tilt leads to decreased wrist flexion [5]. 6 mm of radial shortening causes dysfunction of the distal radioulnar joint [5]. Fractures with more than 25 or 30 degrees of angulation in the frontal or sagittal plane or 6 mm or more of radial shortening are likely to become symptomatic [5]. Patients with constitutional joint laxity may develop midcarpal instability with a dorsal tilt of only 10 to 15 degrees [5]. Significant changes to distal radioulnar joint mechanics and ligament lengthening occur with malunion of the distal radius [5]. 20 to 30 degrees of dorsal tilt alters the force distribution across the radiocarpal joint and should be considered a prearthritic condition [5]. Significant articular incongruity and radial shortening are more consistently correlated with the development of symptoms than other measurements [5].

Malunion occurs commonly in distal radius fractures, particularly in elderly patients managed nonoperatively [31]. A distal radius malunion is defined by radial inclination <10 degrees, volar tilt >20 degrees or dorsal tilt >20 degrees, radial height <10 mm, ulnar variance >2+ mm, or intra-articular incongruity or diastasis >2 mm [31]. Malunion can result in decreased grip strength, limitations in range of motion, pain, and cosmetic deformity [31]. Surgical procedures designed to correct malunions of the distal radius rarely result in a normal wrist [31]. Following corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunion, range of motion and grip strength rarely exceed 70% of the contralateral limb [31].

Classification

Reliability and Limitations of Existing Systems

No single classification system for distal radius fractures is adequate [36]. Existing systems are primarily historical or research tools rather than useful clinical knowledge, owing to poor reproducibility, excessive complexity, and weak correlation with functional outcomes [37]. Contemporary systems have not achieved impressive interobserver agreement and should not be overly relied upon to dictate treatment plans [87]. A 1996 study found low interobserver and intraobserver agreement across classifications, warranting against their use as the sole means for determining treatment direction or comparing results among studies [210]. Poor interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility have been reported for the Frykmann, Melone, Mayo, and Fernandez classifications using plain radiographs [215]. Current pathology-based systems exhibit only moderate or poor reproducibility [182]. Intersurgeon reliability for classifying intraarticular fractures did not improve with the addition of a 3-D model [207]. Numerous systems exist, yet there is no consensus regarding their reliability or value in treatment planning [242].

Specific Classification Systems and Definitions

AO/OTA: The AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification is familiar to orthopaedic surgeons and frequently used in clinical studies [242]. It involves 144 subtypes, making it cumbersome, with decreased reliability upon subtyping [242]. The system has moderate intraobserver and interobserver reliability overall [242]. In a 2016 study, interobserver reliability was substantial for Type A fractures but fair and moderate for Types B and C, respectively [227]. Intra-rater reproducibility was “substantial” for fracture types and “fair” for fracture groups [227]. No statistically significant associations were observed comparing interobserver agreement by level of training, nor differences between subspecialties [227]. Type A fractures are extra-articular (Colles and Smith) [242]. Type B denotes partial articular fractures (volar and dorsal Barton) [242]. Type C includes complete articular fractures where no portion of the articular surface is contiguous with the shaft [242].

Fernandez: The Fernandez classification divides distal radius fractures into five types based on radiographic findings and a presumed mechanism of injury [215]. It provides a separate grouping for possible associated distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) lesions [215]. The system aims to indicate injury severity and prognosis based on the presumed complexity of the bone injury [215].

Other Systems: A 2001 classification attempted to simplify distal radial fractures into five main groups according to the mechanism of injury [45]. A 2026 classification system provides reliable and reproducible classification of extraarticular distal radius fractures with meaningful inter- and intraobserver reliability across all fracture types [47]. A new intra-articular classification proposed in 2024 is based on the affection condition of the volar or dorsal side [213]. A 2019 study redefines a method for classifying intra-articular fractures to provide a clearer understanding of fracture characteristics [96]. The DREAD classification organizes and describes articular fragment escape patterns following fixation to raise awareness and facilitate decision-making [141]. The Soong classification system is based on the position of the implant relative to the watershed line on the volar aspect of the distal radius [235]. In the Soong classification, if the plate location is dorsal to the critical line, it is called Grade 0 [235]. If the plate location is volar to the critical line but proximal to the volar cortex, it is classified accordingly [235].

Eponymous Systems: Eponymous systems such as Colles, Smith, volar Barton, and dorsal Barton impart a large amount of information with few words if used correctly [242]. However, these systems are often used incorrectly (more broadly than intended) and create confusion [242]. They are not comprehensive and do not include all fractures [242].

Epidemiology and Distribution

In a 2018 study of 268 distal radius fractures, Type A (extraarticular) was seen in 43.3% (116/268), Type B (partial articular) in 13.1% (35/268), and Type C (complete articular) in 43.7% (117/268) according to the AO classification [202]. The distribution of AO subtypes was A1 0.7% (2/268), A2 20.5% (55/268), A3 22% (59/268), B1 10.1% (27/268), B3 3% (8/268), C1 7.8% (21/268), C2 12.7% (34/268), and C3 23.1% (62/268) [202]. In a 2010 study of 105 wrists with carpal tunnel syndrome after distal radius fracture, 61 were classified as AO A 1-3, 6 as B 1-3, and 32 as C 1-3 [199]. In this study, 19 of the 28 wrists in the acute onset group were classified as C-type fractures [199]. Thirty-seven of the 47 wrists in the subacute onset group were A-type fractures [199]. Nineteen of the 30 wrists in the delayed onset group were A-type fractures [199].

Clinical Implications and Treatment Guidance

Classification systems serve to categorize injuries, guide treatment, and predict prognosis based on factors like displacement, stability, and articular involvement [36]. Orthopaedic surgeons use these systems as a guide for treatment and prognosis, as well as for comparison of results in clinical studies [215]. Volar and dorsal shear fractures (partial articular, Type B) are inherently unstable [242]. A volar lunate facet fragment must be stabilized [242]. Failure to stabilize the volar lunate facet fragment can lead to volar subluxation of the carpus [242]. The sigmoid notch is important for forearm supination [242]. The dorsal and volar lunate facets are the origins of their respective radioulnar ligaments and play a role in DRUJ stability [242]. When considering comminuted or complex fracture patterns, it may be helpful to consider the wrist as three columns: the radial column (radial styloid and scaphoid facet), the middle column (volar and dorsal lunate facets and sigmoid notch), and the ulnar column (ulnar head and TFCC) [242]. The middle column should be prioritized when considering comminuted or complex fracture patterns [242]. Surgical indications according to AO/ASIF fracture type are presented in a table in the 2024 Orthopaedic Knowledge Update, noting that this classification system was chosen because it is the most commonly reported in the literature and is the most reproducible [242]. There is general agreement on management of Type B fractures according to the AO/ASIF fracture type table [242]. Fractures of Types A2, A3, and C1 are amenable to most treatment options according to the AO/ASIF fracture type table [242]. The complex fracture pattern of an unstable distal radius fracture cannot be treated by a single plate system and approach [226]. Preliminary results from a 2010 study suggest that four homogeneous groups of distal radius fractures may be individualized both in terms of patients and fracture types, which may facilitate future comparison studies [182].

Other Considerations: The injury score system presented in a 1994 study, and in particular, the number of fracture fragments correlated most closely with the outcome of all classification systems examined [151]. Distal radius fracture patients with osteoporosis did not sustain more complex fractures than those with osteopenia/normal BMD according to the AO classification system [153].

Clinical Presentation

History and Mechanism

Patients typically present with a history of a fall onto an outstretched hand [206], although some distal radius fractures result from higher energy injuries [206]. The injury described by Abraham Colles in 1814 is a transverse fracture of the radius just above the wrist with dorsal displacement of the distal fragment [14]. This fracture pattern is the most common of all fractures in older women, with high incidence related to the onset of postmenopausal osteoporosis [14]. History should focus on other areas of pain in the ipsilateral limb to rule out concomitant injury [206].

Physical Examination

Patients present with associated pain, swelling, and often visible deformity at the wrist [206]. The most typical pattern of deformity is dorsal angulation at the distal radius accompanied by compensatory flexion of the carpus, resulting in a "dinner-fork" deformity [206]. This deformity is characterized by prominence on the back of the wrist and a depression in front [14]. In patients with less deformity, there may only be local tenderness and pain on wrist movements [14]. When there is no obvious deformity but clinical suspicion remains high, point tenderness or pain with percussion at the distal radius can aid in diagnosis [206].

Physical examination includes a thorough inspection of the skin to evaluate for open wounds, which most commonly occur on the volar ulnar side [206]. A thorough neurologic examination is required to rule out acute carpal tunnel syndrome [206]. Patients should be asked about numbness or paresthesias to look for median or ulnar nerve injury [206].

Associated Injuries and Complications

Most patients sustain an associated injury, with disruption to the ipsilateral distal radioulnar joint common [40]. Soft-tissue injuries are common concomitants of distal radius fractures and may influence acute management strategies or cause persistent pain and disability despite fracture healing [129]. Ulnar translation of the proximal radius metaphyseal/shaft is a common but typically overlooked and unrecognized component of distal radius fracture deformity [132]. Combined median and ulnar nerve palsy related to distal fractures of the radius are exceedingly rare but require a standardised management strategy [131]. The diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) after distal radius fractures remains largely clinical due to poor sensitivity of imaging and lack of laboratory studies [33].

Prognosis and Outcomes

Men over the age of 65 with a distal radius fracture are more likely to have post-fracture disability regardless of radiographic appearance [22]. A number of patients with nonsurgically treated distal radius fractures still experience some hand/wrist impairment a decade after the trauma [13]. Not all distal radial malunions are symptomatic, especially malunions in elderly patients with low functional demands [5]. In one study, malunion was found to be associated with higher arm-related disability regardless of age [5]. The associations between prognostic factors and persistent pain following a distal radius fracture are unclear [20].

Investigations

Plain radiography: The standard radiographic series for distal radius fractures includes posteroanterior (PA), lateral, and oblique views [149]. Normal parameters include radial inclination of 22 to 23 degrees (range 12 to 30 degrees), volar tilt of 11 to 12 degrees (range 0 to 28 degrees), and radial height of 11 to 12 mm (range 8 to 18 mm) [149]. Radial inclination is measured on the PA view as the angle between a line perpendicular to the radial shaft and a line connecting the distal end of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) to the radial styloid [149]. Volar tilt is measured on a true lateral view as the angle between a line perpendicular to the radial shaft and a line connecting the volar and dorsal rims of the distal radius [149]. Radial height is measured on the PA view as the distance in millimeters between two parallel lines drawn perpendicular to the shaft of the radius, one at the distal end of the ulnar head and the other at the radial styloid [149]. Ulnar variance is measured as the vertical distance between two lines drawn perpendicular to the long axis of the radius, one parallel to the medial corner of the articular surface of the radius and the other parallel to the most distal aspect of the articular surface of the ulnar head [149]. Carpal malalignment is assessed by drawing a line down the long axis of the capitate and a separate line down the long axis of the radius, which should overlap or intersect within the carpus in normal alignment [149]. The teardrop angle is measured on the lateral view as the angle between the radial shaft and the central axis of the teardrop, averaging 70 degrees in normal radii; a teardrop angle less than 45 degrees is associated with articular gap and step-off on CT [149]. Anteroposterior (AP) distance is measured on the lateral view as the distance between the apices of the dorsal and volar rims of the lunate facet [149].

Forearm rotation affects radiographic measurements, with a 5-degree rotational change resulting in a 1.6-degree change in volar tilt on the lateral view [149]. An image taken in pronation can reduce apparent radial length by up to 0.5 mm compared with a neutral rotation view [149]. The dorsal tangential view is obtained by flexing the wrist and positioning the forearm tangential to the C-arm beam to assess for dorsal cortical screw penetration [149]. The radial incline view is taken on the lateral view with the C-arm adjusted to match radial inclination to provide a view of the articular surface of the radius [149]. Substantial variability exists in how radiographic measurements are defined in large clinical studies, suggesting a need for consensus on assessment and interpretation [44]. Providing computed radiographic parameters to orthopedic surgeons may improve the consistency of radiographic judgment and influence clinical decision-making for the treatment of distal radius fractures [258].

An unacceptable radiological reduction is significantly associated with worse patient-reported outcomes in adults with a displaced distal radius fracture [257]. Conversely, adequate radiographic reduction is not necessarily associated with better patient-reported functional outcomes or greater satisfaction in elderly patients with conservatively treated distal radius fractures [280]. For distal radius fractures that were initially nondisplaced or minimally displaced, the overall rate of unacceptable radiographic displacement at 6 weeks was 30% [270]. Clinical and radiological results of early and delayed surgery after loss of reduction in secondary displaced distal radius fractures were similar [32]. Radiographic outcomes decline linearly with increased time to surgery in distal radius fractures [48]. Routine follow-up radiographs for distal radius fractures are seldom clinically substantiated and seldom influence clinical decision making [79]. The value of routine early post-operative radiographs in the management of distal radius fracture fixations is questioned, particularly if the fracture is extra-articular [259]. Optimal postoperative radiographic parameters are essential for successfully obtaining a recovery of wrist function for unstable distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plate fixation [262]. A machine learning model has been developed that accurately predicts 6-week radiographic outcomes in nonsurgically treated distal radius fractures [78].

CT: CT scan is a useful imaging method for initial evaluation and indication of treatment for fractures of the distal end of the radius [55]. CT may be required to better define associated bony injuries in radiocarpal instability [40]. CT is useful in the diagnosis of suspected carpal fractures and assessment of union [122]. Plain x-rays appear to underestimate sigmoid notch involvement following distal radius fractures, revealing extension in only 7 cases (35%) compared to 13 cases (65%) on CT scans [267]. The articular portions of dorsal rim fragments are smaller than indicated by CT [263]. Displaced dorsal rim fragments in dorsally displaced distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plates do not adversely affect wrist clinical outcomes [263]. CT assessments of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) primarily show alterations of alignment and have several risks of bias in patients with a prior distal radius fracture [256]. Both x-ray films and CT scans readily show extension of fracture lines into the radiocarpal joint, radial shaft, and the ulnar styloid [271]. The dorsal ulnar corner and intra-articular free fragment typically require computed tomographic scan for accurate evaluation [265].

MRI: MRI can be used to determine the extent of ligamentous disruption in radiocarpal instability [40]. MRI is useful in detecting suspected fractures and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the carpus [122]. Magnetic resonance imaging using advanced multiparametric sequences may facilitate accurate, noninvasive assessment of articular cartilage changes after distal radius fracture without the need for a contrast agent [146]. MRI is the definitive way to confirm or exclude a diagnosis of scaphoid fracture if the technique is available [24]. Early MRI reduces uncertainty and streamlines care for suspected scaphoid fractures when initial X-rays are normal [19]. Zero echo time (ZTE) MRI provides diagnostic performance comparable to CT for intra-articular distal radius fractures, with high reliability for fracture classification, joint involvement, and treatment decision-making [232].

Ultrasound: Ultrasound scanning provides an additional tool for the detection of carpal ligament injuries [122]. Ultrasound examination after volar plate fixation of comminuted distal radius fractures may detect dorsal screw tip prominence when screw lengths are selected to engage the dorsal cortex [268]. The excellent correlation of postreduction ultrasound findings with radiographic findings allows for the recommendation of ultrasound as a procedure for real-time monitoring of the closed reduction of distal radius fractures [261].

Fluoroscopy: Live/video fluoroscopic evaluation of the wrist can provide diagnostic clarity for dynamic instability [122]. Sensitivities for live/video fluoroscopic evaluation are reported between 86% and 95%, with similar specificity between 80% and 97% for diagnosing scapholunate ligament injury [122]. Three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy can facilitate the detection of intra-articular incongruities in distal radius fractures and may prompt intra-operative revisions [275].

Other Considerations: The diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) after distal radius fractures remains largely clinical [33]. The initial radiograph of a distal radius fracture does not predict a triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury [260]. A radiographic finding of a normalized DRUJ gap on posteroanterior views was the most important predictor to identify DRUJ instability accompanying unstable distal radius fractures [264]. Injuries to the scapholunate and lunotriquetral interosseous ligaments occur in approximately one third of distal radius fractures, but their diagnosis is challenging as plain radiographs are not reliably diagnostic [272]. Persistent neurological deficits after distal radius fractures should prompt early investigation and consideration for structural nerve injury [266]. The Appropriate Use Criteria were developed to help determine the appropriateness of diagnostic decisions and treatment for distal radius fractures using evidence-based information and clinical expertise [2]. Distal radius fractures among men occur at a slightly younger average age than among women, with similar mechanisms of injury and comorbidities, yet fewer men are evaluated with a DXA scan or treated for bone mineral density abnormalities [46].

Treatment

General Principles and Guidelines

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria were developed to guide diagnostic and treatment decisions for distal radius fractures using evidence-based information and clinical expertise [2]. These criteria provide appropriateness ratings for 216 patient scenarios to improve the quality and efficiency of care [64]. The 2025 evidence-based guidelines offer 27 recommendations addressing clinically relevant issues in adult distal radius fracture treatment [7], while the AAOS/ASSH Clinical Practice Guideline contains seven recommendations for managing acute distal radius fractures [26]. Despite these frameworks, optimal treatment remains controversial and requires individualized selection based on fracture pattern, injury mechanism, soft-tissue injury, patient characteristics, and surgeon preference [183]. No unanimous consensus or evidence-based routine treatments currently exist [59], and well-controlled patient trials are still missing to lend objective findings to management algorithms [16]. The choice of a particular implant system should be based on the surgeon's familiarity with the implant design and its limitations [69]. Substantial heterogeneity and lack of standardization in outcome measures within level I and II randomized controlled trials limit the ability to compare treatments [15]. A unified system to measure critical facets of recovery would improve the prediction of objective and subjective outcomes [17]. Treatment continues to progress toward personalized medicine, aiming to provide the right treatment for each patient [38].

Non-Operative

Nonoperative treatment remains the most common form of management, though significant functional deficiencies correlate with poor reductions [49]. Nonsurgical treatment should be considered first [142]. Current best evidence suggests that initial displacement determines final alignment regardless of immobilization duration; therefore, wrist splints or short arm casts are usually used, leaving the elbow and forearm free unless severe radioulnar joint injury is present [4]. Patients must be encouraged to elevate the limb, perform digital range of motion, and use the limb functionally to avoid stiffness and limit swelling [4]. For undisplaced fractures, a dorsal splint is applied for 1–2 days until swelling resolves, after which the cast is completed [14]. Stable fractures typically allow cast removal after 4 weeks to permit mobilization [14]. Displaced fractures require reduction under anaesthesia, such as haematoma block, Bier’s block, or axillary block [14]. Reduction involves grasping the hand, applying traction to disimpact fragments, and pushing the distal fragment into place by pressing on the dorsum while manipulating the wrist into moderate flexion, ulnar deviation, and pronation [14]. If satisfactory, a dorsal plaster slab extending from just below the elbow to the metacarpal necks is applied [14]. Immobilization in 20 degrees of flexion and ulnar deviation is adequate, but extreme positions must be avoided [14]. The arm is kept elevated for one or two days, with shoulder and finger exercises started as soon as possible [14]. If fingers become swollen, cyanosed, or painful, the bandage should be split immediately [14]. Position must be checked by X-ray at 7 and 14 days [14]. Later collapse is common; if the fracture redisplaces in the cast, remanipulation usually fails and surgery is considered [14]. Union typically occurs in about 5 weeks, at which point the slab may be discarded and exercises begun even without radiological proof of union [14]. With Colles’ fractures, excessive flexion in plaster must be avoided [14].

In minimally displaced fractures, prospective trials show no significant difference between cast and splint immobilization [203]. AAOS guidelines deem removable wrist splints acceptable for nondisplaced fractures [203]. Patients using prefabricated splints are instructed to wear them except for personal hygiene, and providing two splints is ideal to allow alternation and washing [203]. Therapy-fabricated custom orthoses are preferred by some but entail increased cost [203]. For displaced metaphyseal fractures, closed reduction is performed with conscious sedation or analgesia and an associated hematoma block if facility capability allows [203]. Although above-elbow and below-elbow methods maintain reduction, a molded sugar tong splint is preferred to maintain postreduction alignment [203]. Following closed reduction, patients require close follow-up with serial radiographs to evaluate for displacement, which decreases substantially after the first 2 weeks [203]. Patients undergoing nonoperative treatment must be counseled about the risk of spontaneous extensor pollicis longus rupture [203]. Nondisplaced fractures appear inherently stable and may be treated with only an initial radiograph and a follow-up at six weeks when the cast is removed [219]. Volar cortical integrity predicts successful maintenance of reduction in non-surgically managed fractures [193], though further well-designed prognosis studies are needed to delineate predictors of loss of reduction [52].

Nonoperative treatment yields satisfactory outcomes, especially in patients with low functional demands [161]. For displaced fractures, adequate closed reduction leads to acceptable functional outcomes after 12 months, albeit with a 40% rate of subsequent surgeries [170]. Short-term serious adverse events are rare after non-surgical treatment [18], and most patients do not receive opioids [211]. Nonsurgical treatment is associated with greater visible deformity, but symptoms and disability improve over a year and are no different on average than surgical results [188]. Extraarticular fractures without notable deformity, intraarticular fractures with minimal displacement, and fractures in low-demand patients may be effectively treated with reduction and casting [188]. Most elderly patients choose nonsurgical treatment [188], while healthier, more active patients are more likely to choose surgery [188]. Patients choosing nonsurgical treatment are placed in an orthosis for 2 weeks to allow swelling to subside before changing to a below-elbow cast [188]. Total immobilization lasts 6 weeks, after which patients receive a removable wrist orthosis and stretching exercises [188]. Most elderly patients with displaced distal radius fractures can be treated nonoperatively [189]. Cast immobilization is non-inferior to volar locking plates regarding QuickDASH scores after one year in patients aged 65 years and older [189]. There is no clear evidence of clinical superiority for surgery among older adults at one year, although surgical treatment may yield faster recovery to previous activity levels [56]. Multiple clinical studies document equivalent patient-reported outcomes with cast treatment despite high rates of malunion and diminished grip strength in elderly patients [62]. A 2016 meta-analysis showed no difference in outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical treatment in patients older than 60 years [62]. Restoration of radiographic parameters does not necessarily translate into improved functional outcome in patients older than 60 years [62]. In a prospective cohort of 129 patients older than 55 years, ulnar positivity >2 mm was associated with worse patient-reported outcomes at 1 year regardless of treatment type [62]. Shortening of >5 mm weakens the wrist and substantially limits rotation in elderly patients [62]. Patients must be aware of the expected cosmetic deformity associated with malunion [62]. The treating surgeon must personalize care and not rely on specific measurements when offering treatment options for elderly patients [62]. Subjective outcome improves over time for patients with inferior results at 1 year, but more than half continue to have major disability [21]. Outcome studies should take hand dominance into account [3]. Increasing BMI does not change clinical practice regarding failure of nonoperative treatment but leads to more complex fractures [228]. Patients receiving bisphosphonates at the time of fracture had clinical outcomes similar to those not receiving antiresorptive treatment [51].

Operative

Indications: Surgery is indicated for unstable fractures, defined by criteria predictive of instability, inadequate initial closed reduction, or loss of reduction during follow-up [62]. Other indications include open fractures, certain associated injuries, and high-energy injuries in young patients [62]. Injury and patient characteristics meriting surgical discussion include loss of reduction with ulnar variance 5 mm or more positive, dorsal articular tilt ≥15° (volar apex angulation), and loss of radial inclination >10° [4]. An articular gap or step of 2 mm or more also merits surgical discussion [4]. Unstable volar extra-articular fractures (Smith fracture), fractures with associated neurovascular injuries, and fractures with associated intercarpal ligament injuries are additional indications [4]. The presence of three or more factors before reduction—dorsal comminution, dorsal angulation >20°, ulnar styloid fracture, intra-articular extension, and age older than 60 years—is predictive of secondary displacement after closed reduction [62]. AAOS guidelines recommend surgery for postreduction radial shortening >3 mm, dorsal tilt >10°, or intra-articular displacement or step-off >2 mm [62]. A 2020 meta-analysis showed that median term DASH scores and grip strength favored surgical treatment, although there was no difference for patients older than 60 years [62]. Age 65 serves as a proxy for functional activity, under which patients are likely to benefit from surgical fixation and over which they are less likely to benefit compared with nonsurgical treatment [173].

Surgical Approach / Technique: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with or without external fixation is a treatment option for distal radius fractures [4]. This technique is appropriate for 2- and 3-part fractures of the distal radial metaphysis, but severe comminution is a contraindication [125]. Performed for nearly a century, the technique remains a good option for surgical management [246]. It requires little equipment and is minimally invasive [246]. It is most effective for unstable extra-articular or minimally articular fractures but becomes more challenging with comminuted fractures [246]. The technique is reserved for skeletally immature patients and those without significant comminution or intra-articular involvement [246]. A large intra-articular radial styloid fracture can be managed well with percutaneous wires, but they are avoided in other more complicated fractures [246]. No difference has been shown between techniques or the number of pins in percutaneous pinning studies [246]. Similarly, no difference has been shown between intrafocal or extrafocal pinning [246].

The procedure is best performed under sterile conditions with the patient supine, arm abducted on an arm board or hand table, preferably under regional blockade [246]. Reduction may be performed and checked on fluoroscopy to confirm feasibility prior to proceeding [246]. If complete reduction is not possible, intrafocal pins can be used to complete the reduction [246]. Pins may be placed in many configurations so long as penetration of the articular surface is avoided [246]. Common configurations include pins across the fracture, from radius to ulna, or intrafocal [246]. A combination of types may be used, with starting points including the radial aspect of the fragment from the styloid to the fracture or the dorsal aspect of the radius [246]. Intrafocal pins are started in the fracture site and used as reduction tools—the Kapandji technique—before being driven into the radial shaft proximal to the fracture site [246]. Care must be taken to avoid the radial sensory nerve, which courses over the radial styloid, as well as the extensor tendons [246]. For radial styloid pins, this is accomplished by identifying the radial styloid at the bony prominence just proximal to the anatomic snuffbox at the level of the wrist, making a small incision over the styloid, and bluntly dissecting down to bone to protect the radial sensory nerve [246]. Blunt dissection can also be used to protect tendons dorsally at the desired wire entry point [246].

Implant Selection: It is widely accepted that at least two pins should be used, and many surgeons use three or more, but no studies have specifically compared the number of pins used [246]. One study found that a construct of two radial styloid pins and one dorsal ulnar pin is the strongest biomechanically, though this has not been studied clinically [246]. Regardless of the construct, at least 1.6-mm (0.062 in.) K-wires should be used [246]. The pin starts in the lateral aspect of the radius distal to the fracture site and within approximately 1 cm of the tip of the styloid [246]. The pin is then directed proximally and ulnarly until it pierces the ulnar-sided cortex of the radius [246]. It should be centered within the radius in the sagittal plane [246].

Other Considerations: Strong evidence suggests no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes by fixation technique used after 3 months, so fixation technique should be driven by fracture pattern [173]. Supervised therapy and arthroscopic assistance should be used sparingly and on a case-by-case basis [173]. Routine radiographs should also be used on a case-by-case basis [173].

Complications

General Complication Rates: Reported complication frequencies for distal radius fracture treatment range from 6% to 80% [30]. Comparative observational studies indicate that complication frequencies do not differ among treatment modalities, though these findings are less robust against potential unmeasured confounders [204]. Specific patient populations face elevated risks: patients with remote injuries have a 6-fold increased risk of complications [194], elderly patients undergoing surgery experience higher complication rates than those treated nonsurgically [197], and patients with HIV are at increased risk for fracture and more likely to experience adverse events following both closed and open management [240].

Nerve Injury: Carpal tunnel syndrome is one of the most common complications, presenting acutely, subacutely, or delayed up to 25 years [30]. Acute carpal tunnel syndrome is characterized by progressive pain and neurologic symptoms in the median nerve distribution and necessitates urgent surgical release [30]. In contrast, median nerve contusion is not progressive and improves over time [30]. Ulnar nerve injury is much less common and is most often a neuropraxia that resolves spontaneously; however, exploration may be warranted in the setting of open injuries or complete ulnar palsy [30].

Tendon Injury: The flexor pollicis longus is the most common tendon to rupture following volar plate application, typically due to volar extension of the plate beyond the watershed line, which causes the tendon to rub directly against the plate edge [4]. A potential pitfall of volar locking plates is application to inappropriate fracture patterns with prominent implant placement, which may lead to tendon rupture [4].

Malunion: Reduction is most difficult to obtain and maintain in fractures with marked comminution (especially involving the articular surface), severe osteoporosis, or disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments [5]. Older patients have higher malunion rates, with a mean age of 60 years for patients with malunions compared to 51 years for those without [5]. Radiographic parameters associated with poor functional outcome include intraarticular incongruity in the radiocarpal joint of more than 2 mm, a 1- to 2-mm step-off at the distal radioulnar joint, dorsal angulation of more than 20 degrees, radial inclination of less than 10 degrees, and loss of sagittal tilt of 20 to 30 degrees [5]. More than 10 degrees of dorsal tilt leads to decreased wrist flexion, and 6 mm of radial shortening causes dysfunction of the distal radioulnar joint [5]. Fractures with more than 25 or 30 degrees of angulation in the frontal or sagittal plane or 6 mm or more of radial shortening are likely to become symptomatic [5]. Laboratory studies show that 20 to 30 degrees of dorsal tilt alters force distribution across the radiocarpal joint, constituting a prearthritic condition [5]. Significant articular incongruity and radial shortening are more consistently correlated with symptom development than other measurements [5]. One study reported significant changes to distal radioulnar joint mechanics and ligament lengthening with malunion, contributing to associated dysfunction [5].

Malunion Management: Most surgeons agree that treatment of malunion should focus on the symptomatic patient rather than radiographic appearance [31]. Some authors argue that early treatment may be warranted in cases of intra-articular malunion before evidence of degeneration appears [31]. A recent definition of distal radius malunion includes radial inclination <10 degrees, volar tilt >20 degrees or dorsal tilt >20 degrees, radial height <10 mm, ulnar variance >2+ mm, and intra-articular incongruity or diastasis >2 mm [31]. Malunion can result in decreased grip strength, limitations in range of motion, pain, and unacceptable cosmetic deformity [31]. The timing of operative intervention for clinically determined symptomatic malunion remains controversial [31]. More recent data support intervention as early as 6 weeks, resulting in a technically less challenging case and a shorter overall period of patient disability [31]. Compared to the contralateral limb, deficits are often still appreciated after corrective osteotomy, particularly regarding range of motion and grip strength, which rarely exceeds 70% of the contralateral limb [31].

Nonunion: Nonunion after distal radius fracture is rare, serious, and unpredictable [42].

Distal Radioulnar Joint (DRUJ) Complications: Subacute DRUJ subluxation may occur early, typically under 2 weeks after the original injury, and is easily overlooked [74]. Conservative and operative treatments provided similar long-term outcomes for acute DRUJ instability with distal radius fracture [29]. Distal radius fractures involving the intermediate column had an adverse effect on forearm rotation after conservative treatment [216].

Long-Term Functional Outcomes: Recovery after a distal radius fracture is an ongoing process that lasts years [67].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): The evidence does not specify a distinct week-range for light activity milestones such as desk work or driving. However, subacute distal radioulnar joint subluxation may occur early, typically under 2 weeks after the original injury, and is easily overlooked [74].

Full activity (months): Severe symptoms subside within the first two months, with the majority of patients expected to have minimal pain and disability by six months [284]. Functional outcomes are restored a decade after a distal radius fracture [67].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Recovery from distal radius fracture is best described by three trajectories: rapid-recovery (69%), slow-recovery (23%), and non-recovery (8%) [283].

Rehabilitation protocol: The provided evidence does not detail specific physiotherapy phasing, immobilisation durations, or weight-bearing progressions.

Functional milestones: Conservative treatment of distal radius fractures produced an increase in upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up [147]. On average, patients undergoing operative treatment of type B and type C articular fractures of the distal radius have similar impairment, symptoms, and disability in the long-term [174]. The presence of an associated ulnar styloid fracture resulted in a slower recovery of grip strength and wrist flexion, though no long-term differences in measured impairments were observed [165]. Early surgery is associated with improved long-term Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores [184].

Other Considerations: Malunion has a negative impact on a wide range of daily activities and other aspects of daily life [196]. Malunion was found to be associated with higher arm-related disability regardless of age [5]. Older patients had more malunions, with a mean age of 60 years for patients with malunions compared to 51 years for those without [5]. Twenty to 30 degrees of dorsal tilt altered the force distribution across the radiocarpal joint and should be considered a prearthritic condition [5].

An increase in age and a decrease in BMD were important risk factors influencing delayed functional recovery up to 12 months after distal radius fracture surgery [186]. Fracture severity and high-energy trauma were associated with decreased functional outcomes up to 6 months after surgery [186]. A delay in time-to-surgery greater than two weeks for distal radius fractures may be associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes [184]. Depression affects the recovery trajectories of patients with distal radius fractures [283].

Treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with a variable-angle volar locking plate resulted in excellent clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up [54]. After a 2-year follow-up period, the use of an angle stable implant for unstable distal radius fractures provides adequate fixation with minimal loss of reduction [192]. No significant differences in radiographic outcomes or complication rates were found between patients with delayed versus early surgical treatment for distal radius fracture [66]. The conservative and operative treatments provided similar long-term outcomes for acute distal radioulnar joint instability with distal radius fracture [29]. Operative treatment of distal radius fracture led more often to longer time lost from work than conservative treatment [269]. Distal radius fractures with displacement up to 25 to 30 degrees can remodel spontaneously in skeletally immature patients, making surgical treatment seldom indicated [76]. As of 24 months after surgery for an irreducible distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture, bone fusion has been achieved in both the radius and ulna without distal radioulnar joint impairment [285].

Key Evidence

• [L3] Some outcomes after distal radius fracture differ between age and fracture type groups. [1] (10.1016/j.jht.2022.11.002)
• [L5] The Appropriate Use Criteria were developed to help determine the appropriateness of diagnostic decisions and treatment for distal radius fractures using evidence-based information and clinical expertise. [2] (10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00139)
• [L4] The practical implication is that outcome studies for the treatment of distal radius fractures should take hand dominance into account. [3] (10.1016/s0363-5023(00)70027-x)
• [L5] Controversies span the entire spectrum of management of distal radius fractures, including assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of outcomes. [6] (10.5435/jaaos-22-09-566)
• [Paper] This guideline provides 27 recommendations addressing the most clinically relevant issues in the treatment of adult distal radius fractures. [7] (10.1016/j.injury.2025.112449)
• [L4] This evidence-based review incorporates current and available literature regarding distal radius fractures, highlighting that treatment decisions are largely based on clinician experience due to a lack of prospective level I or II studies. [8] (10.1016/j.ocl.2017.12.001)
• [L4] Adverse events are incompletely reported among RCTs cited as supporting evidence for American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of distal radius fractures. [9] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.008)
• [L4] Pinning is an efficacious, low-cost treatment option for 2- and 3-part distal radius fractures with excellent long-term results. [12] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.08.002)
• [L4] A number of patients with nonsurgically treated distal radius fractures still experience some hand/wrist impairment a decade after the trauma. [13] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.019)
• [L1] There is substantial heterogeneity and lack of standardization in the collection of both objective outcome measures and PROMs in level I and II RCTs for the treatment of distal radius fractures. [15] (10.1177/15589447211028919)
• [L4] Despite the frequency of distal radius fractures, the optimal treatment remains without consensus opinion, with well-controlled patient trials still missing to lend objective findings to management algorithms. [16] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.001)
• [L5] A unified system to measure the critical facets of recovery after distal radius fracture injury would improve the ability to compare treatments and predict objective and subjective outcomes. [17] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.02.001)
• [L3] Short-term serious adverse events (SAEs) were rare after non-surgical treatment for distal radius fracture (DRF). [18] (10.1186/s12891-026-10037-2)
• [L1] The associations between prognostic factors and persistent pain following a distal radius fracture are unclear. [20] (10.1177/17589983221124973)
• [L2] The subjective outcome after a distal radius fracture improves over time for patients with an inferior result at 1 year, but more than half of the patients continue to have major disability. [21] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.015)
• [L3] Men over the age of 65 with a distal radius fracture are more likely to have post-fracture disability regardless of radiographic appearance. [22] (10.1186/s12891-020-03843-9)
• [L1] The guideline contains seven recommendations to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians managing patients with acute distal radius fractures based on the best current available evidence. [26] (10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00719)
• [L1] The conservative and operative treatments provided similar long-term outcomes for acute DRUJ instability with distal radius fracture. [29] (10.1097/sap.0000000000000663)
• [L4] Clinical and radiological results of early and delayed surgery after loss of reduction in secondary displaced distal radius fractures were similar. [32] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.006)
• [L5] The diagnosis of CRPS after distal radius fractures remains largely clinical due to poor sensitivity of imaging and lack of laboratory studies. [33] (10.1016/j.hcl.2021.02.013)
• [L5] The article reviews the evolution of classification systems for distal radius fractures, noting that while no single system is adequate, they serve to categorize injuries, guide treatment, and predict prognosis based on factors like displacement, stability, and articular involvement. [36] (10.1016/j.hcl.2009.08.003)
• [L4] Existing classification systems for adult distal radius fractures are not useful clinical knowledge but mainly historical and/or research tools due to poor reproducibility, excessive complexity, and weak correlation with functional outcomes. [37] (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01212)
• [L5] Treatment of distal radius fracture continues to progress, with diagnostic and therapeutic innovations and assessment of results in terms of function and complications, in a perspective of personalized medicine: the right treatment for each patient. [38] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.007)
• [L4] The indication for using the intramedullary nail should continue to be limited to extra-articular and simple intra-articular distal radius fractures until additional data can be obtained. [41] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.004)
• [L4] Nonunion after distal radius fracture is rare, serious and unpredictable. [42] (10.1016/j.hansur.2016.03.012)
• [L4] Substantial variability in how radiographic measurements are defined in large clinical studies suggest a need for consensus on the assessment and interpretations of radiographic measures used in patients following a distal radius fracture. [44] (10.1007/s11552-015-9772-9)
• [L5] The author has attempted to simplify the classification of distal radial fractures into five main groups according to the mechanism of injury. [45] (10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00067-1)
• [L4] Distal radius fractures among men occur at a slightly younger average age than among women, with similar mechanisms of injury and comorbidities, yet fewer men are evaluated with a DXA scan or treated for bone mineral density abnormalities. [46] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.009)
• [L4] This classification system provides reliable and reproducible classification of extraarticular DRFs with meaningful inter- and intraobserver reliability across all fracture types. [47] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2026.02.009)
• [L3] These findings emphasize the importance of prompt surgical intervention for distal radial fractures to achieve optimal radiographic results. [48] (10.1177/17531934251379171)
• [L5] Nonoperative treatment remains the most common form of treatment for distal radius fractures, though significant functional deficiencies are correlated with poor reductions. [49] (10.1016/j.hcl.2009.08.012)
• [L2] Patients receiving bisphosphonates at the time of distal radius fracture had clinical outcomes similar to those not receiving antiresorptive treatment. [51] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.09.006)
• [L3] Further well-designed prognosis studies are needed to better delineate the predictors of loss of reduction with nonoperative management of distal radius fractures. [52] (10.2106/jbjs.rvw.26.00052)
• [L5] There are few comparative trials to compare outcome measures when discussing distal radius fracture management, and there is no universally accepted gold standard to evaluate recovery. [53] (10.1016/j.hcl.2012.03.003)
• [L4] Treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with a VAVLP resulted in excellent clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up. [54] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.116)
• [L4] CT scan showed to be a useful imaging method, besides the use of radiography, for initial evaluation and also for indication of the treatment of fractures of the distal end of the radius. [55] (10.1177/1558944716660555bj)
• [L2] There is no clear evidence of the clinical superiority of distal radius fracture surgery among older adults at one year, although surgical treatment may yield a faster recovery to previous level of activity. [56] (10.1302/2058-5241.5.190060)
• [Paper] The best method of treatment for distal radius fractures has yet to be found, as there is a multitude of treatment options available with varying degrees of evidence to support their use. [57] (10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.030)
• [L5] Additional indications may be other types of distal radius fractures with articular surface depression. [58] (10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.010)
• [L5] The anthology summarizes current trends regarding fracture classification, treatment indications, surgical techniques, and complications to assist treating surgeons in decision-making, though no unanimous consensus or evidence-based routine treatments currently exist for distal radius fractures. [59] (10.1007/s00402-020-03366-x)
• [L5] External fixation remains a valid treatment option for distal radius fractures, with indications largely unchanged despite the popularity of volar plate fixation. [60] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.09.009)
• [L3] Agreement with AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria increased for operatively treated distal radius fractures after adoption but not for nonoperatively treated fractures. [63] (10.1177/1558944720975147)
• [L1] The Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures developed appropriateness treatment ratings for 216 patient scenarios to guide qualified physicians through treatment decisions and improve the quality and efficiency of care. [64] (10.5435/00124635-201003000-00007)
• [L3] The overall complication rates for distal radius fractures vary widely in the literature, ranging from 6% to 80%. [65] (10.1053/jhsu.2001.26662)
• [L3] We did not find significant differences in radiographic outcomes or complication rates between patients with delayed versus early surgical treatment for distal radius fracture. [66] (10.1177/1558944720930301)
• [L2] Recovery after a distal radius fracture is an ongoing process that lasts years. [67] (10.1177/17531934231194682)
• [L5] The clinical superiority of a particular treatment modality for distal radius fractures remains without consensus, and the choice of a particular implant system should be based on the surgeon's familiarity with the implant design and its limitations. [69] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.05.015)
• [L4] Subacute DRUJ subluxation after a distal radius fracture may occur early, typically under 2 weeks after the original injury and is easily overlooked. [74] (10.1177/17531934241308137)
• [L4] Distal radius fractures with displacement up to 25 to 30 degrees can remodel spontaneously in skeletally immature patients, making surgical treatment seldom indicated. [76] (10.1055/s-0036-1597089)
• [L4] This study developed an ML model that accurately predicts 6-week radiographic outcomes in nonsurgically treated distal radius fractures. [78] (10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01150)
• [Paper] Although it is common practice to routinely take radiographs during follow-up for distal radius fractures, the current results suggest that these radiographs seldom influence clinical decision making. [79] (10.1007/s00402-017-2743-6)
• [L3] Patients with distal radius fractures exhibit altered scapular kinematics, which may further contribute to the development of secondary musculoskeletal pathologies. [80] (10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.12.015)
• [L3] Alterations in contact biomechanics could be one reason for the higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis when a deeper central impaction of the distal radius is present. [81] (10.1007/s00402-013-1787-5)
• [L5] Contemporary classification systems for distal radius fractures have not achieved impressive interobserver agreement and should not be overly relied upon in dictating treatment plans. [87] (10.1016/j.hcl.2007.03.003)
• [L4] This study redefines a new method for the classification of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius, which allows doctors to have a clearer understanding of the characteristics of distal radius fractures. [96] (10.1007/s11547-019-01025-9)
• [L3] Impaired function following altered anatomy at the distal radius can be explained by dysfunction of the distal radioulnar joint. [112] (10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80134-4)
• [L4] The technique is appropriate for 2- and 3-part fractures of the distal radial metaphysis but severe comminution is a contraindication. [125] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.005)
• [L5] Soft-tissue injuries are common concomitants of distal radius fractures and may influence acute management strategies or cause persistent pain and disability despite fracture healing. [129] (10.1016/j.hcl.2012.03.005)
• [Paper] Combined median and ulnar nerve palsy related to distal fractures of the radius are exceedingly rare but require a standardised management strategy. [131] (10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.026)
• [Paper] Ulnar translation of the proximal radius metaphyseal/shaft is a common but typically overlooked and unrecognized component of distal radius fracture deformity. [132] (10.1097/bth.0b013e31817d54e8)
• [L5] Components of carpal bone motion were altered markedly at all positions of dorsal angulation of the distal radius. [135] (10.1053/jhsu.2002.32083)
• [L5] The DREAD classification organizes and describes articular fragment escape patterns following distal radius fracture fixation to raise awareness and facilitate decision-making. [141] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.018)
• [L1] Nonsurgical treatment for the distal radius fractures should be considered firstly. [142] (10.1007/s00402-020-03487-3)
• [L4] Magnetic resonance imaging using advanced multiparametric sequences may facilitate accurate, noninvasive assessment of articular cartilage changes after distal radius fracture without the need for a contrast agent. [146] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.02.009)
• [L3] Conservative treatment of distal radius fractures produced an increase in upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up. [147] (10.1177/1558944717708025)
• [L4] The injury score system presented here and, in particular, the number of fracture fragments correlated most closely with the outcome of all classification systems examined. [151] (10.1016/0363-5023(94)90028-0)
• [L3] Distal radius fracture patients with osteoporosis did not sustain more complex fractures than those with osteopenia/normal BMD according to the AO classification system. [153] (10.1186/s12891-020-03842-w)
• [L4] We conclude that both wrists of one individual can be considered as symmetrical for the tested parameters and that the contralateral wrist provides a better reference than population data. [154] (10.1016/s0266-7681(00)80005-4)
• [L5] Dorsal angulation deformities of the distal radius affect the 3-dimensional kinematics of the DRUJ, especially with the TFCC sectioned. [157] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.013)
• [L4] Nonoperative treatment of distal radius fractures yields satisfactory outcome, especially in those with low functional demands. [161] (10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0019)
• [L2] No long-term differences in measured impairments were observed, but the presence of an associated ulnar styloid fracture resulted in a slower recovery of grip strength and wrist flexion. [165] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.032)
• [L5] Injury to the dorsal wrist extrinsic carpal ligaments exacerbates volar radiocarpal instability. [166] (10.1177/1558944719851210)
• [L5] All stages of radioulnar instability demonstrated a decrease in the lunate contact area in positions with the forearm in supination. [168] (10.1016/0363-5023(90)90144-g)
• [L4] Non-operative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures after adequate closed reduction confirmed on radiograph leads to acceptable functional outcomes after 12 months, however, at the expense of 40% subsequent surgeries. [170] (10.1016/j.otsr.2017.01.017)
• [L3] The overall incidence of wrist instabilities was 60% (164/272 patients). [171] (10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80135-6)
• [L5] [173] (10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01194)
• [L3] On average, patients undergoing operative treatment of type B and type C articular fractures of the distal radius have similar impairment, symptoms, and disability in the long-term. [174] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.027)
• [L4] [182] (10.1016/j.main.2010.07.005)
• [L4] Optimal treatment for distal radius fractures remains controversial and requires individualized selection based on fracture pattern, injury mechanism, soft-tissue injury, patient characteristics, and surgeon preference. [183] (10.5435/jaaos-d-20-01335)
• [L4] A delay in time-to-surgery greater than two weeks for distal radius fractures may be associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes, with early surgery associated with improved long-term Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. [184] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.018)
• [L2] An increase in age and a decrease in BMD were important risk factors influencing delayed functional recovery up to 12 months after distal radius fracture surgery, whereas fracture severity and high-energy trauma were associated with decreased functional outcomes up to 6 months after surgery. [186] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.033)
• [L5] [188] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.001)
• [L1] Most elderly patients with displaced distal radius fractures can be treated nonoperatively. [189] (10.1302/0301-620x.103b2.bjj-2020-2562)
• [L4] After a 2-year follow-up period, the use of an angle stable implant for unstable distal radius fractures provides adequate fixation with minimal loss of reduction. [192] (10.1097/bot.0b013e3181f2b09e)
• [L3] We were able to confirm the importance of volar cortical integrity as a predictor of successful maintenance of reduction in non-surgically managed distal radius fractures. [193] (10.1142/s2424835520500228)
• [L3] Patients with remote injuries have a 6-fold increased risk of complications after distal radius fracture treatment. [194] (10.1177/1558944718798838)
• [L4] The malunion of a distal radius fracture has a negative impact on a wide range of daily activities, as well as other aspects of daily life. [196] (10.1080/09638288.2018.1561954)
• [L3] Elderly patients with distal radius fractures who underwent surgery had higher complication rates than those treated nonsurgically. [197] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.018)
• [L4] [199] (10.1007/s00776-010-1496-7)
• [L3] There are tradeoffs in outcomes after treating patients older than 60 years with closed extraarticular distal radius fractures with casting or surgery. [201] (10.1097/corr.0000000000001865)
• [L4] [202] (10.1007/s00068-018-1023-7)
• [Paper] [203] (10.1016/j.hcl.2021.02.003)
• [L2] Complication frequencies did not differ among different distal radius fracture treatment modalities, but the observed complication frequencies from most comparative observational studies were less robust against potential unmeasured confounders. [204] (10.1097/corr.0000000000002528)
• [L2] Intersurgeon reliability for evaluating the characteristics of and classifying intraarticular distal radius fractures did not improve with an additional 3-D model. [207] (10.1097/corr.0000000000001356)
• [L1] There is no single best option for the treatment of distal radius fractures in older adults across all domains. [208] (10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01160)
• [L4] Given the low degree of interobserver and intraobserver agreement for each of the distal radius fracture classifications in this study, their use as the sole means for determining the direction of treatment or for the direct comparison of results among different studies is not warranted. [210] (10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80006-2)
• [L2] Most patients with nonsurgical distal radius fractures did not receive opioids. [211] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100759)
• [L3] A new intra-articular distal radius fractures classification was proposed based on the affection condition of volar or dorsal side. [213] (10.1186/s12891-024-08215-1)
• [L5] The inclusion of this approach enables surgeons to safely manage distal radius fractures regardless of their direction of instability, facilitating better anatomic results and expedited return to function. [214] (10.1097/00130911-200112000-00004)
• [L4] [215] (10.1177/1753193408101667)
• [L3] Distal radius fractures involving the intermediate column had an adverse effect on forearm rotation after distal radius fractures treated conservatively. [216] (10.1186/s13018-019-1155-4)
• [L3] Nondisplaced distal radius fractures appear to be inherently stable, and it may be appropriate to treat this subset of distal radius fractures with only an initial radiograph at injury and another at six weeks when the cast is removed. [219] (10.1016/s0363-5023(10)60105-0)
• [L5] No single classification system is adequate; instead, various systems categorize injuries to guide treatment based on expected outcome, fracture displacement, stability, and associated injuries. [222] (10.1016/j.ocl.2007.01.002)
• [L4] The complex fracture pattern of an unstable distal radius fracture cannot be treated by a single plate system and approach. [226] (10.1097/bot.0b013e318059b993)
• [L3] [227] (10.1055/s-0036-1587316)
• [L3] Increasing BMI does not change clinical practice regarding failure of nonoperative treatment but leads to more complex distal radius fractures. [228] (10.1177/1558944717750915)
• [L3] ZTE MRI provides diagnostic performance comparable to CT for intra-articular distal radius fractures, with high reliability for fracture classification, joint involvement, and treatment decision-making. [232] (10.1016/j.injury.2025.112846)
• [L3] [235] (10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104172)
• [L2] Patients with HIV are at increased risk for fracture, and they are more likely to experience adverse events following both closed and open management of distal radius fractures. [240] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.12.017)
• [L5] [245] (10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00078-0)
• [L3] Although CT assessments are objective, CT scans primarily show alterations of DRUJ alignment and have several risks of bias in patients with a prior distal radius fracture. [256] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.017)
• [L1] An unacceptable radiological reduction is significantly associated with worse patient-reported outcomes in adults with a displaced distal radius fracture. [257] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.003)
• [L4] Providing computed radiographic parameters to orthopedic surgeons may improve the consistency of the radiographic judgment and influence their clinical decision for the treatment of distal radius fractures. [258] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.09.015)
• [L4] Our study questions the value of routine early post-operative radiographs in the management of distal radius fracture fixations, in particular if the fracture is extra-articular. [259] (10.1142/s2424835519500553)
• [L3] The initial radiograph of a distal radius fracture does not predict a triangular fibrocartilage complex injury. [260] (10.1177/1753193415624669)
• [L2] The excellent correlation of postreduction ultrasound findings with radiographic findings allows us to recommend that this procedure should be considered for real-time monitoring of the closed reduction of distal radius fractures. [261] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.02.031)
• [L4] The optimal postoperative radiographic parameters were thus identified to be essential for successfully obtaining a recovery of the wrist function for unstable distal radius fractures. [262] (10.1142/s2424835516500193)
• [L4] The articular portions of dorsal rim fragments are smaller than indicated by CT, and displaced dorsal rim fragments in dorsally displaced distal radius fractures treated by VLP do not adversely affect wrist clinical outcomes. [263] (10.1055/s-0035-1571184)
• [L2] A radiographic finding of a normalized DRUJ gap on posteroanterior views was the most important predictor to identify DRUJ instability accompanying unstable distal radius fractures. [264] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.004)
• [L5] Most fracture fragments and characteristics can be assessed on plain radiographs, but particular attention should be paid to the volar ulnar rim fragment, while the dorsal ulnar corner and intra-articular free fragment typically require computed tomographic scan for accurate evaluation. [265] (10.1016/j.hcl.2021.02.002)
• [L5] Persistent neurological deficits after distal radius fractures should prompt early investigation and consideration for structural nerve injury. [266] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.101074)
• [L4] Plain x-rays appear to underestimate sigmoid notch involvement following distal radius fractures, revealing extension in only 7 cases (35%) compared to 13 cases (65%) on CT scans. [267] (10.1053/jhsu.2001.22930)
• [L4] Ultrasound examination after volar plate fixation of comminuted distal radius fractures may detect dorsal screw tip prominence when screw lengths are selected to engage the dorsal cortex. [268] (10.1055/s-0035-1569485)
• [L3] Operative treatment of distal radius fracture led more often to longer time lost from work than conservative treatment. [269] (10.1186/s12891-023-06963-0)
• [L4] For distal radius fractures that were initially nondisplaced or minimally displaced, the overall rate of unacceptable radiographic displacement at 6 weeks was 30%. [270] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.006)
• [L4] Both x-ray films and CT scans readily showed extension of fracture lines into the radiocarpal joint, radial shaft, and the ulnar styloid. [271] (10.1016/0363-5023(94)90174-0)
• [L4] Injuries to the scapholunate and lunotriquetral interosseous ligaments occur in approximately one third of distal radius fractures, but their diagnosis is challenging as plain radiographs are not reliably diagnostic. [272] (10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00503)
• [L4] [273] (10.1111/os.12045)
• [L5] The results suggest that 3D fluoroscopy can facilitate the detection of intra-articular incongruities in distal radius fractures and may prompt intra-operative revisions. [275] (10.1186/s13018-025-06284-z)
• [L3] Adequate radiographic reduction is not associated necessarily with better patient-reported functional outcomes or greater satisfaction in elderly patients with conservatively treated distal radius fractures. [280] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.002)
• [L2] Recovery from distal radius fracture was best described using three different trajectories: rapid-recovery (69%), slow-recovery (23%), and non-recovery (8%). [283] (10.1016/j.msksp.2019.07.012)
• [L2] The normal course of recovery following a distal radius fracture is one where severe symptoms subside within the first two-months and the majority of patients can be expected to have minimal pain and disability by six-months following fracture. [284] (10.1186/1471-2474-4-24)
• [L5] As of 24 months after surgery, bone fusion has been achieved in both the radius and ulna without DRUJ impairment. [285] (10.1142/s0218810417720145)

See Also

• Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
• Scaphoid Fracture
• Scapholunate Ligament Injury

References

[1] Managing patient expectations about recovery after a distal radius fracture based on patient reported outcomes. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.11.002

[2] American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Appropriate Use Criteria: Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00139

[3] Self-reported disability following distal radius fractures: The influence of hand dominance. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(00)70027-x

[4] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Wrist Fractures and Dislocations, Carpal Dissociation, and Distal Radius Fractures > III. Fractures of the Distal Radius.

[5] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. RESECTION OF PROXIMAL PART OF RADIAL SHAFT > DISTAL RADIUS.

[6] Controversies in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-22-09-566

[7] Evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of adult distal radius fractures (2025). Injury. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112449

[8] Evidence-Based Review of Distal Radius Fractures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2017.12.001

[9] Harms Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials Underpinning the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.008

[12] Long-Term Outcomes of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning for the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.08.002

[13] Long-Term Outcome of Nonsurgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.019

[14] Apley And Solomon S Concise System Of Orthopaedics And Trauma. FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL RADIUS IN CHILDREN > FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL RADIUS IN ADULTS.

[15] Outcome Metrics in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged Above 50 Years: A Systematic Review. HAND. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211028919

[16] Distal Radius Fractures: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.001

[17] A Unified Approach to Outcomes Assessment for Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.02.001

[18] Serious adverse events and mortality among adults with non-surgically treated distal radius fractures- a nationwide population-based cohort study of 184,446 Danish patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-10037-2

[19] Apley And Solomon S Concise System Of Orthopaedics And Trauma. FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL RADIUS IN CHILDREN > Imaging.

[20] Prognostic factors for persistent pain after a distal radius fracture: a systematic review. Hand Therapy. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17589983221124973

[21] Intermediate-Term Outcome After Distal Radius Fracture in Patients With Poor Outcome at 1 Year: A Register Study With a 2- to 12-Year Follow-Up. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.015

[22] Patient-related outcome, fracture displacement and bone mineral density following distal radius fracture in young and older men. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03843-9

[24] Apley And Solomon S Concise System Of Orthopaedics And Trauma. FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL RADIUS IN CHILDREN > FRACTURE OF THE SCAPHOID.

[25] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Controversies in Management of Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna.

[26] American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Management of Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00719

[29] Conservative Treatment Is Sufficient for Acute Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability With Distal Radius Fracture. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000663

[30] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Management of Expected Adverse Outcomes and Unexpected Complications Related to Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna.

[31] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Malunion.

[32] Effectiveness of Delayed Surgical Treatment for Distal Radius Fractures With Loss of Reduction. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.006

[33] Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Distal Radius Fracture. Hand Clinics. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2021.02.013

[34] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Pathoanatomy and Applied Anatomy Relating to Carpal Fractures and Dislocations.

[36] Distal Radius Fractures—Classification of Treatment and Indications for Surgery. Hand Clinics. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.08.003

[37] Distal Radius Fractures: Classifications and Contemporary Treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01212

[38] Distal radius fracture: The right treatment for each patient. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.007

[40] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Assessment of Radiocarpal Instability.

[41] Intramedullary Fixation of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures: A Preliminary Report. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.004

[42] Les pseudarthroses après fracture de l’extrémité distale du radius : mise au point. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.03.012

[43] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 2Musculoskeletal Trauma Surgery > 1. Distal Radius and Ulna Fracture (ICD-9:813.40).

[44] A Structured Review Addressing the Use of Radiographic Measures of Alignment and the Definition of Acceptability in Patients with Distal Radius Fractures. HAND. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-015-9772-9

[45] Distal radius fracture: the rationale of a classification. Chirurgie de la Main. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00067-1

[46] Distal Radius Fractures in Older Men: A Missed Opportunity?. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.009

[47] A Classification of Extra-articular Distal Radius Fractures With Associated Injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2026.02.009

[48] Radiographic outcomes decline linearly with increased time to surgery in distal radius fractures: A cohort analysis. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251379171

[49] Distal Radius Fractures: Nonoperative and Percutaneous Pinning Treatment Options. Hand Clinics. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.08.012

[50] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Trauma. Fractures of the Forearm and Distal Radius > Distal Radius Fractures.

[51] The Effect of Bisphosphonates on the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures in Women. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.09.006

[52] Loss of Reduction Following Nonoperative Management for Distal Radius Fractures. JBJS Reviews. 2026. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.26.00052

[53] How to Measure Outcomes of Distal Radius Fracture Treatment. Hand Clinics. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.03.003

[54] Prospective Evaluation of Distal Radius Fractures Treated With Variable-Angle Volar Locking Plates. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.116

[55] The Role of CT in Changing the Classification and Treatment of the Fractures of the Distal Radius Compared With Conventional Radiography Regarding Interobserver Agreement. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716660555bj

[56] Distal radius fractures in the elderly population. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190060

[57] Stabilisation of distal radius fractures: Lessons learned and future directions. Injury. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.030

[58] Role for cementoplasty in intra-articular distal radius fractures: Cadaver study and application to arthroscopy. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.010

[59] Current management of distal radius fractures and their complications. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03366-x

[60] External Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.09.009

[62] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Trauma. Fractures of the Forearm and Distal Radius > Distal Radius Fractures > Indications.

[63] Treatment Patterns for Distal Radius Fractures Before and After Appropriate Use Criteria Adoption. HAND. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720975147

[64] Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2010. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201003000-00007

[65] Assessment of complications of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26662

[66] Radiographic Outcomes and Complications of Delayed Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures. HAND. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720930301

[67] Functional outcomes are restored a decade after a distal radius fracture: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2023. DOI: 10.1177/17531934231194682

[69] Distal Radius Fractures: Approaches, Indications, and Techniques. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.05.015

[74] Subacute distal radio-ulnar joint subluxation after a distal radius fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241308137

[76] Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fracture Treated with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation Resulting in an Iatrogenic Galeazzi Lesion. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597089

[78] A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Radiographic Outcomes of Nonsurgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2026. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01150

[79] Routine follow-up radiographs for distal radius fractures are seldom clinically substantiated. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2743-6

[80] Distal radius fractures result in alterations in scapular kinematics: A three-dimensional motion analysis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.12.015

[81] Clinical and biomechanical investigation of an increased articular cavity depth after distal radius fractures: effect on range of motion, osteoarthrosis and loading patterns. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1787-5

[83] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Pathoanatomy and Applied Anatomy Related to Scaphoid Fractures.

[87] Contemporary Evaluation and Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures. Hand Clinics. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2007.03.003

[88] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Extrinsic Ligaments.

[96] Analyses of fracture line distribution in intra-articular distal radius fractures. La radiologia medica. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01025-9

[102] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES.

[105] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Neurovascular Anatomy of Carpal Fractures and Dislocations.

[112] The Importance of the Distal Radioulnar Joint in Distal Radial Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80134-4

[120] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Extrinsic Ligaments of the Carpus.

[122] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Secondary Imaging Methods.

[125] Long-Term Outcomes of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning for the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.005

[129] Management of Soft-Tissue Injuries in Distal Radius Fractures. Hand Clinics. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.03.005

[131] Combined median and ulnar nerve palsy complicating distal radius fractures. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.026

[132] Ulnar Translation, A Commonly Overlooked, Unrecognized Deformity of Distal Radius Fractures. Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1097/bth.0b013e31817d54e8

[134] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Trauma. Fractures of the Forearm and Distal Radius > Distal Radius Fractures > Associated Injuries.

[135] The effects of dorsally angulated distal radius fractures on carpal kinematics. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.32083

[141] Articular Fragment Escape and Carpal Subluxation Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.018

[142] Comparison of outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture: a systematic review update and meta-analysis. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03487-3

[146] Assessment of Articular Cartilage Disorders After Distal Radius Fracture Using Biochemical and Morphological Nonenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.02.009

[147] Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Descriptive Study. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717708025

[149] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Imaging and Other Diagnostic Studies for Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Radiography.

[151] Factors affecting functional outcome of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90028-0

[153] No association between osteoporosis and AO classification of distal radius fractures: an observational study of 289 patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03842-w

[154] Comparison of Palmar Tilt, Radial Inclination and Ulnar Variance in Left and Right Wrists. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(00)80005-4

[157] Distal Radioulnar Joint Kinematics in Simulated Dorsally Angulated Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.013

[161] Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in low-demand patients older than 60 years. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0019

[165] The Effects of Ulnar Styloid Fractures on Patients Sustaining Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.032

[166] Dorsal Wrist Extrinsic Carpal Ligament Injury Exacerbates Volar Radiocarpal Instability After Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fracture. HAND. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1558944719851210

[168] Effects of radioulnar instability on the radiocarpal joint: A biomechanical study. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(90)90144-g

[170] Non-operative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures leads to acceptable functional outcomes, however at the expense of 40% subsequent surgeries. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.01.017

[171] The Clinical Importance of Carpal Instabilities Following Distal Radial Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80135-6

[173] Practical Application of the 2020 Distal Radius Fracture AAOS/ASSH Clinical Practice Guideline: A Clinical Case. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01194

[174] A Comparison of the Long-Term Outcome of Partial Articular (AO Type B) and Complete Articular (AO Type C) Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.027

[182] “PAF” analysis of acute distal radius fractures in adults. Preliminary results. Chirurgie de la Main. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2010.07.005

[183] Adult Distal Radius Fracture Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-01335

[184] Effect of Time-To-Surgery on Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.018

[186] Factors Delaying Recovery After Volar Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.033

[188] Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.001

[189] Infographic: Cast immobilization is non-inferior to volar locking plates in relation to QuickDASH after one year in patients aged 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial of displaced distal radius fractures. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b2.bjj-2020-2562

[192] The Surgical Treatment of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures by Angle Stable Implants: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3181f2b09e

[193] Volar Cortical Integrity in Non-Operatively Treated Adult Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2020. DOI: 10.1142/s2424835520500228

[194] Remote Injuries and Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture Management. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718798838

[196] Life has become troublesome – my wrist bothers me around the clock: an interview study relating to daily life with a malunited distal radius fracture. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1561954

[197] Complications Associated With Operative Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 65 Years and Older. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.018

[199] Differential onset patterns and causes of carpal tunnel syndrome after distal radius fracture: a retrospective study of 105 wrists. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-010-1496-7

[201] What Are the Tradeoffs in Outcomes after Casting Versus Surgery for Closed Extraarticular Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients? A Statistical Learning Model. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001865

[202] Epidemiology and treatment of distal radius fractures: current concept based on fracture severity and not on age. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-1023-7

[203] How to Treat Distal Radius Fractures. Hand Clinics. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2021.02.003

[204] Are Observational Studies on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Robust? An E-value Approach to Analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002528

[206] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Signs and Symptoms of Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna.

[207] Do 3-D Printed Handheld Models Improve Surgeon Reliability for Recognition of Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Characteristics?. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001356

[208] A Scoping Review of the WRIST Trial and Its Subanalyses: Implications for Care of Elderly Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2026. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01160

[210] Classification of distal radius fractures: An analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80006-2

[211] Opioid Use Patterns After Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures: A Call for Opioid Stewardship. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100759

[213] A new distal radius fracture classification depending on the specific fragments through machine learning clustering method. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08215-1

[214] The Extended Flexor Carpi Radialis Approach: A New Perspective for the Distal Radius Fracture. Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00130911-200112000-00004

[215] Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the Fernandez Classification for Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408101667

[216] Influence of distal radius fractures involving the intermediate column on forearm rotation. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1155-4

[219] Do Nondisplaced Distal Radius Fractures Displace: Incidence of Displacement of Initially Nondisplaced Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(10)60105-0

[222] Distal Radius Fractures—Classification of Treatment and Indications for Surgery. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.01.002

[226] Complications Following Internal Fixation of Unstable Distal Radius Fracture With a Palmar Locking-Plate. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e318059b993

[227] AO Distal Radius Fracture Classification: Global Perspective on Observer Agreement. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1587316

[228] Distal Radius Fractures: Does Obesity Affect Fracture Pattern, Treatment, and Functional Outcomes?. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717750915

[232] “Toward a new Era in fracture imaging: zero echo time mri vs ct in intra-articular distal radius fractures — A proof-of-concept study”. Injury. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112846

[235] The relationship between soong classification and fracture characteristics with implant removal for distal radius fractures: a comparative study of 795 cases. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104172

[240] Distal Radius Fracture in the Setting of Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Management and Adverse Events. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.12.017

[242] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Trauma. Fractures of the Forearm and Distal Radius > Distal Radius Fractures > Classification.

[245] Distal Radius Fractures and Concomitant Injuries: Experimental Studies Concerning Pathomechanisms. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00078-0

[246] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 42: Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Operative Treatment of Fractures of the Distal Radius and Ulna > Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning.

[256] Assessment of Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability After Distal Radius Fracture: Comparison of Computed Tomography and Clinical Examination Results. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.017

[257] Association Between Radiological and Patient-Reported Outcome in Adults With a Displaced Distal Radius Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.003

[258] Computer-Generated Radiographic Measurements of Distal Radius Fractures: Does It Help With Decision Making?. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.09.015

[259] The Role of Early Post-Operative Radiographs Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation with a Volar Locking Plate: Time for Change?. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1142/s2424835519500553

[260] The correlation of initial radiographic characteristics of distal radius fractures and injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415624669

[261] Ultrasound-Assisted Closed Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.02.031

[262] Recovery of Wrist Function after Volar Locking Plate Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2016. DOI: 10.1142/s2424835516500193

[263] The Effect of Displaced Dorsal Rim Fragment in a Distal Radius Fracture. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1571184

[264] Predictors of Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability in Distal Radius Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.004

[265] Nuances of Radiographic Assessment of Distal Radius Fractures to Avoid Missed Fragments. Hand Clinics. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2021.02.002

[266] Ulnar Neuroma-in-Continuity Following Distal Radius Fracture: A Rare Complication Requiring Reconstruction with Nerve Allograft and Dynamic Tendon Transfer. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.101074

[267] Evaluation of the sigmoid notch with computed tomography following intra-articular distal radius fracture. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.22930

[268] Ultrasound Imaging Improves Identification of Prominent Hardware in the Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Cadaveric and Prospective Clinical Study. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569485

[269] Sick leave length and the costs of operatively and conservatively treated distal radius fractures in the working age population: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06963-0

[270] Evaluation of Risk Factors for Loss of Acceptable Alignment for Distal Radius Fractures That Are Nondisplaced or Minimally Displaced on Initial Presentation. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.006

[271] Computed tomography scanning with image reconstruction in evaluation of distal radius fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90174-0

[272] Intercarpal Ligament Injuries Associated With Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2019. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00503

[273] Distal Radius Fractures: An Epidemiological Review. Orthopaedic Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/os.12045

[275] Comparison of 2D and 3D fluoroscopy for intraoperative detection of intra-articular incongruities in distal radius fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06284-z

[280] Radiologic and patient-reported functional outcomes in an elderly cohort with conservatively treated distal radius fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.002

[283] Depression affects the recovery trajectories of patients with distal radius fractures: A latent growth curve analysis.. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.07.012

[284] Pain and disability reported in the year following a distal radius fracture: A cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2003. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-24

[285] Screw Fixation and Autogenous Bone Graft for an Irreducible Distal Ulna Fracture Associated with Distal Radius Fracture. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2017. DOI: 10.1142/s0218810417720145