Clinicians › Elbow

Radial tunnel release

Surgeon-side topic for radial tunnel release. Backed by 274 articles from the corpus, retrieved via combined MeSH + title-text matching.

100 citationsUpdated Oct 2026

For patients: a plain-language version of this topic is available. See the patient guide.

Overview

Radial tunnel syndrome involves compression of the radial nerve, and while nonsurgical management remains the first-line treatment, surgical decompression is a viable option for refractory cases despite ongoing controversy regarding diagnosis and outcomes [12]. Surgery is specifically advocated for high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy cases that are resistant to conservative treatment [14]. The procedure requires careful consideration, as a high rate of morbidity is associated with both the condition and its treatment, suggesting that great caution must be taken before performing radial tunnel release [3]. Additionally, performing radial nerve release in association with surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis was not associated with greater improvement [1].

The evidence base for this procedure is limited, with most publications on uncommon compression syndromes of the radial, ulnar, and median nerves consisting of small retrospective series or case reports [13]. Consequently, treatment decisions are not typically based on high levels of evidence [13]. Clinical experience includes long-term follow-up, such as one author reporting on 52 patients operated on for radial tunnel syndrome since 1974 [6]. In rare instances, such as congenital compression of the radial nerve, patients may be followed for an additional 3 months without clinical improvement in radial nerve function [8].

Technical considerations indicate that no single surgical approach was adequate for complete visualization and release of all compression points of the radial tunnel [4]. Therefore, emphasizing the importance of dissecting the entire length of the fibrous tunnel is critical for successful outcomes [14]. Recent advancements include endoscopic techniques, with a 2024 Technical Note describing the details of endoscopic radial tunnel release [7].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Bony Anatomy

The elbow is a trocho-ginglymoid joint comprising medial and lateral articulations that provide bony stability [66]. The ulnohumeral joint forms where the trochlea articulates with the ulna within the greater sigmoid notch, while the radiocapitellar joint consists of the capitellum and radial head [66]. The radial head remains in close approximation to the ulna at the proximal radioulnar joint via the annular ligament [66]. The distal humeral articular surface is angled 30° from the longitudinal axis of the humerus [66]. The axis of rotation is angulated 5° to 7° in the coronal plane relative to the epicondylar axis, with the medial side positioned more distally than the lateral side [66].

The medial column diverges from the humeral shaft at a 45-degree angle in the coronal plane [74], whereas the lateral column diverges at a 20-degree angle [74]. The trochlea is covered by articular cartilage creating an arc of almost 270 degrees [77], and the capitellum encompasses an arc of approximately 180 degrees in the sagittal plane [77]. The olecranon fossa and coronoid fossa are separated by a thin bony septum which is occasionally absent [77]. The medial epicondyle serves as the attachment site for the origins of the flexor pronator mass [66], while the lateral epicondyle is the origin of the lateral extensor musculature [66].

Ligamentous Anatomy

The medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) comprises the anterior bundle, posterior bundle, and transverse ligament [65]. The anterior bundle of the MUCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress within functional elbow range of motion [72], while the posterior bundle is the primary restraint to valgus stress with the elbow in maximal flexion [72]. The lateral collateral ligament complex consists of the radial collateral ligament, the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), and the annular ligament [77]. The LUCL arises from an isometric point on the lateral epicondyle and attaches to the crista supinatoris of the proximal ulna [77]. The LCL complex functions as an important restraint to varus and posterolateral rotatory instability [77].

Osborne's ligament stabilizes the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel [67]. The ligament of Struthers is a variant anatomy arising from a supracondylar process to attach to the medial epicondyle and is a potential site of median nerve compression [67].

Neurovascular Anatomy

The radial nerve splits into the superficial sensory branch and the posterior interosseous nerve on the anterolateral side of the elbow [78]. The posterior interosseous nerve is located just superficial to the anterior joint capsule at the level of the radiocapitellar joint [78]. At the level of the radial neck, the posterior interosseous nerve may come in direct contact with the joint capsule [78]. The ulnar nerve is located just superficial to the posteromedial joint capsule [78]. The ulnar nerve passes posterior to the medial epicondyle and experiences longitudinal strain when subjected to elbow flexion [30]. Osborne's ligament and the arcade of fibers between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris compress the ulnar nerve during elbow flexion [30]. Consequently, the ulnar nerve at the elbow is subjected to both longitudinal strain and mechanical compression when the elbow is flexed [30].

The musculocutaneous and radial nerves contribute 42% and 27.5% respectively to elbow flexion force [28]. The brachioradialis and supinator contribute 64.1% to forearm supination force [28]. The radial nerve enters the interval between the brachialis and brachioradialis muscles in the proximal angle of the lateral approach wound [69]. The deep branch of the radial nerve enters the supinator muscle [69]. The posterior interosseous nerve crosses the radial head midline and increases its distance from bony structures with supination of the forearm [79].

Pathophysiology

The elbow is a common site of nerve entrapment syndromes due to multifactorial reasons including peculiar anatomy and biomechanics [25]. The ulnar, median, and radial nerves run at the elbow in close relationship with the joint, fibrous arches, and through narrow fibro-osseous tunnels [25]. Soft tissue and bone surgical release for elbow stiffness can have significant consequences on nerve conduction, especially in severe contracture [25]. In its native position, the ulnar nerve courses with a significant lever distance posterior to the elbow axis of rotation [59]. Elbow flexion places longitudinal traction and local compression forces on the ulnar nerve in its native position [59]. Biomechanical considerations and anatomical variations may contribute to a decrease in the ulnar nerve's microcirculation and partial pressure of oxygen, leading to cubital tunnel syndrome [59]. The humeral trochlea protrudes into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion, causing dynamic morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve [113].

An average of 4.9 mm ulnar nerve excursion is required at the elbow to accommodate shoulder motion from 30° to 110° of abduction [106]. An average of 5.1 mm ulnar nerve excursion is required at the elbow for elbow motion from 10° to 90° [106]. Ulnar nerve strain of 15% or greater is experienced at the elbow with elbow flexion [106]. In situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow alone does not relieve the tensile strains at the elbow [147]. Increased elbow flexion in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome influences the intraneural blood flow of the ulnar nerve [122]. The mechanism of provocation of symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome by the elbow flexion test cannot be explained simply by dynamic pressure in the cubital tunnel [123]. Shoulder position changes the ulnar nerve strain around the elbow in living patients with cubital tunnel syndrome [120]. Dynamic ulnar nerve compression at the elbow due to the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an uncommon disorder with little-known pathophysiologic mechanisms [138]. Compressive and shearing forces on the superficial radial nerve are thought to obliterate vasa vasorum, leading to ischemia and consequent paraesthesia, dysaesthesia, or painful neuroma formation [54].

Classification

Unified Nomenclature: Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) and posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) compression are distinct entities with different clinical presentations but share identical potential sites of nerve interference [134]. To simplify nomenclature, the author proposes unifying RTS and PIN compression as mild (RTS) and severe (PIN compression) forms of one disease [134].

Other Considerations: Radial tunnel syndrome is an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis [37]. Definitions for the degree of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow are not uniformly agreed upon, and further development of a classification system may be warranted to standardize treatment [48]. The degree of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow was staged using a sensory plus motor classification based on contemporary concepts of the pathophysiology of chronic nerve compression [132].

Clinical Presentation

Diagnostic Controversy and Etiology

Radial tunnel syndrome is described as an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology, lacking verifiable pathophysiology or an accepted reference standard for diagnosis [37]. Skeptics dispute the etiology, noting that its signs and symptoms contrast with other well-described entrapment neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome and cubital tunnel syndrome [81]. Specifically, radial tunnel syndrome presents with prominent focal tenderness, normal neurologic function, and no confirmatory electrodiagnostic evidence of nerve dysfunction [81]. The focal tenderness differs from a positive Phalen's test in carpal tunnel syndrome because the symptoms do not occur in the distribution of the purportedly affected nerve [81]. The posterior interosseous nerve carries unmyelinated (group IV) afferent fibers from the wrist capsule and small myelinated (group IIA) afferent fibers from the muscles along its distribution [81]. Unmyelinated group IV fibers from muscles are associated with nociception and pain [81]. A case of bilateral radial tunnel syndrome with signs discordant with traditionally used clinical diagnostic tests was successfully relieved with surgical decompression [34].

Clinical Signs and Symptoms

Radial tunnel syndrome is an important cause of lateral forearm pain [36]. Clinical examination is a crucial part of the diagnosis, and adherence to a defined protocol is useful in diagnosing this condition [87]. Prominent focal tenderness in the area of the radial tunnel remains one of the principal diagnostic criteria [81]. Patients present with activity-related pain, maximal tenderness 3–5 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle, pain exacerbation with forearm supination, radiation to the dorsoradial aspect of the forearm, and a positive Lister test (pain with resisted middle finger extension) [91]. A clinical diagnosis requires 4 criteria of the five diagnostic signs and symptoms, with one of them being maximal tenderness 3–5 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle [91]. Symptom patterns in terms of muscle weakness caused by radial nerve entrapment at different levels have been evaluated [96]. Any factor that limits excursion at sites of radial nerve movement could result in repetitive traction of the nerve and possibly play a role in the pathophysiology of a mechanical neuropathy, which most often manifests as pain [97].

Diagnostic Testing and Evaluation

In the early stages of nerve compression, provocation testing may be the only positive finding [83]. The concept of increasing nerve tension and compression to provoke symptoms may be extrapolated to other sites of nerve compression [83]. The importance of the double crush mechanism cannot be underestimated in evaluating patients with suspected nerve compression [83]. Compression at proximal sites may affect more distal sites and vice versa, so all entrapment sites in the upper extremity should be evaluated for nerve compression [83]. If all sites of nerve compression are not identified, treatment at only a single site in patients with multiple levels of nerve compression will be unsuccessful in eliminating all symptoms [83]. Tests of provocation using movement, pressure, and the Tinel’s sign can be used to identify the sites of nerve compression in the upper extremity [83]. Evaluation of more proximal entrapment sites may produce patient discomfort, so testing should begin at the most distal entrapment sites and progress proximally [83]. A Tinel’s sign is performed at each entrapment site by applying four to six digital taps and is considered positive with reproduction of patient symptoms in the appropriate neural distribution [83]. There has been no randomized controlled trial that compares surgical with nonsurgical treatment or with a placebo for radial tunnel syndrome [81]. Skeptics of radial tunnel syndrome point to the great variability of surgical results reported in the literature as one of the characteristics of placebo surgery [81].

Investigations

Clinical Examination and History: The physical examination is directed by the history and the specific location of the patient's pain in the anterior, posterior, medial, or lateral aspect of the elbow [33]. Pathologic entities associated with discrete compartments of the elbow aid the examiner in detecting pathologic conditions [33]. Clinical examination is a crucial part of the diagnosis for radial tunnel syndrome [36]. The evaluation of the elbow requires an intimate understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, and diagnostic tests for this complex joint [33]. A case of bilateral radial tunnel syndrome presented with signs discordant with traditionally used clinical diagnostic tests [34].

Electrodiagnostics: Electromyography/nerve conduction velocity studies should be performed if any question about neurologic dysfunction exists [80]. At 6 months post-operatively, EMG analysis showed no residual compression and good release of the ulnar nerve in all cases [180].

Plain radiography: Plain radiographs remain the hallmark and the best screening test for elbow evaluation [33]. AP, lateral, and oblique radiographs are standard for elbow evaluation [80]. The primary bony landmarks for elbow radiographs include the ulnohumeral joint, coronoid process, radial head, capitellum, radiocapitellar joint, olecranon tip, coronoid/olecranon fossae, and trochlear ridge [80]. Standard AP and lateral radiographs are indicated for the evaluation of elbow osteoarthritis [89]. Radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process, coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa in elbow osteoarthritis [89]. Joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint are usually preserved in elbow osteoarthritis [89], while joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint are mildly narrowed [89]. Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in the elbow [89]. AP, lateral, oblique, and axillary views of the elbow may reveal posteromedial olecranon osteophytes and/or loose bodies in valgus extension overload syndrome [84]. Diagnosis of elbow dislocation is made by clinical examination and verified by radiograph to rule out associated fractures [90]. The anteroposterior radiograph is diagnostic for medial or lateral elbow dislocations [90]. Postreduction radiographs are necessary to rule out occult fracture after elbow dislocation reduction [90]. Serial radiography is used as follow-up when heterotopic ossification is present [80].

MRI: MRI is a useful diagnostic modality for confirming nerve compression, assessing space-occupying lesions, and excluding other pathologies in athletes with entrapment neuropathies of the shoulder and elbow [175]. MRI is an effective diagnostic modality for identifying primary synovial chondromatosis as a causative factor of cubital tunnel syndrome [177]. The MRI was 50% sensitive, 75% specific, and 72% accurate in the identification of surgically confirmed ulnar nerve subluxation [181]. MRI can be used to evaluate ligaments and tendons, but it is rarely indicated for elbow stiffness [80]. MRI may be most helpful in evaluating associated injuries including partial or complete tears of the medial collateral ligament in valgus extension overload syndrome [84].

CT: CT is helpful when assessing for malunion architecture and the location and pattern of osteophytes and/or loose bodies [80]. CT is not necessary when elbow stiffness is entirely soft-tissue related [80]. Three-dimensional CT is used to check for heterotopic ossification [80]. CT may be useful for surgical planning of elbow osteoarthritis, allowing a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [89]. CT with two-dimensional reconstruction and three-dimensional surface rendering best visualizes the pathology of valgus extension overload syndrome [84].

Treatment

Non-Operative

Nonsurgical management is the first-line treatment for radial tunnel syndrome [12]. For radial nerve palsy, non-operative treatment usually yields satisfactory results, though surgery is indicated for nerve transection or lack of improvement after conservative treatment [128].

Operative

Indications: Surgical decompression remains a viable option for refractory cases of radial tunnel syndrome [12]. Surgery is advocated for high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy cases resistant to conservative treatment [14]. Because a high rate of morbidity is associated with both the disease and its treatment, great caution has to be taken before performing radial tunnel release [3]. For isolated lateral epicondylitis, a percutaneous release performed in the office is an effective treatment for recalcitrant cases that have failed nonoperative management [58]. However, radial nerve release in association with surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis was not associated with greater improvement [1].

Surgical Approach / Technique: An adequate preoperative evaluation of the compression level may help determine the most suitable surgical approach to treat the entrapment with minimal damage to surrounding tissues [38]. While no single approach was adequate for complete visualization and release of all compression points of the radial tunnel [4], a single brachioradialis-splitting approach is adequate for complete visualization and release of all compression sites [18]. In high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy, the importance of dissecting the entire length of the fibrous tunnel is emphasized [14]. Both methods can quickly and safely expose the radial nerve in the posterior humeral approach [20]. Endoscopic radial tunnel release is described in technical notes detailing its specific procedures [7]. In cadaveric analysis, both the modified proximal and direct lateral portals provide adequate distance from the radial nerve and may be safe for clinical use [115]. One author reports operating on 52 patients for radial tunnel syndrome since 1974 [6].

Other Considerations: Patients who underwent surgical exploration within 3 weeks of injury had a significantly higher likelihood of regaining radial nerve function than patients who underwent nonsurgical management with or without late surgical exploration [5]. For longstanding, irreparable, isolated radial nerve lesions, tendon transfers are indicated [17]. The median nerve provides a reliable source of donor nerve fascicles for radial nerve reinnervation [56]. Postoperatively, all patients except one had good to excellent recovery of wrist extension following median to radial nerve transfers [56]. A total of 12 patients recovered good to excellent finger and thumb extension, 2 had fair recovery, and 5 had poor recovery following these transfers [56]. The technique of transhumeral radial nerve transposition allowed less worrisome dissection during revision surgery despite multiple previous procedures [31]. Radial nerve transposition with humeral fracture fixation is safe, does not cause iatrogenic injury, and protects the radial nerve during all subsequent approaches to the fracture site [49]. Immediate surgical removal of extruded cement and decompression of the radial nerve may aid in recovery of nerve function [22]. Return of function is less likely when power instruments or ultrasound is used for cement removal, while formal exposure and protection of the radial nerve are predictive of recovery [23]. In one case, the patient was followed for an additional 3 months without clinical improvement in radial nerve function following treatment for congenital compression [8]. PINN can provide relief in a patient's chronic wrist pain [173]. Neurolysis of the superficial radial nerve offers the opportunity for pain relief, but it does not reliably produce success [54]. At final follow-up (mean 3.5 years), fourteen cases reported symptomatic resolution while eleven continued to experience dysaesthesia following neurolysis of the distal superficial radial nerve [54]. Intra-operatively, evidence of external abnormality, scarring, or compression was identified in only six cases of tethered superficial radial nerves, and its presence did not correlate with symptomatic outcome [54].

Complications

Nerve palsy: Radial nerve release performed in association with lateral epicondylitis treatment was not associated with greater improvement in outcomes [1]. A high rate of morbidity is associated with both radial tunnel syndrome and its treatment, suggesting that great caution must be taken before performing radial tunnel release [3]. Patients who underwent surgical exploration within 3 weeks of radial nerve injury had a significantly higher likelihood of regaining radial nerve function than patients who underwent nonsurgical management with or without late surgical exploration [5]. In primary or secondary radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fracture, spontaneous recovery occurs in the majority of patients, so initial nonsurgical management is recommended [51]. Operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures results in a similar permanent radial nerve palsy rate compared to nonoperative treatment, despite inherent additional surgery-related risks [160]. Immediate surgical removal of extruded cement and decompression of the radial nerve may aid in recovery of nerve function following thermal injury during total elbow arthroplasty [22]. Return of radial nerve function is less likely when power instruments or ultrasound is used for cement removal, while formal exposure and protection of the radial nerve are predictive of recovery [23]. Transhumeral radial nerve transposition allowed less worrisome dissection during revision surgery despite multiple previous procedures [31]. Spontaneous recovery of radial nerve function can occur following axonamonosis caused by impingement from distal locking screws during humeral nailing [201]. The risk of radial nerve injury from impingement by distal locking screws could be reduced by using a mini-open method during screw insertion [201]. No increased morbidity was attributed to the extended delto-pectoral approach for complex humeral shaft fractures, though radial nerve palsy could not be completely avoided [194]. During surgical exposure of the proximal fourth of the radius, the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) should be isolated to avoid possible iatrogenic complications [206]. Superficial thrombophlebitis resulting in entrapment of the radial nerve branch in the forearm is a rare condition [193]. Arthroscopic treatment for lateral epicondylitis can result in severe posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) neuropathy, including complete transection of the PIN [112]. In a case of arthroscopic lateral epicondylitis release, 60% of the radial nerve was transected in the region overlying the radiocapitellar joint just proximal to the arcade of Frohse [112]. Following iatrogenic PIN transection during lateral epicondylitis surgery, an autogenous sural nerve graft can restore grade 3 strength of the extensor digitorum communis and grade 2 extensor pollicis longus strength [112]. Posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy following distal biceps repair typically resolves within 3 months, and at the latest, 5 months after surgery [207]. The incidence of PIN palsy following distal biceps tendon repair was 1.9% in a retrospective cohort of 970 cases [161].

Other Considerations: The purpose of endoscopic radial tunnel release is to describe the details of the procedure [7]. Most publications on uncommon upper extremity compression neuropathies, including radial tunnel syndrome, are small retrospective series or case reports, and treatment decisions are not typically based on high levels of evidence [13]. A patient with congenital compression of the radial nerve was followed for an additional 3 months without clinical improvement in radial nerve function [8]. The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low at 5.6%, but higher for ulnar nerve transposition (9.6%) than in situ cubital tunnel release (3.6%) [63]. The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition [195]. The incidence of failure requiring ipsilateral revision surgery after cubital tunnel release remained steadily low at 1.4% during the study period [108]. The risk of revision cubital tunnel release was low [45]. Results of revision surgery for recurrent or persistent cubital tunnel syndrome are less predictable and satisfying than primary surgery [64]. Cubital tunnel surgery should be considered a failure if patients have no relief of their symptoms or if the symptoms recur shortly after the surgery [40]. Failure to relieve symptoms in cubital tunnel syndrome can be attributed to diagnosis-related factors, surgical-related factors, and patient-related factors [152]. Persistent symptoms after cubital tunnel release result from incorrect diagnosis or incomplete release, whereas recurrent symptoms are most often associated with postoperative fibrosis [152]. Surgical-related factors contributing to recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome include incomplete release, ulnar nerve instability, formation of a new site of compression, and nerve injury [152]. The rate of revision surgery following cubital tunnel release with transposition is quite low, and there do not appear to be major differences in the rate of revision among the different types of surgical transposition [198]. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release has a recurrence rate that is not higher than open cubital tunnel release literature controls, with a 95% confidence interval for the true recurrence rate between 0.02% and 5.24% [200]. Revision surgery was required in 3.2% of cases following in situ ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome [111]. The first revision surgery after in situ ulnar nerve decompression occurred at a median interval of 10 months from the index surgery, with a range of 3 to 59 months [111]. Preoperative antibiotics do not demonstrate benefit for patients undergoing uncomplicated ulnar nerve releases at the elbow and do not significantly decrease the risk for postoperative infections [199]. Knowledge of possible compression sites of the ulnar nerve is important to the surgeon so that complications are avoided and postoperative recurrence is decreased [192]. Ulnar nerve dysfunction at the elbow after platelet-rich plasma treatment for partial ulnar collateral ligament injuries may be more likely to develop in patients who present with a subluxing ulnar nerve [197]. Minor complications in a series of ulnar nerve anterior transmuscular transposition occurred in 24 cases, most of which were seromas or ecchymoses [104]. Major complications requiring a second operation occurred in 4.3% of cases in a series of ulnar nerve anterior transmuscular transposition [104]. Reoperation for symptom recurrence was needed in 2.5% of cases in a series of ulnar nerve anterior transmuscular transposition [104]. There were no complications after the use of a novel local adipofascial flap for the management of recalcitrant ulnar tunnel syndrome [203]. Complications associated with reconstructive elbow surgery persist, often leading to profound and sometimes nonsalvageable disability, with aseptic loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture being the most devastating problems [202].

Recovery

Spontaneous Recovery and Timing: Spontaneous recovery occurs in 70%–88% of radial nerve injuries [126]. In primary or secondary radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fracture, spontaneous recovery occurs in the majority of patients [51]. Surgically treated humeral shaft fractures associated with radial nerve palsies are expected to show signs of neurologic recovery during the first 6 months [191]. These patients should recover completely after 12 months of follow-up in almost all cases [191]. The radial nerve recovered better if repaired or reconstructed within 5 months of injury [61]. In a case of synovial sarcoma with radial nerve involvement, recovery of wrist and finger extensors was first seen after four months, and both motor and sensory recovery was complete eight months after surgery [125].

Surgical Intervention and Technique: The choice of surgical technique and timing depends on the type of trauma, site of injury, and time elapsed since injury [126]. In clinical settings in which the likelihood of spontaneous recovery of nerve function is low or when an informed patient has a strong preference for surgery, early surgery may optimize outcome [190]. Immediate surgical removal of extruded cement and decompression of the radial nerve may aid in recovery of nerve function [22]. Successful recovery of radial nerve lacerations can be achieved after nerve grafting [172]. Good to excellent motor recovery can be expected in 83% of patients who have a large gap of the radial nerve when sural nerve autografts are sutured to the areas that have motor fascicles dominantly [185].

Rehabilitation and Adjunctive Measures: Early tendon transfer quickly restored efficient grip while awaiting reinnervation of wrist extensors, avoiding the need for prolonged external splintage [187]. Tendon transfers are one reconstructive option in a ladder of reconstructive alternatives that can improve function after injury to the radial, median, or ulnar nerves [188]. Customized dynamic splints promoted optimal function and recovery in a patient with high radial nerve injury by addressing functional goals and tissue biological needs without the need for wire bending or outriggers [189].

Prognosis and Complications: A high rate of morbidity is associated with both the disease and its treatment, suggesting that great caution has to be taken before performing radial tunnel release [3].

Key Evidence

• [L1] Radial nerve release, in association with surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis, was not associated with greater improvement. [1] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.009)
• [L5] The authors believe that a high rate of morbidity is associated with both the disease and its treatment, suggesting that great caution has to be taken before performing radial tunnel release. [3] (10.1097/00130911-200212000-00010)
• [L5] No single approach was adequate for complete visualization and release of all compression points of the radial tunnel. [4] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.009)
• [L2] Patients who underwent surgical exploration within 3 weeks of injury had a significantly higher likelihood of regaining radial nerve function than patients who underwent nonsurgical management with or without late surgical exploration. [5] (10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00142)
• [L4] The author reports operating on 52 patients for radial tunnel syndrome since 1974. [6] (10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80243-9)
• [L5] The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the details of endoscopic radial tunnel release. [7] (10.1016/j.eats.2024.103391)
• [L5] The patient was followed for an additional 3 months, without clinical improvement in radial nerve function. [8] (10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80099-1)
• [L4] The article reviews the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment of radial tunnel syndrome, noting that while nonsurgical management is first-line, surgical decompression remains a viable option for refractory cases despite ongoing controversy regarding diagnosis and outcomes. [12] (10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00314)
• [L4] This article reviews uncommon compression syndromes of the radial, ulnar, and median nerves, noting that most publications are small retrospective series or case reports and treatment decisions are not typically based on high levels of evidence. [13] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.014)
• [Case_report] The authors advocate for surgery in high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy cases resistant to conservative treatment, emphasizing the importance of dissecting the entire length of the fibrous tunnel. [14] (10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.060)
• [L3] Tendon transfers are indicated in longstanding, irreparable, isolated radial nerve lesions. [17] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.015)
• [L5] A single brachioradialis-splitting approach is adequate for complete visualization and release of all compression sites of the radial tunnel. [18] (10.1177/1558944717750916)
• [L5] Both methods can quickly and safely expose the radial nerve. [20] (10.1186/s12891-023-06291-3)
• [L4] Immediate surgical removal of the extruded cement and decompression of the radial nerve may aid in recovery of nerve function. [22] (10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.002)
• [L4] Return of function is less likely when power instruments or ultrasound is used for cement removal, while formal exposure and protection of the radial nerve are predictive of recovery. [23] (10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.012)
• [L5] [25] (10.1016/j.jisako.2023.12.007)
• [L4] The musculocutaneous and radial nerves contribute 42% and 27.5% respectively to elbow flexion force, while the biceps brachii contributes 46.7% and the brachioradialis and supinator contribute 64.1% to forearm supination force. [28] (10.1177/1753193408087036)
• [L5] [30] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.04.016)
• [L4] Transhumeral radial nerve transposition allowed less worrisome dissection during revision surgery despite multiple previous procedures. [31] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.008)
• [L5] A case of bilateral radial tunnel syndrome with signs discordant with traditionally used clinical diagnostic tests was successfully relieved with surgical decompression. [34] (10.1177/15589447211029045)
• [L5] Radial tunnel syndrome is relatively uncommon but is an important cause of lateral forearm pain, with clinical examination being a crucial part of the diagnosis. [36] (10.1197/j.jht.2006.02.005)
• [L5] Radial tunnel syndrome is an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis. [37] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.020)
• [L5] [38] (10.1016/j.jisako.2024.03.001)
• [L5] Cubital tunnel surgery should be considered a failure if patients have no relief of their symptoms or if the symptoms recur shortly after the surgery. [40] (10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00329-2)
• [L3] The risk of revision cubital tunnel release was low. [45] (10.1097/corr.0000000000002629)
• [L4] Definitions for the degree of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow are not uniformly agreed upon, and further development of a classification system may be warranted to standardize treatment. [48] (10.1055/s-0038-1665548)
• [L4] The technique is safe, does not cause iatrogenic injury, and protects the radial nerve during all subsequent approaches to the fracture site. [49] (10.1097/01.blo.0000072470.32680.60)
• [L4] In primary or secondary radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fracture, spontaneous recovery occurs in the majority of patients, so initial nonsurgical management is recommended. [51] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.029)
• [L4] [54] (10.1177/1753193407087892)
• [L4] [56] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.09.034)
• [L4] For isolated lateral epicondylitis, a percutaneous release performed in the office is an effective treatment for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis that has failed nonoperative management. [58] (10.1097/00132589-200112000-00003)
• [L5] [59] (10.1053/jhsu.1999.0886)
• [L4] The radial nerve recovered better if repaired or reconstructed within 5 months of injury. [61] (10.1177/1753193409360283)
• [L3] The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (5.6%), but higher for ulnar nerve transposition (9.6%) than in situ cubital tunnel release (3.6%). [63] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.033)
• [L4] Results of revision surgery for recurrent or persistent cubital tunnel syndrome are less predictable and satisfying than primary surgery. [64] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.024)
• [L5] [81] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.016)
• [L5] [83] (10.1197/j.jht.2005.02.002)
• [L4] The diagnosis of radial tunnel syndrome remains clinical, and adherence to a defined protocol is useful in diagnosing this condition. [87] (10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80015-6)
• [L2] [91] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.023)
• [L5] Symptom patterns in terms of muscle weakness caused by radial nerve entrapment at different levels were also evaluated. [96] (10.1016/0363-5023(91)90205-p)
• [L5] Any factor that limits excursion at these sites could result in repetitive traction of the nerve and possibly could play a role in the pathophysiology of a mechanical neuropathy, which in the case of the radial nerve most often manifests as pain. [97] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.06.008)
• [L4] [104] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.054)
• [L5] [106] (10.1053/jhsu.2001.26140)
• [L4] The incidence of failure requiring ipsilateral revision surgery after cubital tunnel release remained steadily low (1.4%) during the study period. [108] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.028)
• [L3] [111] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.012)
• [L4] [112] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.038)
• [L5] The humeral trochlea protrudes into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion, causing dynamic morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve. [113] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.026)
• [L5] In cadaveric analysis, both the modified proximal and direct lateral portals provide adequate distance from the radial nerve and may be safe for clinical use. [115] (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.012)
• [L4] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing that shoulder position changes the ulnar nerve strain around the elbow in living patients with CubTS. [120] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.014)
• [L3] Increased elbow flexion in patients with CuTS influences the intraneural blood flow of the ulnar nerve. [122] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.024)
• [L3] The mechanism of provocation of symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome by the elbow flexion test could not be explained simply by dynamic pressure in the cubital tunnel, and other pathophysiological factors could also be contributing. [123] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.013)
• [L5] Recovery of wrist and finger extensors was first seen after four months, and both motor and sensory recovery was complete eight months after surgery. [125] (10.1016/0266-7681(85)90028-2)
• [L4] The choice of surgical technique and timing depends on the type of trauma, site of injury, and time elapsed since injury, with spontaneous recovery occurring in 70%–88% of radial nerve injuries. [126] (10.1177/17531934241240867)
• [L5] Treatment is usually non-operative with satisfactory results, though surgery is indicated for nerve transection or lack of improvement after conservative treatment. [128] (10.1302/2058-5241.1.000028)
• [L4] [132] (10.1016/0363-5023(89)90192-5)
• [L5] Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) and posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) compression are distinct entities with different clinical presentations but share identical potential sites of nerve interference; the author proposes unifying them as mild (RTS) and severe (PIN compression) forms of one disease to simplify nomenclature. [134] (10.1177/1753193420953990)
• [L4] Dynamic ulnar nerve compression at the elbow due to the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an uncommon, little-known disorder with much remaining to be elucidated about its incidence and pathophysiologic mechanisms. [138] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.002)
• [L5] In situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow alone does not relieve the tensile strains at the elbow, which may contribute to cubital tunnel syndrome. [147] (10.1053/jhsu.2002.35870)
• [L5] [152] (10.1177/17531934241238533)
• [L1] Furthermore, operative treatment results in a similar permanent radial nerve palsy rate, despite its inherent additional surgery-related risks. [160] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.072)
• [L3] [161] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.028)
• [L4] Successful recovery of radial nerve lacerations can be achieved after nerve grafting. [172] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.036)
• [L4] PINN can provide relief in patient's chronic wrist pain. [173] (10.1177/1558944717692093)
• [Paper] MRI is a useful diagnostic modality for confirming nerve compression, assessing space-occupying lesions, and excluding other pathologies in athletes with entrapment neuropathies of the shoulder and elbow. [175] (10.1016/j.csm.2006.03.005)
• [Case_report] MRI is an effective diagnostic modality, and clinicians should be aware of primary synovial chondromatosis as a causative factor of cubital tunnel syndrome. [177] (10.1177/1758573216683396)
• [L4] At 6 months, EMG analysis showed no residual compression and good release of the ulnar nerve in all cases. [180] (10.1016/j.main.2014.10.075)
• [L3] The MRI was only 50% sensitive, 75% specific, and 72% accurate in identification of surgically confirmed ulnar nerve subluxation. [181] (10.1016/s1058-2746(95)80208-8)
• [L4] Good to excellent motor recovery can be expected in 83% of patients who have a large gap of the radial nerve when sural nerve autografts are sutured to the areas that have motor fascicles dominantly. [185] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.004)
• [L4] Early tendon transfer quickly restored efficient grip while awaiting reinnervation of wrist extensors, avoiding the need for prolonged external splintage. [187] (10.1177/1753193410384696)
• [L5] Tendon transfers are one reconstructive option in a ladder of reconstructive alternatives that can improve function after injury to the radial, median, or ulnar nerves. [188] (10.5435/jaaos-21-11-675)
• [Case_report] Customized dynamic splints promoted optimal function and recovery in a patient with high radial nerve injury by addressing functional goals and tissue biological needs without the need for wire bending or outriggers. [189] (10.1197/j.jht.2006.11.013)
• [L2] In clinical settings in which the likelihood of spontaneous recovery of nerve function is low or when an informed patient has a strong preference for surgery, early surgery may optimize outcome. [190] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.029)
• [L3] Surgically treated humeral shaft fractures associated with radial nerve palsies are expected to show signs of neurologic recovery during the first 6 months and should recover completely after 12 months of follow-up in almost all cases. [191] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.024)
• [L5] Knowledge of possible compression sites of the ulnar nerve is important to the surgeon so that complications are avoided and postoperative recurrence is decreased. [192] (10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.004)
• [Case_report] Superficial thrombophlebitis resulting in entrapment of the radial nerve branch in the forearm is a rare yet noteworthy condition. [193] (10.1186/s12891-024-07545-4)
• [L4] No increased morbidity was attributed to the open surgical approach, though radial nerve palsy could not be completely avoided. [194] (10.1186/s12891-024-07915-y)
• [L4] The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition. [195] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.020)
• [L4] This complication may be more likely to develop in patients who present with a subluxing ulnar nerve. [197] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2020.11.006)
• [L3] The rate of revision surgery following cubital tunnel release with transposition is quite low, and there do not appear to be major differences in the rate of revision among the different types of surgical transposition, indicating that a true subcutaneous transposition may be adequate. [198] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100815)
• [L4] Preoperative antibiotics do not demonstrate benefit for patients undergoing uncomplicated ulnar nerve releases at the elbow and do not significantly decrease the risk for postoperative infections in patients, regardless of patient comorbidities. [199] (10.1177/15589447221107688)
• [L4] We are 95% confident that our true recurrence rate is between 0.02% and 5.24% and that endoscopic cubital tunnel release has a recurrence rate, which is not higher than open cubital tunnel release literature controls. [200] (10.1007/s11552-009-9227-2)
• [L4] The case demonstrates spontaneous recovery of radial nerve function following axonamonosis caused by impingement from distal locking screws, suggesting that this phenomenon may be more common than previously assumed and that the risk could be reduced by using a mini-open method during screw insertion. [201] (10.1111/sae.12018)
• [L4] Complications associated with reconstructive elbow surgery persist, often leading to profound and sometimes nonsalvageable disability, with aseptic loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture being the most devastating problems. [202] (10.5435/00124635-201106000-00003)
• [L4] There were no complications after the procedure and no donor-site morbidity. [203] (10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.010)
• [L5] The authors recommend that during surgical exposure of the proximal fourth of the radius the PIN should be isolated to avoid possible iatrogenic complications. [206] (10.1016/0363-5023(93)90253-y)
• [L4] These injuries typically resolve within 3 months, and at the latest, 5 months after surgery. [207] (10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.001)

See Also

• Radial Tunnel Syndrome
• Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
• Neuropathies
• Elbow Osteoarthritis
• Elbow Arthroplasty
• Distal Biceps Repair
• Cubital Tunnel Release
• Ligament Injuries

References

[1] Effect of Radial Nerve Release on Lateral Epicondylitis Outcomes: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.009

[3] Radial Tunnel Syndrome. Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1097/00130911-200212000-00010

[4] Anatomical Study of the Surgical Approaches to the Radial Tunnel. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.009

[5] Radial Nerve Palsy Recovery With Fractures of the Humerus: An Updated Systematic Review. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2020. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00142

[6] Radial tunnel syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1984. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80243-9

[7] Endoscopic Radial Tunnel Release. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103391

[8] Congenital compression of the radial nerve. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1989. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80099-1

[12] Radial Tunnel Syndrome: Review and Best Evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2023. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00314

[13] Uncommon Upper Extremity Compression Neuropathies. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.014

[14] High radial nerve entrapment neuropathy: an anatomical cadaver study and case report. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.060

[17] An Analysis of Results After Selective Tendon Transfers Through the Interosseous Membrane to Provide Selective Finger and Thumb Extension in Chronic Irreparable Radial Nerve Lesions. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.015

[18] Transbrachioradialis Approach to the Radial Tunnel: An Anatomic Study of 5 Potential Compression Sites. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717750916

[20] Compare the clinical value of two minimally invasive approaches to locating radial nerve in the posterior humeral approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06291-3

[22] Radial nerve recovery after thermal injury due to extruded cement during humeral revision in total elbow arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.002

[23] Radial nerve palsy after humeral revision in total elbow arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.012

[25] Causes, symptoms, and treatments of nerve entrapments around the elbow: Current concepts. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.12.007

[28] The Role of the Musculocutaneous and Radial Nerves in Elbow Flexion and Forearm Supination: A Biomechanical Study. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408087036

[30] Modified Intramuscular Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.04.016

[31] Transhumeral Anterior Radial Nerve Transposition to Simplify Anticipated Future Humeral Reconstruction. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.008

[33] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Summary and Conclusions.

[34] Radial Tunnel Syndrome: Case Report and Comprehensive Critical Review of a Compression Neuropathy Surrounded by Controversy. HAND. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211029045

[36] Radial Tunnel Syndrome: A Surgeon's Perspective. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2006. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.02.005

[37] Radial Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.020

[38] Current concepts of surgical approach for radial nerve entrapment around the elbow. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.03.001

[40] CUBITAL TUNNEL SURGERY. Hand Clinics. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00329-2

[45] What Factors Are Associated With Revision Cubital Tunnel Release Within 3 Years?. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002629

[48] Decision-Making Factors for Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Cubital Tunnel Surgery. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1665548

[49] Radial Nerve Transposition With Humeral Fracture Fixation. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2003. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000072470.32680.60

[51] Current Treatment of Radial Nerve Palsy Following Fracture of the Humeral Shaft. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.029

[54] Neurolysis of the Distal Superficial Radial Nerve for Dysaesthesia Due to Nerve Tethering. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193407087892

[56] Clinical Outcomes Following Median to Radial Nerve Transfers. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.09.034

[58] Management of Lateral Epicondylitis With Percutaneous Release. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00132589-200112000-00003

[59] Cubital tunnel syndrome: Anterior transposition as a logical approach to complete nerve decompression. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1999. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0886

[61] Outcomes of Nerve Reconstruction for Radial Nerve Injuries Based on the Level of Injury in 244 Operative Cases. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2010. DOI: 10.1177/1753193409360283

[63] Complication Rates of Cubital Tunnel Surgery: In situ Cubital Tunnel Release Compared with Ulnar Nerve Transposition. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.033

[64] Recurrent or Persistent Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.024

[65] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Annotated References.

[66] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Anatomy > Bony Anatomy.

[67] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. SECTION 16 PATELLAR TRACKING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY > TABLE 2.3 Shoulder Spaces.

[69] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. LATERAL APPROACHES.

[72] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. ELBOW.

[74] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 2Musculoskeletal Trauma Surgery > INJURIES AROUND THE ELBOW.

[77] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 29: Principles of Nonunion and Bone Defect Treatment > Pathoanatomy and Applied Anatomy Related to Distal Humerus Fractures.

[78] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. PERTINENT ANATOMY AND PORTALS.

[79] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. REFERENCES.

[80] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > IV. Evaluation.

[81] Unusual Compression Neuropathies of the Forearm, Part I: Radial Nerve. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.016

[83] Evaluation of Nerve Injury and Nerve Compression in the Upper Quadrant. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2005. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.02.002

[84] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Injuries in the Athlete* > III. Valgus Extension Overload Syndrome and Posterior Impingement.

[87] Radial Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80015-6

[89] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > I. Osteoarthritis.

[90] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 2Musculoskeletal Trauma Surgery > ELBOW DISLOCATION.

[91] Investigating the Effect of Triamcinolone Local Injection on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Radial Tunnel Syndrome: A Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.023

[96] Radial nerve entrapment at the elbow: Surgical anatomy. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1991. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(91)90205-p

[97] Radial Nerve Excursion and Strain at the Elbow and Wrist Associated With Upper-Extremity Motion. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.06.008

[104] Outcomes of ulnar nerve anterior transmuscular transposition and significance of ulnar nerve instability in cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.054

[106] Ulnar nerve excursion and strain at the elbow and wrist associated with upper extremity motion. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.26140

[108] Risk factors for revision surgery following isolated ulnar nerve release at the cubital tunnel: a study of 25,977 cases. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.028

[111] Predicting Revision Following In Situ Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Patients With Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.012

[112] Nerve Injuries Resulting From Arthroscopic Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: Report of 2 Cases. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.038

[113] Dynamic analysis of the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel morphology using ultrasonography: a cadaveric study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.026

[115] Modified Anterolateral Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Cadaveric Study on Safety. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.012

[120] Shoulder position increases ulnar nerve strain at the elbow of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.014

[122] Dynamic Evaluation of Intraneural Microvascularity of the Ulnar Nerve Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.024

[123] Association Between the Elbow Flexion Test and Extraneural Pressure Inside the Cubital Tunnel. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.013

[125] Synovial sarcoma: with radial nerve involvement. The Journal of Hand Surgery: Journal of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. 1985. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(85)90028-2

[126] Timing of surgery in peripheral nerve injury of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241240867

[128] Radial nerve palsy. EFORT Open Reviews. 2016. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000028

[132] Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90192-5

[134] Radial tunnel syndrome: definition, distinction and treatments. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1753193420953990

[138] Dynamic Compression of the Ulnar Nerve Associated With the Anconeus Epitrochlearis Muscle: Do We Really Know Everything?. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.002

[147] Ulnar nerve strains at the elbow: The effect of in situ decompression and medial epicondylectomy. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.35870

[152] State of the art review. Upper extremity revision nerve compression surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241238533

[160] Conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.072

[161] Major complications after distal biceps tendon repairs: retrospective cohort analysis of 970 cases. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.028

[172] Posterior Interosseous Nerve Laceration Following Elbow Arthroscopy. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.036

[173] Outcomes Following Isolated Posterior Interosseous Nerve Neurectomy: A Systematic Review. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717692093

[175] Entrapment Neuropathies of the Shoulder and Elbow in the Athlete. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2006.03.005

[177] Ulnar nerve palsy caused by synovial protrusion in synovial chondromatosis of the elbow: a case report and literature review. Shoulder & Elbow. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1758573216683396

[180] Syndrome de compression du nerf ulnaire au coude traité par neurolyse endoscopique : à propos de 17 cas. Chirurgie de la Main. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2014.10.075

[181] Diagnostic utility of MRI in elite throwing athletes with medial elbow pain. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(95)80208-8

[185] Sural Nerve Autografts for High Radial Nerve Injury With Nine Centimeter or Greater Defects. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.004

[187] Functional restoration after early tendon transfer in high radial nerve paralysis. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2010. DOI: 10.1177/1753193410384696

[188] Tendon Transfers for Radial, Median, and Ulnar Nerve Palsy. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2013. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-21-11-675

[189] Customized Dynamic Splinting: Orthoses that Promote Optimal Function and Recovery after Radial Nerve Injury: A Case Report. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2007. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.11.013

[190] Management of Radial Nerve Palsy Associated With Humeral Shaft Fracture: A Decision Analysis Model. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.029

[191] Time to Recovery of Radial Nerve Palsy After Surgically Treated Humeral Shaft Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.024

[192] Regional anatomic structures of the elbow that may potentially compress the ulnar nerve. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.004

[193] Superficial thrombophlebitis in the forearm leading to entrapment of the radial nerve branch: a first case report and literature review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07545-4

[194] Complications and morbidity of the extended delto-pectoral approach in treating complex humeral shaft fractures with proximal metaphyseal extension using a long locking plate for internal fixation. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07915-y

[195] Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries After In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release Compared With Ulnar Nerve Transposition: A Retrospective Review. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.020

[197] Ulnar nerve dysfunction at the elbow after platelet-rich plasma treatment for partial ulnar collateral ligament injuries. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2020.11.006

[198] Cubital Tunnel Revision After Transposition: A Single Center Experience. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100815

[199] The Effectiveness of Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Ulnar Nerve Release at the Cubital Tunnel. HAND. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221107688

[200] Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel Recurrence Rates. HAND. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-009-9227-2

[201] Spontaneous Recovery of Radial Nerve Function Following Axonamonosis Caused by Impingement from Distal Locking Screws during Humeral Nailing. Shoulder & Elbow. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/sae.12018

[202] Complications of Total Elbow Arthroplasty. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2011. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201106000-00003

[203] A novel local adipofascial flap for the management of recalcitrant ulnar tunnel syndrome. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.010

[206] A study of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) and the radial tunnel in 30 Thai cadavers. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90253-y

[207] Prognosis for recovery of posterior interosseous nerve palsy after distal biceps repair. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.001