Clinicians › Hand
Flexor tendon repair

For patients: a plain-language version of this topic is available. See the patient guide.
Overview¶
Flexor tendon repair in Zone II is a technically demanding procedure, but outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. Primary repair in the digital sheath area has become standard practice, characterized by a shift toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation [12]. Many principles of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation can be applied to zones III–V [11]. However, no gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm, and repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty [2].
Despite improvements in surgical technique and rehabilitation, functional outcomes for flexor tendon injuries remain unreliable, with adhesion formation and joint contractures being the most common complications [5]. Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally have not yielded results as good as other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases [4]. Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs regarding relative motion orthoses for early active motion [10].
Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics and repair of tendons in the different zones, potential complications, rehabilitation protocols, recent advances in treatment, and future directions, including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site [7]. Secondary reconstruction remains an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries or those that have failed primary repair [6]. Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice for flexor tendon injuries in zones I and II when direct repair is not possible or delayed [8]. A modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 utilizes a 6-strand core suture without circumferential suturing, selective pulley division, and partial FDS resection to facilitate early active motion and improve outcomes [15].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Flexor tendons function as cables that transmit forces to move and stabilize joints [35]. An understanding of the biomechanics of the flexor tendon system is essential to proper evaluation and treatment of disorders of the upper extremity [35]. A thorough understanding of the anatomy and mechanism of injury is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative management of flexor tendon injuries [51].
Adhesion formation is the most common complication following flexor tendon injuries [5]. Joint contractures are the most common complication following flexor tendon injuries [5]. Functional outcomes for flexor tendon injuries remain unreliable despite improvements in surgical technique and rehabilitation [5].
Prevention Strategies: * Early active postoperative mobilization: This is an effective measure to prevent adhesion formation [48] and prevent interphalangeal (IP) joint stiffness [48]. * Sparing the wrist: This is an effective measure to prevent adhesion formation [48].
Therapists must understand the implications of wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint positioning to safely facilitate tendon gliding [40]. Therapists must understand the implications of wrist and MCP joint positioning to prevent secondary pathomechanical changes [40].
Classification¶
Zone-based Classification: Flexor tendon injuries are classified into distinct zones that dictate specific anatomical considerations and repair principles [7]. Management requires consideration of injury location as a key factor alongside surgical timing, approach, and soft tissue handling [14].
Zone II: Primary flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath area (Zone II) has become standard practice, characterized by a shift toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation [12]. These repairs are technically demanding but have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. Subdividing Zone 2 is a key factor in improving outcomes in flexor tendon repair [43].
Zone I: Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally yield poorer results than other zones, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases [4].
Other Considerations: Differences in the management of flexor tendon injuries between children and adults include variations in classification, diagnosis, technical aspects of Zone I and II repairs, core suture purchase length, rehabilitation, results, and complications [26].
Clinical Presentation¶
Flexor tendon injuries are complex, requiring careful consideration of surgical timing, injury location, surgical approach, and soft tissue handling [14]. Repair in Zone II is a technically demanding procedure [1], though outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. In contrast, Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally have not yielded results as good as other flexor tendon injuries [4]. Full motion is rarely regained in Zone I injuries [4], with good or excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases [4].
Adhesion formation is the most common complication after flexor tendon repair [5]. Joint contractures are also the most common complication after flexor tendon repair [29]. Repair ruptures are documented in most reports, with rates ranging from 4%-10% in finger flexors [16]. Repair rupture rates range from 3%-17% in the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) of thumbs [16]. Spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand occur more often than recognized, with the majority involving the profundus tendon of the small finger in the palm [24].
Pediatric flexor tendon injuries differ from adults in diagnosis and rehabilitation [18]. Pediatric flexor tendon injuries often require surgical exploration due to uncooperative patients [18].
Investigations¶
Plain radiography: Indicated to evaluate bony integrity and joint alignment in the context of flexor tendon injuries.
MRI: No gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm [2]. Flexor tendon repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty [2].
CT: Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics, and repair of tendons in different zones [7].
Bone scan: Adhesion formation is the most common complication of flexor tendon injuries [5]. Joint contractures are the most common complication of flexor tendon injuries [5].
Tomosynthesis: Secondary reconstruction is an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries [6]. Secondary reconstruction is an important and useful technique for flexor tendon injuries that have failed primary repair [6].
Aspiration: Limited evidence currently exists for the use of relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs in zones IV and VII [10].
Laboratory: Even otherwise healthy patients can expect some residual digital stiffness following flexor tendon sheath infection despite aggressive and prompt antibiotic therapy and surgical intervention [33].
Other Considerations: Outcomes for flexor tendon repair in Zone II have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding potential complications [7]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding rehabilitation protocols [7]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding recent advances in treatment [7]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding future directions, including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site [7]. There is large heterogeneity in the outcome domains being assessed or measured across studies on hand flexor tendon injuries [9]. A consistent core outcome set is needed for future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries [9]. Many principles of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation can be applied to zones III–V [11]. Primary flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath area has become standard practice [12]. There is a shift toward strong multistrand core sutures in primary flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath area [12]. There is a shift toward modified pulley preservation in primary flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath area [12]. Despite significant advances, the drive towards perfection in flexor tendon repair and reconstruction continues [13]. Repair rupture rates for finger flexors range from 4% to 10% [16]. Repair rupture rates for the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) of thumbs range from 3% to 17% [16]. Pediatric flexor tendon injuries differ from adult injuries in diagnosis and rehabilitation [18]. Initial clinical experience with the volar plate of the distal interphalangeal joint as a distally based flap in flexor tendon surgery is encouraging [21]. The volar plate flap technique may take its place in flexor tendon surgery [21]. Late direct repair is possible in approximately 1 in 10 to 1 in 15 patients where tendon ends can be approximated with acceptable tension [22]. Spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand occur more often than one might recognize [24]. The majority of spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand involve the profundus tendon of the small finger in the palm [24].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative¶
Limited evidence currently exists for the use of relative motion orthoses following flexor tendon repairs in zones IV and VII [10], as well as for relative motion flexion orthoses generally [49]. There is insufficient evidence to support true active motion as an effective or preferable rehabilitation choice due to a lack of superior benefits compared to other regimens [42].
Operative¶
Indications: Management of flexor tendon injuries requires consideration of surgical timing, injury location, surgical approach, and soft tissue handling [14]. Secondary reconstruction is an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries or those that have failed primary repair [6]. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations for flexor tenolysis emphasize that patient selection, cooperation, and a rational goal are as key to success as the operative procedure itself [27].
Surgical Approach / Technique: Flexor tendon repair in Zone II is technically demanding, but outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. No gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm; repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty [2]. Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally yield poorer results than other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases [4]. The central tenet of modern flexor tendon surgery is to increase tendon healing and avoid adhesion formation by making a repair strong enough to move within a few days of injury [19]. Consistent, successful management relies on understanding anatomy, characteristics and repair of tendons in different zones, potential complications, rehabilitation protocols, recent advances in treatment, and future directions including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site [7]. Despite significant advances in flexor tendon repair and reconstruction, the drive towards perfection continues [13].
Implant Selection: Several techniques for surgical pulley reconstruction have been described, typically using palmaris longus tendon graft or extensor retinaculum in either a nonencircling or looped fashion [46]. The Kleinert and Bennett (Weilby) technique is a nonencircling technique that uses a tendon graft woven into the residual end of the flexor tendon sheath, allowing pulley tension to be set but lacking immediate strength [46]. The Okutsu triple-loop reconstruction is an encircling technique that uses a triple loop of free tendon graft passed around the phalanx subcutaneously [46]. The Lister extensor retinaculum technique is an encircling technique that uses a strip of extensor retinaculum graft placed around the phalanx, overwrapped, and sutured to provide a smooth gliding surface, permitting active and passive motion [46]. The loop-and-a-half technique uses a tendon graft that passes around the phalanx and then through one limb of the tendon graft; it is described as the strongest in biomechanical cadaver studies excluding the triple-loop technique [46]. Early active motion is typically permitted after pulley reconstruction because reconstruction of A2 and A4 pulleys restores near-normal tendon excursion and joint motion in a cadaver study [46].
Adjuncts: Some practitioners no longer perform flexor tendon repair with tourniquet, sedation, or muscle paralysis [41]. Initial clinical experience with the volar plate of the distal interphalphalangeal joint as a distally based flap in flexor tendon surgery is encouraging, and the technique may take its place in flexor tendon surgery [21].
Other Considerations: Adhesion formation and joint contractures are the most common complications after flexor tendon repair [5]. Tendon adhesion and joint contracture are the most common complications after flexor tendon repair, managed through prevention, meticulous surgical technique, and thoughtful rehabilitation protocols [29]. Prompt recognition of problems and treatment with hand therapy, splinting, and/or surgery may help minimize recovery time and improve function after flexor tendon injuries [23]. Pediatric flexor tendon injuries differ from adults in diagnosis and rehabilitation, often requiring surgical exploration due to uncooperative patients [18]. Understanding the role that growth factors play in tendon repair should enable a more targeted approach to improve results, although currently no strategies are routinely used in clinical practice [20]. Increasing the number of suture strands, using locking-loop configurations, and optimizing suture purchase length significantly improve the mechanical strength and gap resistance of flexor tendon repairs [52].
Complications¶
Stiffness / Arthrofibrosis: Adhesion formation and joint contractures are among the most common complications following flexor tendon injuries [5]. Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally yield poorer functional outcomes compared to injuries in other zones, with full motion rarely regained [4].
Tendon Rupture: Flexor tendon repair ruptures occur at rates ranging from 4% to 10% in finger flexors [16]. In the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) of thumbs, rupture rates range from 3% to 17% [16].
Recovery¶
Adhesion formation and joint contractures are the most common complications following flexor tendon injuries [5]. Rehabilitation strategies remain a controversial topic [38]. While motion at the repair site decreases the risk for adhesions, it simultaneously increases the risk for rupture [38]. Repeated administration of sodium hyaluronate at the tendon repair site may be effective in improving postoperative active finger motion after primary hand flexor tendon repair in the mid-term [30].
Rehabilitation protocol: The author recommends the partial-range active flexion protocol as a safe, efficient, and generalizable framework for rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and other hand disorders [31]. This protocol is particularly recommended where therapist assistance is unavailable [31].
Other Considerations: The large heterogeneity in outcome domains assessed across studies highlights the need for a consistent core outcome set in future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries [9]. Future research is suggested to increase understanding of repair strength in children [32]. Further studies are needed to determine optimal age ranges for early active motion in children [32]. Additional research is suggested to determine the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitative options in children [32].
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Flexor tendon repair in Zone II is a technically demanding procedure, but outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying. [1] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.001)
- [L5] No gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm, and repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty. [2] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.025)
- [L5] Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally have not yielded results as good as other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases. [4] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.004)
- [L5] Despite improvements in surgical technique and rehabilitation, functional outcomes for flexor tendon injuries remain unreliable, with adhesion formation and joint contractures being the most common complications. [5] (10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004)
- [L5] Secondary reconstruction remains an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries or those that have failed primary repair. [6] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.018)
- [L5] Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics and repair of tendons in the different zones, potential complications, rehabilitation protocols, recent advances in treatment, and future directions, including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site. [7] (10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00316)
- [L5] Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice for flexor tendon injuries in zones I and II when direct repair is not possible or delayed. [8] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.003)
- [L2] The large heterogeneity in the outcome domains being assessed/measured across studies highlights the need for a consistent core outcome set to be measured in future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries. [9] (10.1177/17531934251342732)
- [L1] Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs. [10] (10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.011)
- [L5] Many of the principles of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation can be applied to zones III–V. [11] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.007)
- [L5] Primary flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath area has become standard practice with a shift toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation. [12] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.003)
- [L5] Despite significant advances in flexor tendon repair and reconstruction, the drive towards perfection continues. [13] (10.1177/17531934251404821)
- [L5] Flexor tendon injuries are complex, and management requires consideration of surgical timing, injury location, approach, and soft tissue handling. [14] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.013)
- [L5] The authors describe a modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 that utilizes a 6-strand core suture without circumferential suturing, selective pulley division, and partial FDS resection to facilitate early active motion and improve outcomes. [15] (10.1016/j.hcl.2017.03.001)
- [L4] Repair ruptures were documented in most reports with rates ranging from 4%-10% in finger flexors and 3%-17% in FPL of thumbs. [16] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.005)
- [L5] Pediatric flexor tendon injuries differ from adults in diagnosis and rehabilitation, often requiring surgical exploration due to uncooperative patients. [18] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.004)
- [L4] The central tenet of modern flexor tendon surgery is to increase tendon healing and avoid adhesion formation by making a repair strong enough to move within a few days of injury. [19] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.03.001)
- [L5] Understanding the role that growth factors play in tendon repair should enable a more targeted approach to be developed to improve the results of flexor tendon repair, although currently no strategies are routinely used in clinical practice. [20] (10.1177/1753193413509231)
- [L4] Initial clinical experience is encouraging and the volar plate flap technique may take its place in flexor tendon surgery. [21] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.004)
- [L4] Late direct repair is possible in a small proportion of patients (approximately 1 in 10 to 1 in 15) where tendon ends can be approximated with acceptable tension. [22] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.004)
- [L5] Prompt recognition of problems and treatment with hand therapy, splinting, and/or surgery may help minimize recovery time and improve function. [23] (10.5435/00124635-200607000-00001)
- [L4] Spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand occur more often than one might recognize, with the majority involving the profundus tendon of the small finger in the palm. [24] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.012)
- [L5] [26] (10.1177/1753193413498207)
- [L5] The article outlines preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations for flexor tenolysis, emphasizing that patient selection, cooperation, and a rational goal are as key to success as the operative procedure itself. [27] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.008)
- [L5] Tendon adhesion and joint contracture are the most common complications after flexor tendon repair, managed through prevention, meticulous surgical technique, and thoughtful rehabilitation protocols. [29] (10.1016/j.hcl.2014.12.004)
- [L1] Repeated administration of sodium hyaluronate at the tendon repair site may be effective in improving postoperative active finger motion after primary hand flexor tendon repair in the mid-term. [30] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.012)
- [L5] The author recommends the partial-range active flexion protocol as a safe, efficient, and generalizable framework for rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and other hand disorders, particularly where therapist assistance is unavailable. [31] (10.1177/17531934211037112)
- [L5] Future research is suggested to increase understanding of repair strength, optimal age ranges for early active motion, and cost-effectiveness. [32] (10.1016/j.jht.2014.12.002)
- [L5] Despite aggressive and prompt antibiotic therapy and surgical intervention, even otherwise healthy patients can expect some residual digital stiffness following flexor tendon sheath infection. [33] (10.5435/jaaos-20-06-373)
- [L5] An understanding of the biomechanics of the flexor tendon system is essential to proper evaluation and treatment of disorders of the upper extremity, as the tendons function as cables transmitting forces to move and stabilize joints. [35] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.002)
- [L5] Rehabilitation after surgical repair of flexor injuries is a controversial topic where motion at the repair site decreases risk for adhesions but increases risk for rupture. [38] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.010)
- [L5] Therapists must understand the implications of wrist and MCP joint positioning to safely facilitate tendon gliding and prevent secondary pathomechanical changes. [40] (10.1177/17531934241265579)
- [L5] The authors no longer perform flexor tendon repair with tourniquet, sedation, or muscle paralysis. [41] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.009)
- [L1] Based on a lack of superior benefits following true active motion regimens, there is not sufficient evidence to support true active motion as an effective or preferable choice for flexor tendon rehabilitation at this time. [42] (10.1016/j.jht.2018.06.001)
- [L5] The article reviews a three-decade research journey demonstrating that subdividing Zone 2, releasing critical pulleys (A2 and A4), and using strong multi-strand repairs with early active motion are key to improving outcomes in flexor tendon repair. [43] (10.1177/17531934221087585)
- [L5] [46] (10.1016/j.hcl.2016.08.006)
- [L5] Early active postoperative mobilization and sparing of the wrist are effective measures to prevent adhesion formation and IP joint stiffness. [48] (10.1177/17531934231182868)
- [L4] There is currently limited evidence informing use of relative motion flexion orthoses following flexor tendon repair. [49] (10.1016/j.jht.2022.11.004)
- [L5] A thorough understanding of the anatomy and mechanism of injury is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative management. [51] (10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.004)
- [L5] Increasing the number of suture strands, using locking-loop configurations, and optimizing suture purchase length significantly improve the mechanical strength and gap resistance of flexor tendon repairs. [52] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044)
References¶
[1] Acute Flexor Tendon Repairs in Zone II. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.001
[2] Flexor Tendon Repairs: Techniques, Eponyms, and Evidence. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.025
[4] Zone I Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.004
[5] Complications After Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004
[6] Secondary Flexor Tendon Reconstruction, A Review. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.018
[7] Flexor Tendon Injuries. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00316
[8] Delayed Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries Including Grafting. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.003
[9] Developing a core outcome set for hand flexor tendon injuries: a systematic review of treatment outcomes. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251342732
[10] Relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.011
[11] Treatment of Acute Flexor Tendon Injury: Zones III–V. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.007
[12] Current Practice of Primary Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.003
[13] The IFSSH consensus and current guidelines on flexor tendon repairs and reconstruction. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251404821
[14] Flexor Tendon Injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.013
[15] Primary Flexor Tendon Repair with Early Active Motion. Hand Clinics. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.03.001
[16] Clinical Outcomes Associated with Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.005
[18] Pediatric Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.004
[19] Primary Flexor Tendon Surgery. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.03.001
[20] The growth factors involved in flexor tendon repair and adhesion formation. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413509231
[21] Use of the Volar Plate of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint as a Distally Based Flap in Flexor Tendon Surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.004
[22] Uncommon Methods of Flexor Tendon and Tendon-Bone Repairs and Grafting. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.004
[23] Complications After Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00001
[24] Spontaneous Flexor Tendon Ruptures of the Hand: Case Series and Review of the Literature. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.012
[26] Flexor tendon injuries in the child. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413498207
[27] Flexor Tenolysis. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.008
[29] Management of Complications of Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.12.004
[30] Effectiveness of Sodium Hyaluronate and ADCON-T/N for the Prevention of Adhesions in Hand Flexor Tendon Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.012
[31] Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17531934211037112
[32] Flexor tendon injuries in children: Rehabilitative options and confounding factors. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.12.002
[33] Flexor Tendon Sheath Infections of the Hand. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-20-06-373
[35] Biomechanics of the Flexor Tendons. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.002
[38] Postsurgical Rehabilitation of Flexor Tendon Injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.010
[40] Zone-specific pitfalls in flexor tendon rehabilitation: management and prevention. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241265579
[41] Wide-awake Flexor Tendon Repair and Early Tendon Mobilization in Zones 1 and 2. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.009
[42] Flexor tendon rehabilitation in the 21st century: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.06.001
[43] Investigations into flexor tendon repair: a research journey over three decades. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17531934221087585
[46] Flexor Tendon Pulley Injuries in Rock Climbers. Hand Clinics. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2016.08.006
[48] Complications of flexor tendon repair. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934231182868
[49] Relative motion flexion following zone I-III flexor tendon repair: Concepts, evidence and practice.. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.11.004
[51] Evaluation and Treatment of Flexor Tendon and Pulley Injuries in Athletes. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.004
[52] Technical and Biological Modifications for Enhanced Flexor Tendon Repair. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044