Skip to content

Clinicians › Hand

Strength and Motion

Hand strength & motion assessment: grip/pinch strength correlation to function, normative data, and impact of common pathologies.

138 citationsUpdated Oct 2026
Illustration: Strength and Motion

Overview

Physical outcome measures are shifting toward patient-reported outcomes, as range of motion and strength are considered less reliable than previously thought [1]. Functional range of motion remains critical for directing surgical indications, guiding rehabilitation, and assessing treatment outcomes [2]. However, distal interphalangeal joint range of motion and hand grip strength in individual patients have little value for predicting isolated finger flexion force [3]. Age will most likely have a significant effect on postoperative range of motion and strength [14]. Digits require sensation and freedom of motion to enable effective use, and effective surgery restores biomechanical motions so patients have optimum use [24].

Assessment tools and protocols vary significantly. New features of digital dynamometers, unavailable with the analog Jamar dynamometer and unaccounted for in existing clinical guidelines, could potentially influence grip scores [9]. A method of controlled torque and joint position has been used experimentally and clinically as a tool for objective assessment of passive range of motion [11]. Standardized procedures are needed when testing torque strength [146]. Surface electromyographic signal studies aim to identify the specific amount of motion allowed within immobilization devices and the level of function allowed within each device to establish data for evidence-based decisions [33]. Functional capacity evaluations should not replace the surgeon's determination of a patient's abilities based on objective physical examination and radiographic findings [22]. The best form of assessing the ability to return to work is based on a competent physician's understanding of residual impairments combined with knowledge of the patient's work requirements [22].

Specific clinical contexts demonstrate variable impacts on strength and motion. Patients with posttraumatic arthritis following distal radius fractures experienced diminished range of motion and poorer patient-reported outcomes regarding general functioning and satisfaction, but no altered grip strength [5]. Cross-education effects on shoulder rotator muscle strength and function after shoulder stabilization surgery have no effect on functional outcomes [6]. Isolated gracilis tendon harvesting is not associated with loss of strength and maintains good functional outcome [7]. Early active motion rehabilitation may not lead to better range of motion long-term than passive motion protocols following flexor tendon repair [13]. The Latarjet procedure more commonly affects range of motion rather than shoulder and elbow strength [15]. Patients using low-profile outriggers require more strength to initiate and maintain active movement opposite to the mobilizing force, even when dynamic-assist forces are equal [16]. Exercise regimens for carpometacarpal osteoarthritis are developed to preserve CMC joint range of motion and increase the strength of the stabilizing muscles of the thumb [31]. Successful replantation for a radiocarpal joint amputation is associated with major restriction of motion, decreased strength, and moderate disability on functional outcome assessments [34]. First ray stabilization with mini-tightrope is a valuable solution to maintain good mobility in patients with low strength requirements on their daily lives [59]. Achieving a functional and durable outcome in total wrist arthroplasty requires proper patient selection, careful preoperative planning, and accurate implantation [61]. Bilateral handgrip strength assessments have potential clinical utility in guiding rehabilitation strategies after rotator cuff repair [62]. Patients undergoing distal radioulnar joint constrained arthroplasty were able to return to regular activities with excellent range of motion and restored lifting capacity, reporting no pain and utmost satisfaction with the prosthesis [142].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Osseous Architecture and Kinematics

The skeleton of the hand and wrist comprises 27 bones, 19 of which are long bones [38]. The hand skeleton is organized into five rays, each forming a polyarticulated chain of metacarpals and phalanges [38]. The wrist possesses three axes of movement, including pronation and supination from the forearm, permitting the hand to be positioned in any spatial configuration for grasping [38]. In the sagittal plane, the thumb metacarpal makes an angle of approximately 45 degrees with the second metacarpal, allowing the thumb to oppose the other four digital rays [38]. The transverse axis of the palm is oblique, forming an acute angle of approximately 75 degrees with the longitudinal axis [38].

The index metacarpal is the most firmly fixed element of the metacarpal arch [73]. The fifth metacarpal has a range of flexion–extension of approximately 20 degrees at its carpal articulation [73]. The metacarpophalangeal joints serve as the keystones of the longitudinal arches of the hand, stabilized by thick anterior glenoid capsules known as volar plates [73]. The axes of flexion for the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints are arranged such that flexion causes the fingers to converge toward the scaphoid [81].

Musculotendinous Anatomy

Extrinsic muscles originate outside the hand and insert on the hand or carpus, while intrinsic muscles have both origin and insertion within the hand [37]. The extrinsic extensors run through six different fibroosseous retinacular compartments at the wrist level [37]. The extensor digitorum communis tendons of the middle, ring, and little fingers are tethered together by juncturae tendinum over the dorsum of the hand proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint [37]. Sagittal band fibers form a sling that transmits proximal extrinsic extensor tension to the proximal phalanx, permitting metacarpophalangeal joint extension without a direct tendinous insertion onto the proximal phalanx [37]. Rupture or attenuation of sagittal band fibers allows the extrinsic extensor tendon to sublux to the ulnar side of the metacarpal head, causing ulnar deviation of the finger [37].

The flexor digitorum profundus inserts on the proximal volar aspect of the distal phalanx, flexing the distal interphalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and metacarpophalangeal joints [37]. The flexor digitorum superficialis tendon bifurcates around the flexor digitorum profundus at the beginning of the A2 pulley and inserts via radial and ulnar slips into the proximal metaphysis of the middle phalanx [77]. The A2 and A4 annular pulleys are the most essential structures in maintaining the mechanical advantage of the flexor tendons [77].

There are seven interosseous muscles in the hand, consisting of four dorsal and three volar muscles [70]. The dorsal interossei are abductors, while the volar interossei are adductors [70]. The middle finger has two dorsal interossei and no volar interossei because the central axis of the hand lies within it [70]. The deep head of each dorsal interosseous muscle forms a lateral band that flexes and weakly abducts the proximal phalanx while extending the middle and distal phalanges [70]. Simultaneous activation of the flexor digitorum profundus and intrinsic muscles results in altered kinematics and larger fingertip-to-palm distances compared with flexor digitorum profundus activation alone [117].

Soft Tissue and Gliding Mechanisms

The dorsal skin of the hand is thin, possesses a normal pilosebaceous system, and has loose connections with deeper planes that allow free gliding [79]. Flexion of the fingers produces a significant lengthening of the dorsal skin, with an average increase of 3 cm in the middle finger from extension to full flexion [79]. The palmar skin is subdivided into functional units, with the central triangular part of the palm being fixed and poorly vascularized, covering the superficial palmar aponeurosis [69].

The gliding mechanism of tendons in narrow crowded areas is assured by synovial sheaths surrounded by fibrous sheaths that act as pulleys when the tendon changes direction [78]. The tenosynovium lining the fibroosseous tunnel supplies nutrition and lubrication to the poorly vascularized flexor tendons [77]. Within the flexor tendon sheath, tendon vascularity is supplied via the vincula system, specifically the vinculum longus and brevis [77].

Biomechanics and Pathomechanics

Painless and full hand function requires seamless integration of joints, muscles, and nerves [18]. Ideally, digits need sensation and freedom of motion to enable effective use, and effective surgery restores biomechanical motions for optimum patient use [24]. Intra-articular gaps from distal radius fractures result in significant joint incongruity that can interfere with wrist and hand function [42]. Radial shortening following distal radius fracture results in loss of volar tilt, interferes with the function of the distal radioulnar joint, and can lead to midcarpal instability [42]. Extra-articular malalignment of the distal radius is associated with pain and decreased grip strength [42].

Progressive metacarpal shortening produces proportionally greater loss of fingertip flexion force at increasing amounts of finger flexion [106]. The intrinsic plus deformity is caused by excessive intrinsic muscle tension, preventing full proximal interphalangeal joint flexion when the metacarpophalangeal joint is fully extended [91]. Flexor tenosynovitis may produce limitation of interphalangeal joint motion, resulting in a range of active flexion significantly less than passive flexion [91]. Limited joint mobility of the thumb and index finger may cause temporal changes in precision grip force control, leading to reduced manual dexterity [88].

The dynamic interaction of finger joints during cylinder grip shows specific patterns, with distal interphalangeal joints consistently initiating flexion last [98]. Synchronization of finger joint flexion during cylinder grip increases significantly by the end of motion compared to the beginning [98]. The middle finger is the most important contributor to grip strength [101]. At a position of 30 degrees of wrist extension, maximal grip strength is achieved without significantly compromising grip endurance [111]. Dynamic grip strength differs from static grip strength measured with the wrist in a standardized static position [107].

Grip-load force adjustments are not completely determined by the mechanics of object motion, as nonmechanical factors such as perceptual factors may affect the coupling [97]. Individuals with hand osteoarthritis apply higher grip forces at liftoff and peak and demonstrate longer latency compared to controls [95]. The effect of blocking flexion of one finger on the other digits varies considerably between individuals, preventing prediction of the effect of stiffness on hand strength [39]. Range of motion in the distal interphalangeal joint and hand grip strength are of little value for predicting isolated finger flexion force in an individual patient [3].

Classification

Kellgren–Lawgrade: In studies of hand osteoarthritis, radiographs are graded 0–4 using the ordinal criteria of Kellgren and Lawrence [10]. Participants with radiographs interpreted as Grade 0 or 1 are considered free of OA, while those with Grade 2, 3, or 4 are classified as having OA [10].

Bayne–Klug: This radiological classification describes the type and extent of bone defect associated with radial deficiency, specifically indicating whether support for the hand is present [155]. In Bayne–Klug types III and IV, support for the hand is completely lacking [155].

OTA: Fractures are classified using the OTA system, which includes extra-articular and intra-articular categories [192]. In one study cohort, there were 17 extra-articular fractures and 23 intra-articular fractures [192]. Specific subtypes included 15 A3.2, 11 C2.1, eight C3.2, two each of A3.3 and C2.2, and one each of C3.3 and C2.3 fractures [192]. Only one of the intra-articular fractures had intra-articular displacement [192].

Gustilo: Open fractures are classified by the Gustilo system; in the referenced study, one fracture was Gustilo grade 1 open [192].

Other Considerations: Physical outcome measures are transitioning toward patient-reported outcomes, as range of motion and strength are not as reliable as previously thought [1]. Functional range of motion is critical for directing surgical and rehabilitation indications and for assessing treatment outcomes [2]. In the distal interphalangeal joint, range of motion and hand grip strength in the individual patient are of little value for predicting isolated finger flexion force [3]. The AMC Disc-O-Gram classification system measures efficacy as movement and function improve [20]. The term "Stiffness" requires an exact description of the load configuration and the exact localization and kind of deformation measured [141].

Assessment Reliability: Manual muscle testing (MMT) is the standard for evaluating intrinsic hand muscles, graded on the Medical Research Council (MRC) or Oxford Scale from 0 to 5 [29]. Grade 0 indicates complete paralysis, grade 3 indicates movement against gravity (or full active range of motion in modified hand assessments), and grade 5 indicates normal strength [29]. MMT was first developed by Lowman in 1911, with gravity-based grades introduced by Lovett [29]. In the hand, a group of muscles is usually tested rather than a single muscle, and some authors suggest labeling the movement rather than the muscle [29]. Not all hand muscles can be sufficiently isolated to grade their strength, and it is not always necessary to test all muscles innervated by a particular nerve to evaluate motor function impairment [53]. Hand-held devices are not justified for grading strength except in a few instances, and there is no substitute for manual testing for muscle length [25]. Unless handheld dynamometry is widely adopted or a better validated grading system is developed, the MRC will continue to be used [129].

Instrumented Measurement: A novel finger grip dynamometer system measures each finger's grip strength simultaneously and records the time course of grip motion, allowing objective quantification of symptoms [4]. The Multiple Angle Testing Method assesses muscle group strength following disease or surgery, determines therapy effectiveness, and detects old muscle injuries missed by existing diagnostic methods [8]. A microcomputer-based system for measuring hand strength is accurate, reliable, and easy to operate [47]. The motion analysis system is a reliable tool for evaluating fingertip motion, and the closed curve derived from it is easier to interpret and comparable in serial examinations [17, 149]. The measured angular motion of each individual joint should be recorded for accurate comparison [35]. Evidence-based administration and interpretation of grip strength assessment by rehabilitation professionals are essential across the continuum of care [140].

Joint Kinematics: Isolated flexion of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is not possible to the full extent in any finger; associated flexion at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint occurs when isolated MCP flexion is attempted [185]. Full MCP-joint flexion with 45 degrees or less of PIP-joint flexion was achieved in only five fingers; in all other fingers, associated PIP flexion exceeded 45 degrees at the end of the test movement [185]. Two patterns of MCP-joint flexion were identified: a nearly normal pattern (15% of fingers) where MCP flexion occurred with little associated PIP flexion until late stages, and a more common pattern (85% of fingers) where MCP flexion was associated with PIP flexion even during early stages [185]. Non-dimensional analysis supported this visual classification, with the nearly normal pattern considered an extreme variation rather than qualitatively different [185]. In the fingers, only a small percentage of the active range of motion of the joints was required for functional tasks [152]. Improved understanding of carpal motion patterns may lead to changes in functional rehabilitation and surgical management [26]. From all analyzed motions, the highest Fossa-Foveolar Mismatch was found in external rotation in all groups [135]. More study of anatomical morphological patterns may explain variations in motion and grip-strength [36].

Clinical Outcomes: Accurate diagnosis and management of hand and carpal fractures and dislocations are predicated on a thorough physical examination and appropriate imaging to limit joint stiffness while preserving mobility and function [19]. For Colles' fractures, functional results were significantly better in the brace-treated group at 8, 13, and 26 weeks [170]. Grip strength was better in the brace group at splint removal and at 8 weeks, but this advantage was lost by 13 weeks [170]. Pinch strength in the brace group remained significantly better than the control group throughout most of the treatment and follow-up period [170]. No differences were observed among low back pain subgroups regarding physical abilities [65]. Strength of the thumb is affected in all types of triphalangeal thumb, though thumb strength is apparently sufficient for daily life in the investigated group [139].

Rehabilitation and Training: The exercise regimen for carpometacarpal osteoarthritis was developed in accordance with American College of Sports Medicine guidelines to preserve CMC joint range of motion and increase the strength of the stabilizing muscles of the thumb [31]. Resistance training, a general term for strength, power, and plyometrics training, has been shown to produce strength gains in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy [193]. Muscle plasticity, including hypertrophy and neural adaptations, has been demonstrated in youth with cerebral palsy in response to resistance training [193]. The degree of strength gains is variable due to heterogeneity in participants (severity levels, ages), exercise types, targeted muscle groups, and dosing parameters [193]. Dosing refers to the delivery of a therapeutic agent in a specified manner, with parameters including frequency (sessions per week), volume (sets and repetitions), intensity (load or weight, typically a percentage of one-repetition maximum), duration, and velocity [193]. Although specific guidelines for children with cerebral palsy have not been developed, the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) guidelines for typically developing children are used as a reference for dosing parameters, as they are based on sound evidence and physiological principles that are safe and effective [193].

Reliability Statistics: The Kappa statistic for agreement between raters on end-feel classifications (springy vs non-springy) was 0.42, with a percent agreement of 68.4% [169]. The inter-rater reliability ICC for the Torque Angle Curve technique was .80 [169].

Clinical Presentation

General Principles and Examination Strategy

A careful physical examination is essential to direct care and future testing, as diagnostic tests such as imaging and serum laboratory studies can be expensive, time-consuming, and often nonspecific [18]. Patients often have difficulty accurately describing their symptoms and may incorrectly attribute pathology to a perceived deficit, whether real or imagined [18]. Physical outcome measures are being changed for the use of patient reported outcomes, and range of motion and strength are not as reliable measures as one would think [1]. The functional range of motion is important for directing indications for surgery and rehabilitation, and assessing outcome of treatment [2]. Assessments using range-of-motion measurements or a questionnaire are not sufficient to evaluate a patient's movement disorder, and a kinematic analysis should be conducted for quantitative assessments [125]. Those subjects with stenosing tenosynovitis demonstrate a significant decrease in maximum velocity in slow fist tasks, highlighting the need for comprehensive assessment to ascertain the full extent of functional limitations [108].

Strength Assessment

Decreased grip strength in a patient with “obscure” wrist pain is a reliable indicator of a pathologic process that deserves further investigation [21]. There is no substitute for manual testing for muscle length, and hand-held devices are not justified for grading strength except in a few instances [25]. Standard manual strength-testing of the intrinsic muscles of the hand was not diagnostically sensitive [94]. Not all muscles in the hand can be sufficiently isolated to grade their strength, nor is it always necessary to test all muscles innervated by a particular nerve to evaluate the presence or extent of motor function impairment or monitor changes [53]. Repeat testing appears essential for an accurate assessment of an individual's strength [49]. Rapid, repeated measurement of grip strength is not a reliable discriminator of true and faked hand weakness [30]. For the results of individual patients, the calculated Standard Error of Measurements and the Smallest Detectable Differences indicate that only relatively large changes in strength can be confidently detected with a hand-held dynamometer technique [48]. The majority of hands (256, or 89%) had a maximal grip strength at setting II [27]. The test-retest reliability of grip strength measurement in full elbow extension in healthy participants is excellent, demonstrating its potential for use in clinical practice [118]. Providers can use the strongest grip strength values obtained in clinical practice to compare with reported dominant hand grip strength values [105]. For use as a diagnostic tool, standardization and device-specific cutoff points for handgrip dynamometry are needed [110]. These findings suggest the need to consider how new features, unavailable with the analog Jamar dynamometer and unaccounted for in existing clinical guidelines, could potentially influence grip scores [9]. Numerous clinical and epidemiological studies have shown the predictive potential of hand grip strength regarding short and long-term mortality and morbidity [28]. Multifinger performance was not predictable from single-finger strengths, and the information derived may be helpful to clinically identify and isolate muscle pathology [115]. The measurement of extension grip strength is a useful objective tool to aid in the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis [41]. Most patients with CTS do not appear to have notable weakness of thumb abduction strength [40]. Measurement of thumb abduction strength may prove to be a useful adjunct to the various tests currently used by hand surgeons to assess hand function [50]. The study validates a repeatable technique for measuring palmar thumb abduction strength with excellent nonparametric reliability, though large differences between raters and a lack of variability in the sample limit clinical utility and require further study with a larger, more diverse population [51]. Although deQuervain's disease affects abductor and extensor tendons, strength and ROM of the thumbs were found to be decreased in all directions tested [123]. Affected hands demonstrated diminished results with FDT, and pinch strength when compared with previously published ranges for normals [126]. This new system that measures each finger's grip strength at one time and records the time course of grip motion could quantify a patient's symptoms easily and objectively, which may contribute to the evaluation of hand function [4]. Our findings support that we have presented a tool which can be used in future study within this population to better understand the hand kinetics associated with the highly problematic task of jar-opening and joint protection strategies intended to reduce hand loads [43].

Range of Motion and Functional Outcomes

Patients with arthritis experienced diminished range of motion and poorer patient-reported outcomes regarding general functioning and satisfaction, but no altered grip strength [5]. These measurements are related to a new classification system which, as movement and function improves, indicates the efficacy of management [20]. Pulley rupture or insufficiency is a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma owing to the overall rarity of the injury as well as the lack of comparative clinical studies describing its diagnosis, treatment, and outcome [23]. Function should be assessed with region-specific upper extremity patient reported outcome measure, with no consensus regarding which region-specific tool [52]. Assessment of hand strength has proved to be reliable and valid as an objective parameter to evaluate the functional integrity of the hand as part of the musculoskeletal system [55]. Hand strength measurement is clinically used to determine the effectiveness of different treatment strategies in traumatic hand diseases as well as in diseases affecting hand function because of their systemic or local degenerative character [55]. In most cases baseline grip strength as a pre-injury or pre-illness muscle strength is not known [55]. Referencing the opposite hand for comparison considers both hands to have similar pre-illness grip strength, which might be misleading and possibly underestimates changing of contralateral strength during the illness period [55]. Established normative data are used clinically to compare the patients to a healthy population to decide about the return to pre-injury or pre-illness hand strength [55]. The problems in predicting the functional capacity of the hand from scores on specialized sensory and motor tests suggest that more versatile measuring instruments are required [127].

Investigations

Range of Motion Assessment

Range of motion in the distal interphalangeal joint and hand grip strength in an individual patient are of little value for predicting isolated finger flexion force [3]. To ensure accurate comparison, the measured angular motion of each individual joint should be recorded [35]. The closed curve derived from a motion analysis system and the area calculated from it are easier to interpret and can be compared in serial examinations [17]. While the motion analysis system provides useful data about actual anatomical deficits in injured fingers by recording dynamic changes in joint angles, the evaluation is time-consuming [46]. Using standard clinical instruments, torque angle curves objectively measured the quantity and quality of stiffness of immobilized, otherwise healthy, human PIP joints [166]. The area under a Gaussian curve can serve as a more meaningful functional assessment tool than a linear measurement such as total active motion because it emphasizes digital motion in the mid-ranges of digital motion [189]. Video motion capture identified three movement phases of the hand during lateral and pulp pinches, providing insight into the dynamics of hand movement and a basis for evaluating movement patterns in activities of daily living [44].

Strength Assessment

A new system that measures each finger's grip strength at one time and records the time course of grip motion can quantify a patient's symptoms easily and objectively, contributing to the evaluation of hand function [4]. Most patients with carpal tunnel syndrome do not appear to have notable weakness of thumb abduction strength [40]. For results of individual patients, the calculated Standard Error of Measurements and the Smallest Detectable Differences indicate that only relatively large changes in strength can be confidently detected with a hand-held dynamometer technique for intrinsic muscles [48]. A repeatable technique for measuring palmar thumb abduction strength has excellent nonparametric reliability, though large differences between raters and a lack of variability in the sample limit clinical utility [51]. Greater strength measurements were generated with the elbow at 90° rather than 45° on the Jamar dynamometer [177].

Correlation with Outcomes and Pathology

More advanced radiographic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis severity is associated with lower grip strength and poorer self-reported functional outcomes [132]. Restoration of 'normal' radiographic parameters may not be necessary to achieve a satisfactory functional outcome for the patient with distal radius fractures [145]. Better final radiological and objective physical results were associated with a better patient-perceived outcome, as measured by the DASH score, in patients with displaced distal radius fractures [159]. Dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis does not consistently prevent radiographic deterioration and the development of arthrosis in the long-term; however, the level of functionality and patient satisfaction remained relatively high in 58% of patients, suggesting a lack of correlation between radiographic findings and functional outcomes [173]. Greater scapular dyskinesis is associated with lower hand grip strength [174]. Only patients with volar tilt and ulnar variance restored had a good functional outcome after distal radius fractures [188]. Most studies find no relationship between radiographic subsidence of an average of 5 millimeters and levels of strength, capability, comfort, or satisfaction after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty [180].

Clinical Examination Context

A careful physical examination is essential to direct care and future testing if indicated, as diagnostic tests such as imaging and serum laboratory studies can be expensive, time consuming, and often nonspecific [18]. Functional capacity evaluations should not replace the surgeon's determination of a patient's abilities based on objective physical examination and radiographic findings; the best form of assessing the ability to return to work is based on a competent physician's understanding of residual impairments combined with knowledge of the patient's work requirements [22].

Treatment

Assessment and Measurement

Physical outcome measures are shifting toward patient-reported outcomes, as range of motion and strength are not as reliable measures as previously thought [1]. Functional range of motion remains critical for directing indications for surgery and rehabilitation, and for assessing treatment outcomes [2]. When evaluating the robustness of outcome measures for upper extremity function, assessments should examine structure, function, patient-reported outcomes, morbidity/mortality, and cost [63]. However, no consensus exists regarding which region-specific tool to use for assessing function with region-specific upper extremity patient-reported outcome measures [52].

Grip and Strength Measurement: Therapists must be clear about why they wish to measure a person's grip strength and consider how an accurate and useful measurement can best be obtained [147]. New features in digital dynamometers, unavailable with the analog Jamar dynamometer and unaccounted for in existing clinical guidelines, could potentially influence grip scores [9]. The majority of hands (256, or 89%) had a maximal grip strength at setting II of the dynamometer [27]. Although the effects of type of outcome score were consistent, the statistically significant effects of forearm position and outcome score may be too small (<1 lb) to be clinically relevant [60]. The effects of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements appeared to be very minimal for normal subjects and rehabilitation patients [131]. There was no significant difference in strength between dominant and non-dominant hands [150].

Rehabilitation and Non-Operative Management

The mainstay of therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome should include active and passive joint range of motion, including stress-loading activities, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) desensitization techniques, or sensory reeducation or any combination of these therapies [84]. Compared with conventional rehabilitation, movement representation techniques increase pain relief, functional performance and range of motion [130]. An exercise regimen for carpometacarpal osteoarthritis was developed in accordance with American College of Sports Medicine guidelines to preserve CMC joint range of motion and increase the strength of the stabilizing muscles of the thumb [31]. Kinesiotaping alone resulted in significant improvement in symptoms and function compared to the control group in the first two months, but this improvement did not continue at the 3rd month and was not superior to other treatment groups [134]. The Relative Motion concept and orthoses have evolved from the 1980s to be widely embraced by hand therapists and surgeons worldwide for managing extensor and flexor tendon repairs, with considerable supportive evidence now available [167].

Operative Outcomes and Postoperative Protocols

Fracture Fixation and Rehabilitation: Volar locking plating enhances earlier recovery in range of motion and grip strength than intrafocal pinning for dorsally angulated, unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients [58]. A large registry study supports the hypothesis that early active motion rehabilitation may not lead to better range of motion long-term than passive motion protocols following flexor tendon repair [13]. During the initial 28 days after a closed extra-articular metacarpal fracture, an early controlled passive motion protocol led to a clinical and statistical significant reduction in fracture dorsal angulation and improvement in the fracture's ability to resist and bear 4-point bending loads without increasing the total callus area [186].

Arthroplasty and Joint Reconstruction: The volar approach for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty offers the advantages of maintaining the integrity of the extensor mechanism and allowing early postoperative motion [181]. Postoperative protocols for trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty involve a thumb cast for 3 weeks after suture removal, followed by non-resisted active range-of-motion exercises and gradually increasing strengthening exercises [158]. First ray stabilization with mini-tightrope appears to be a valuable solution to maintain good mobility in patients with low strength requirements on their daily lives [59].

Functional Considerations and Complications: The range of movement of the joint just proximal to a digital amputation was regained early, and at the end of one year the average recovery was still about 87% [32]. The use of low profile splints to limit wrist range of motion demonstrated a correlation between restricted wrist motion and functional ability [183]. The effect of blocking flexion of one finger on the other digits varied considerably between individuals, preventing the prediction of the effect of stiffness on hand strength [39]. Patients with shoulder impingement in their nondominant arm demonstrated a more global loss of range of motion compared with patients having impingement in their dominant arm [161].

Complications

Repair-site gap: A gap at the repair site exceeding three millimeters prevents the accrual of strength and stiffness that normally occurs with time [164]. However, a gap of this magnitude does not increase the prevalence of adhesions or impair the range of motion [164].

Distal radius fracture sequelae: Extra-articular malalignment following distal radius fractures is associated with pain and decreased grip strength [42]. Intra-articular gaps caused by fracture lines result in significant joint incongruity that could possibly interfere with wrist and hand function [42]. Resulting chondral lesions and increased pressure on the articular surface interfere with sagittal motion of the carpal bones, restricting the range of wrist movement [42]. Radial shortening results in loss of volar tilt, interferes with the function of the distal radioulnar joint, and can lead to midcarpal instability [42].

Posttraumatic arthritis: Patients with posttraumatic arthritis following distal radius fractures experienced diminished range of motion and poorer patient-reported outcomes regarding general functioning and satisfaction [5]. These patients did not experience altered grip strength [5].

Other Considerations: Cross-education effects on shoulder rotator muscle strength after shoulder stabilization surgery have no effect on functional outcomes [6]. Mid-frequency electrical muscle stimulation during immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has an unclear long-term impact on functional outcomes [54]. Loss of the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis motor units had no functional effect upon thumb pinch-strength or hand grip [143], though it had only a minimal adverse effect upon thumb movement [143]. Thumb strength is relatively preserved with carpal tunnel syndrome, which does not preferentially impair thumb abduction strength [171]. Fifty-eight percent of patients had good hand function results following trapeziectomy with ligamentoplasty stabilisation, although the spherical grip was the most difficult to restore [165]. The range of movement of the joint just proximal to a digital amputation was regained early, with an average recovery of about 87% at the end of one year [32]. EAM rehabilitation may not lead to better range of motion long-term than passive motion protocols following flexor tendon repair [13].

Recovery

Measurement and Assessment: Accurate assessment of hand strength requires repeat testing, as a single trial or the highest score of three trials is less accurate than the mean of three trials [49, 205]. Rapid, repeated measurement of grip strength is not a reliable discriminator between true and faked hand weakness [30]. A novel finger grip dynamometer system that measures each finger's grip strength simultaneously and records the time course of grip motion can quantify patient symptoms objectively [4]. In manual muscle testing of intrinsic hand muscles, the Medical Research Council scale is modified such that grade 3 indicates "full active range of motion" rather than "movement against gravity" [29]. Manual muscle testing of the hand typically evaluates a group of muscles rather than a single muscle in isolation [29].

Range of Motion: Functional range of motion is important for directing indications for surgery and rehabilitation and for assessing treatment outcomes [2]. Age is likely to have a significant effect on postoperative range of motion and strength [14]. Early active motion rehabilitation may not lead to better long-term range of motion than passive motion protocols following flexor tendon repair [13]. The increase in passive range of motion of a stiff joint is directly proportional to the total end range time, or the length of time the joint is held at its end range [66]. Volar locking plating enhances earlier recovery in range of motion compared to intrafocal pinning for dorsally angulated, unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients [58]. Patients with posttraumatic arthritis following distal radius fractures experienced diminished range of motion but no altered grip strength [5]. The range of movement of the joint proximal to a digital amputation is regained early, with an average recovery of approximately 87% at one year [32]. In the great majority of patients, idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms [202, 203].

Strength: Hand grip strength has predictive potential regarding short- and long-term mortality and morbidity [28]. Normative data for grip strength across the life course have been established [201]. Bilateral handgrip strength assessments may have clinical utility in guiding rehabilitation strategies after rotator cuff repair [62]. Mid-frequency electrical muscle stimulation during immobilization may prevent early deltoid muscle atrophy and promote early strength recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, though its long-term impact on functional outcomes remains unclear [54]. Isolated gracilis tendon harvesting is not associated with loss of strength [7].

Functional Outcomes and Rehabilitation: Good functional outcome and excellent knee-specific subjective outcome were found following isolated gracilis tendon harvesting [7]. Long-term improvement in patients with diabetes remained after carpal tunnel release to the same extent as for patients without diabetes [64]. An interval throwing progression should be gradual in nature and should not include maximum effort throws in the early phase of throwing [200]. Forty-seven (96%) of forty-nine shoulders had a good clinical result after distal release of deltoid muscle contracture [67]. At follow-up ranging from 8 to 18 years, 37 patients with ankle-joint injuries were clinically assessed as good, 9 as fair, and none as poor [204]. The conclusion of improved functional results with a new functional brace for Colles' fractures is not valid in the long run (13 weeks onwards), as there was no significant difference in pinch strength between brace and control groups at 13 and 26 weeks [154].

Key Evidence

  • [Paper] Physical outcome measures are being changed for the use of patient reported outcomes, and range of motion and strength are not as reliable measures as one would think. [1] (10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.017)
  • [L4] The functional range of motion is important for directing indications for surgery and rehabilitation, and assessing outcome of treatment. [2] (10.1177/1753193414533754)
  • [L4] Range of motion in the distal interphalangeal joint and hand grip strength in the individual patient are of little value for prediction of isolated finger flexion force. [3] (10.1016/s0363-5023(82)80016-6)
  • [L4] This new system that measures each finger's grip strength at one time and records the time course of grip motion could quantify a patient's symptoms easily and objectively, which may contribute to the evaluation of hand function. [4] (10.1186/s13018-020-01773-9)
  • [L3] Patients with arthritis experienced diminished range of motion and poorer patient-reported outcomes regarding general functioning and satisfaction, but no altered grip strength. [5] (10.1007/s00402-018-3046-2)
  • [L1] However, it has no effect on functional outcomes. [6] (10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.037)
  • [L3] Additionally, good functional outcome as well as excellent knee-specific subjective outcome was found. [7] (10.1007/s00167-019-05790-y)
  • [L4] It can assess the strength of various muscle groups following disease or surgery, determine the effectiveness of therapy, and detect old muscle injuries that have escaped detection by existing methods of diagnosis. [8] (10.2106/00004623-196345010-00011)
  • [L3] These findings suggest the need to consider how new features, unavailable with the analog Jamar dynamometer and unaccounted for in existing clinical guidelines, could potentially influence grip scores. [9] (10.1016/j.jht.2011.01.004)
  • [L4] [10] (10.1197/j.jht.2007.04.005)
  • [Paper] This paper discusses a method of controlled torque and joint position that has been used experimentally and clinically as a tool for objective assessment of passive range of motion. [11] (10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80363-2)
  • [L4] This large registry study supports the hypothesis that EAM rehabilitation may not lead to better range of motion long-term than passive motion protocols. [13] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.003)
  • [L4] Age will most likely have a significant effect on postoperative ROM and strength. [14] (10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.016)
  • [L4] The findings of this study suggest that the Latarjet procedure more commonly affects range of motion rather than shoulder and elbow strength. [15] (10.1177/17585732231165227)
  • [Paper] Consequently, patients using low-profile outriggers require more strength to initiate and maintain active movement opposite to the mobilizing force, even when dynamic-assist forces are equal. [16] (10.1016/s0894-1130(96)80021-4)
  • [L4] The closed curve derived from the motion analysis system and the area calculated from it were easier to interpret and could be compared in serial examinations. [17] (10.1016/s0266-7681(96)80139-2)
  • [L5] These measurements are related to a new classification system which, as movement and function improves, indicates the efficacy of management. [20] (10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.02.007)
  • [L4] Decreased grip strength in a patient with “obscure” wrist pain is a reliable indicator of a pathologic process that deserves further investigation. [21] (10.1016/0363-5023(88)90191-8)
  • [L5] Functional capacity evaluations should not replace the surgeon's determination of a patient's abilities based on objective physical examination and radiographic findings; the best form of assessing the ability to return to work is based on a competent physician's understanding of residual impairments combined with knowledge of the patient's work requirements. [22] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.008)
  • [L5] Pulley rupture or insufficiency is a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma owing to the overall rarity of the injury as well as the lack of comparative clinical studies describing its diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. [23] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.021)
  • [L5] Ideally, digits need sensation and freedom of motion to enable patients to use them effectively, and effective surgery restores biomechanical motions so patients have optimum use. [24] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.003)
  • [Paper] There is no substitute for manual testing for muscle length, and hand-held devices are not justified for grading strength except in a few instances. [25] (10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80088-3)
  • [L5] Improved understanding of this motion pattern may lead to changes in functional rehabilitation following injury and in surgical management. [26] (10.5435/00124635-201001000-00007)
  • [L4] The majority of hands (256, or 89%) had a maximal grip strength at setting II. [27] (10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80351-0)
  • [L4] Numerous clinical and epidemiological studies have shown the predictive potential of hand grip strength regarding short and long-term mortality and morbidity. [28] (10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.010)
  • [Paper] [29] (10.1197/j.jht.2006.07.024)
  • [L3] Rapid, repeated measurement of grip strength is not a reliable discriminator of true and faked hand weakness. [30] (10.1054/jhsb.2000.0433)
  • [L4] The exercise regimen was developed in accordance with recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for the development of individualized exercise prescriptions to preserve CMC joint range of motion and increase the strength of the stabilizing muscles of the thumb. [31] (10.1016/j.jht.2012.03.008)
  • [L3] The range of movement of the joint just proximal to the amputation was regained early, and at the end of one year the average recovery was still about 87%. [32] (10.1016/0266-7681(93)90211-w)
  • [L4] The study aimed to identify the specific amount of motion allowed within four different immobilization devices and the level of function allowed within each device to establish data for evidence-based decisions. [33] (10.1016/j.jht.2009.07.011)
  • [L4] Successful replantation for a radiocarpal joint amputation is associated with major restriction of motion, decreased strength, and moderate disability on functional outcome assessments. [34] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.017)
  • [L5] The measured angular motion of each individual joint also should be recorded for a more accurate comparison. [35] (10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80050-5)
  • [L4] More study of anatomical morphological patterns may explain the reason for variations in motion and grip- strength. [36] (10.1142/s2424835516500351)
  • [L4] The effect of blocking flexion of one finger on the other digits varied considerably between individuals, preventing the prediction of the effect of stiffness on hand strength. [39] (10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.11.005)
  • [L3] Most patients with CTS do not appear to have notable weakness of thumb abduction strength. [40] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.007)
  • [L3] The measurement of extension grip strength is a useful objective tool to aid in the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis. [41] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.010)
  • [L3] [42] (10.1177/1758998315574352)
  • [L4] Our findings support that we have presented a tool which can be used in future study within this population to better understand the hand kinetics associated with the highly problematic task of jar-opening and joint protection strategies intended to reduce hand loads. [43] (10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.012)
  • [L4] The results provide new insight to the dynamics of hand movement as well as a basis for subsequent evaluations of movement patterns performed in ADLs and instrumental ADLs. [44] (10.1007/s11552-013-9517-6)
  • [L4] The motion analysis system provides useful data about actual anatomical deficits in injured fingers by recording dynamic changes in joint angles, though the evaluation is time-consuming. [46] (10.1054/jhsb.1999.0344)
  • [L4] We have developed a system for measuring hand strength which is accurate and reliable, but easy and quick to operate. [47] (10.1016/s0266-7681(85)80052-8)
  • [L3] However, for the results of individual patients, the calculated Standard Error of Measurements and the Smallest Detectable Differences indicate that only relatively large changes in strength can be confidently detected with this technique. [48] (10.1054/jhsb.2000.0415)
  • [L4] Repeat testing appears essential for an accurate assessment of an individual's strength. [49] (10.1016/0363-5023(89)90071-3)
  • [L4] Measurement of thumb abduction strength may prove to be a useful adjunct to the various tests currently used by hand surgeons to assess hand function. [50] (10.1016/s0363-5023(97)80079-2)
  • [L5] The study validates a repeatable technique for measuring palmar thumb abduction strength with excellent nonparametric reliability, though large differences between raters and a lack of variability in the sample limit clinical utility and require further study with a larger, more diverse population. [51] (10.1016/j.jht.2018.09.010)
  • [L5] [52] (10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.008)
  • [L5] Not all muscles in the hand can be sufficiently isolated to grade their strength, nor is it always necessary to test all muscles innervated by a particular nerve to evaluate the presence or extent of motor function impairment or monitor changes. [53] (10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80005-3)
  • [L3] However, its long-term impact on functional outcomes remains unclear and warrants further investigation. [54] (10.1002/ksa.70303)
  • [L4] [55] (10.1177/1753193408099829)
  • [L2] VLP enhances earlier recovery in range of motion and grip strength than IFP. [58] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.005)
  • [L4] It appears to be a valuable solution, in order to maintain good mobility in patients with low strength requirements on their daily lives. [59] (10.1177/1558944716660555l)
  • [L4] Although the effects of type of outcome score were consistent, the statistically significant effects of forearm position and outcome score may be too small (<1 lb) to be clinically relevant. [60] (10.1197/s0894-1130(03)00159-5)
  • [L5] Achieving a functional and durable outcome requires proper patient selection, careful preoperative planning, and accurate implantation. [61] (10.1097/01.bth.0000131199.39073.2a)
  • [L2] These findings highlight the potential clinical utility of bilateral handgrip strength assessments in guiding rehabilitation strategies after rotator cuff repair. [62] (10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.010)
  • [L5] [63] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.006)
  • [L2] Long-term improvement in patients with diabetes remained after carpal tunnel release to the same extent as for patients without diabetes. [64] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.012)
  • [L4] No differences were observed among the LBP subgroups, and further studies with appropriate diagnostic procedures are needed to elucidate if different types of LBP are related to altered biomechanics, physiology, and function. [65] (10.3390/life11030226)
  • [L2] The increase in passive range of motion of a stiff joint is directly proportional to the length of time the joint is held at its end range, or total end range time (TERT). [66] (10.1016/j.jht.2011.12.003)
  • [L3] Forty-seven (96 per cent) of the forty-nine shoulders had a good clinical result after distal release of the contracture. [67] (10.2106/00004623-199802000-00010)
  • [L2] Limited joint mobility of the thumb and index finger may cause temporal changes in precision grip force control, which can lead to reduced manual dexterity. [88] (10.1016/j.jht.2013.05.007)
  • [L3] Standard manual strength-testing of the intrinsic muscles of the hand was not diagnostically sensitive. [94] (10.2106/00004623-199703000-00013)
  • [L3] Individuals with hand OA modulate grip force magnitude and temporal parameters but apply higher grip forces at liftoff and peak, and demonstrate longer latency compared to controls. [95] (10.1016/j.jht.2011.06.002)
  • [L4] Grip-load force adjustments are not completely determined by the mechanics of object motion; nonmechanical factors related to movement performance, for instance perceptual factors, may affect the coupling. [97] (10.1197/j.jht.2007.06.002)
  • [L4] The dynamic interaction of finger joints during cylinder grip shows specific patterns, with DIP joints consistently initiating flexion last and synchronization increasing significantly by the end of motion compared to the beginning. [98] (10.1177/1753193412444399)
  • [L4] The middle finger was the most important contributor to grip strength. [101] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.121)
  • [L4] Providers can use the strongest grip strength values obtained in clinical practice to compare with reported dominant hand grip strength values. [105] (10.1016/j.jht.2024.08.027)
  • [L5] At increasing amounts of finger flexion, progressive metacarpal shortening produces proportionally greater loss of fingertip flexion force. [106] (10.1177/1753193412461589)
  • [L4] [107] (10.1016/s0894-1130(99)80048-9)
  • [L3] Those subjects demonstrate a significant decrease in maximum velocity in slow fist tasks, highlighting the need for comprehensive assessment to ascertain the full extent of functional limitations that can occur in the setting of hand pathology. [108] (10.1177/1558944717729218)
  • [L3] For use as a diagnostic tool, standardization and device-specific cutoff points for handgrip dynamometry are needed. [110] (10.1371/journal.pone.0270132)
  • [L4] At a position of 30 of wrist extension, maximal grip strength is achieved without significantly compromising grip endurance. [111] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.100)
  • [L4] Multifinger performance was not predictable from single-finger strengths, and the information derived may be helpful to clinically identify and isolate muscle pathology. [115] (10.1197/j.jht.2008.02.002)
  • [L5] Simultaneous activation of the FDP and the intrinsic muscles results in an apparently more functional hand closing compared with FDP activation alone because of altered kinematics and larger fingertip-to-palm distances. [117] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.099)
  • [L4] The test-retest reliability of grip strength measurement in full elbow extension in healthy participants is excellent, demonstrating its potential for use in clinical practice. [118] (10.1177/1753193412449804)
  • [L4] Although this disease affects abductor and extensor tendons, strength and ROM of the thumbs were found to be decreased in all directions tested. [123] (10.1197/j.jht.2006.07.008)
  • [L3] Since assessments using range-of-motion measurements or a questionnaire are not sufficient to evaluate a patient's movement disorder, a kinematic analysis should be conducted for quantitative assessments. [125] (10.1177/1558944720949952)
  • [L4] Affected hands demonstrated diminished results with FDT, and pinch strength when compared with previously published ranges for normals. [126] (10.1197/j.jht.2003.10.034)
  • [L5] [127] (10.1016/0363-5023(89)90010-5)
  • [L5] Unless handheld dynamometry is widely adopted or a better grading system is developed and well validated, the MRC will continue to be used. [129] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.11.008)
  • [L1] Compared with conventional rehabilitation, movement representation techniques increase pain relief, functional performance and range of motion. [130] (10.1186/s12891-025-08496-0)
  • [L4] The effects of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements appeared to be very minimal for normal subjects and rehabilitation patients. [131] (10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80377-2)
  • [L3] More advanced radiographic trapeziometacarpal OA severity is associated with lower grip strength and poorer self-reported functional outcomes. [132] (10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.001)
  • [L2] Kinesiotaping alone resulted in significant improvement in symptoms and function compared to the control group in the first two months, but this improvement did not continue at the 3rd month and was not superior to other treatment groups. [134] (10.5152/tftrd.2014.24993)
  • [L2] From all analyzed motions, the highest FFM was found in external rotation in all groups. [135] (10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101288)
  • [L4] Strength of the thumb is affected in all types of triphalangeal thumb, although it is apparently sufficient in daily life for the investigated group. [139] (10.1177/1753193412438195)
  • [L5] Evidence-based administration and interpretation of grip strength assessment by rehabilitation professionals are essential components of comprehensive assessment across the continuum of care. [140] (10.1177/1558944716660555kr)
  • [Paper] The term "Stiffness" of a structure always requires an exact description of the load configuration and the exact localization and kind of deformation measured. [141] (10.1016/s0020-1383(00)80040-6)
  • [L4] Patients were able to return to regular activities with excellent range of motion and restored lifting capacity, reporting no pain and utmost satisfaction with the prosthesis. [142] (10.1016/j.hcl.2012.08.023)
  • [L4] Loss of the abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis motor units had no functional effect upon thumb pinch-strength or hand grip, and only a minimal adverse effect upon thumb movement. [143] (10.1054/jhsb.2001.0744)
  • [L2] Restoration of 'normal' radiographic parameters may not be necessary to achieve a satisfactory functional outcome for the patient. [145] (10.1302/0301-620x.99b3.35819)
  • [L4] This study emphasizes the need for standardized procedures when testing torque strength. [146] (10.1016/s0894-1130(87)80008-x)
  • [L5] Therapists need to be clear about why they wish to measure a person's grip strength and consider how an accurate and useful measurement can best be obtained. [147] (10.1177/175899830501000101)
  • [L4] The results indicate that the motion analysis system is a reliable tool for the evaluation of fingertip motion. [149] (10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80219-2)
  • [L4] There was no significant difference in strength between dominant and non-dominant hands. [150] (10.1016/0266-7681(93)90212-x)
  • [L4] In the fingers, only a small percentage of the active range of motion of the joints was required for functional tasks. [152] (10.1016/0363-5023(90)90102-w)
  • [L5] The author argues that the conclusion of improved functional results with the brace is not valid in the long run (13 weeks onwards), as Table VII shows no significant difference in pinch strength between brace and control groups at 13 and 26 weeks. [154] (10.1016/s0020-1383(97)83189-0)
  • [L4] [155] (10.1177/1753193413518709)
  • [L3] [158] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.016)
  • [L3] Better final radiological and objective physical results were associated with a better patient-perceived outcome, as measured by the DASH score, in this patient group. [159] (10.1197/j.jht.2007.06.001)
  • [L3] Patients with shoulder impingement in their nondominant arm demonstrated a more global loss of range of motion compared with patients having impingement in their dominant arm. [161] (10.1177/036354650002800501)
  • [L5] A gap at the repair site of more than three millimeters does not increase the prevalence of adhesions or impair the range of motion but does prevent the accrual of strength and stiffness that normally occurs with time. [164] (10.2106/00004623-199907000-00010)
  • [L4] Fifty-eight percent of patients had good hand function results, with the spherical grip being the most difficult to restore. [165] (10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.015)
  • [L4] Using standard clinical instruments, torque angle curves objectively measured the quantity and quality of stiffness of immobilized, otherwise healthy, human PIP joints. [166] (10.1016/s0894-1130(88)80050-4)
  • [L5] The Relative Motion concept and orthoses have evolved from the 1980s to be widely embraced by hand therapists and surgeons worldwide for managing extensor and flexor tendon repairs, with considerable supportive evidence now available. [167] (10.1016/j.jht.2023.03.006)
  • [L4] [169] (10.1177/175899830400900101)
  • [L1] [170] (10.1016/0020-1383(95)00111-l)
  • [L3] Thumb strength is relatively preserved with carpal tunnel syndrome, and the study failed to support the traditional belief that carpal tunnel syndrome preferentially impairs thumb abduction strength. [171] (10.1097/01.blo.0000181143.93681.0d)
  • [L4] The DILC does not consistently prevent radiographic deterioration and the development of arthrosis in the long-term; however, the level of functionality and patient satisfaction remained relatively high in 58% of our patients, suggesting a lack of correlation between the radiographic findings and development of arthrosis and the functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. [173] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.016)
  • [L4] This suggests greater the scapular dyskinesis, lower will be the hand grip strength. [174] (10.1177/17585732241309088)
  • [L4] Greater strength measurements were generated with the elbow at 90° rather than 45° on the Jamar. [177] (10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80029-2)
  • [L1] The observation that most studies find no relationship between radiographic subsidence of an average of 5 millimeters and levels of strength, capability, comfort, or satisfaction after TMC arthroplasty suggests that primary surgeries may not benefit from a focus on limiting subsidence and revision arthroplasty ought not be offered based on this radiographic measure. [180] (10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01264)
  • [L4] The volar approach offers the advantages of maintaining the integrity of the extensor mechanism and allowing early postoperative motion. [181] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.003)
  • [L3] The use of low profile splints to limit wrist range of motion did demonstrate a correlation between restricted wrist motion and functional ability. [183] (10.1016/j.jht.2009.07.002)
  • [L4] [185] (10.2106/00004623-197961040-00010)
  • [L5] During the initial 28 days after the fracture, the early controlled passive motion protocol led to a clinical and statistical significant reduction in fracture dorsal angulation and improvement in the fracture's ability to resist and bear 4-point bending loads without increasing the total callus area. [186] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.11.004)
  • [L4] Only patients with volar tilt and ulnar variance restored had a good functional outcome. [188] (10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.018)
  • [L4] The area under the Gaussian curve can serve as a more meaningful functional assessment tool than a linear measurement such as total active motion, because it emphasizes digital motion in the mid-ranges of digital motion. [189] (10.1053/jhsu.2001.21512)
  • [L4] [192] (10.1016/j.injury.2009.08.024)
  • [L4] [193] (10.1016/j.jht.2014.08.003)
  • [L5] The interval throwing progression should be gradual in nature and not include maximum effort throws in the early phase of throwing. [200] (10.1177/0363546514536693)
  • [L3] This is the first study to provide normative data for grip strength across the life course. [201] (10.1371/journal.pone.0113637)
  • [L4] In the great majority of patients idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition, in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms. [202] (10.2106/00004623-197860040-00030)
  • [L4] In the great majority of patients idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition, in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms. [203] (10.2106/00004623-197860040-00029)
  • [L4] At follow-up ranging from 8 to 18 years, 37 patients were clinically assessed as good, 9 as fair, and none as poor. [204] (10.1016/s0020-1383(69)80036-7)
  • [L4] The mean of three trials is a more accurate measure of hand strength than one trial or the highest score of three trials. [205] (10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80146-x)

See Also

References

[1] Physical outcome measures: The role of strength and range of motion in orthopaedic research. Injury. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.017

[2] The functional range of motion of the finger joints. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193414533754

[3] Finger flexion force and hand grip strength after tendon repair. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1982. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(82)80016-6

[4] Assessment of grip-motion characteristics in carpal tunnel syndrome patients using a novel finger grip dynamometer system. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01773-9

[5] Prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis following distal radius fractures in non-osteoporotic patients and the association with radiological measurements, clinician and patient-reported outcomes. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3046-2

[6] Cross-education effects on shoulder rotator muscle strength and function after shoulder stabilization surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.037

[7] Isolated gracilis tendon harvesting is not associated with loss of strength and maintains good functional outcome. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05790-y

[8] The Multiple Angle Testing Method for the Evaluation of Muscle Strength. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1963. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196345010-00011

[9] A Test Case: Does the Availability of Visual Feedback Impact Grip Strength Scores When Using a Digital Dynamometer?. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.01.004

[10] The Effects of Strength Training among Persons with Hand Osteoarthritis: a Two-Year Follow-up Study. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2007. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.04.005

[11] Torque range of motion in the hand clinic. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1990. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80363-2

[13] Range of Motion Following Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparing Active Flexion and Extension With Passive Flexion Using Rubber Bands Followed by Active Extension. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.003

[14] Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.016

[15] Strength after the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: Are shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion & supination strength decreased?. Shoulder & Elbow. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231165227

[16] Concerning active motion opposite to the pull of a mobilizing dynamic-assist force. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(96)80021-4

[17] The Motion Analysis System and The Maximal Area of Fingertip Motion. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(96)80139-2

[18] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Evaluation, Clinical Examination, and Imaging > Evaluation and Clinical Examination: Current Concepts.

[19] Chapter 29 Hand/Carpal Fractures and Dislocations. 2021.

[20] Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita: Functional Classification and the AMC Disc-O-Gram. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.02.007

[21] Measurement of grip strength in the diagnosis of wrist pain. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1988. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(88)90191-8

[22] Functional Capacity Evaluation in Hand Surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.008

[23] A2 Pulley Insufficiency. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.021

[24] Biomechanics of the Hand. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.003

[25] Manual muscle testing: There is no substitute. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1991. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80088-3

[26] The Advantage of Throwing the First Stone: How Understanding the Evolutionary Demands of Homo sapiens Is Helping Us Understand Carpal Motion. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2010. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201001000-00007

[27] Which setting of the dynamometer provides maximal grip strength?. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80351-0

[28] Hand grip strength: Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clinical Nutrition. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.010

[29] Strength Measurements of the Intrinsic Hand Muscles: A Review of the Development and Evaluation of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2006. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.07.024

[30] Rapid Repeat Testing of Grip Strength for Detection of Faked Hand Weakness. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0433

[31] An Exercise Program for Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Based on Biomechanical Principles. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.03.008

[32] Hand Function after Digital Amputation. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(93)90211-w

[33] Using the Surface Electromyographic Signal to Identify Maximal versus Submaximal Efforts in People with Upper Extremity Injuries. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.07.011

[34] Functional Outcomes of Replantation Following Radiocarpal Amputation. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.017

[35] The measuring of motions. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1980. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(80)80050-5

[36] Comparison of Wrist Motion and Grip Strength in a Normal Chinese and Caucasian Population. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2016. DOI: 10.1142/s2424835516500351

[37] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 9Hand Surgery > Image DISORDERS OF THE MUSCULATURE OF THE HAND.

[38] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. 1.1 SKELETON OF THE HAND > The osseous skeleton.

[39] The Effect of Flexor Digitorum Profundus Quadriga on Grip Strength. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.11.005

[40] Thumb Abduction Strength Measurement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.007

[41] Effect of Elbow Position on Grip Strength in the Evaluation of Lateral Epicondylitis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.010

[42] Pathomechanics of the wrist following fractures of the distal radius. Hand Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758998315574352

[43] Reliability and validity of a novel instrument for the quantification of hand forces during a jar opening task. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.012

[44] Identification of Three Movement Phases of the Hand during Lateral and Pulp Pinches Using Video Motion Capture. HAND. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-013-9517-6

[46] The Use of the Motion Analysis System for Evaluation of Loss of Movement in the Finger. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0344

[47] Clinical assessment of hand strength using a microcomputer. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British & European Volume. 1985. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(85)80052-8

[48] Strength of the Intrinsic Muscles of the Hand Measured with a Hand-Held Dynamometer: Reliability in Patients with Ulnar and Median Nerve Paralysis. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0415

[49] Fluctuation in grip and pinch strength among normal subjects. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90071-3

[50] Measurement of thumb abduction strength: Normative data and a comparison with grip and pinch strength. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1997. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(97)80079-2

[51] Clinical relevance commentary in response to: Intrarater and inter-rater reliability of a handheld dynamometric technique to quantify palmar thumb abduction strength in individuals with and without carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.09.010

[52] Assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: A modified Delphi-based consensus paper of the American Society of Hand Therapists. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.08.008

[53] Sensible manual muscle strength testing to evaluate and monitor strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand: A commentary. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80005-3

[54] Mid‐frequency electrical muscle stimulation during immobilization may prevent early deltoid muscle atrophy and promote early strength recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.70303

[55] Age- and Gender-Specific Normative Data of Grip and Pinch Strength in a Healthy Adult Swiss Population. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408099829

[58] A Comparative Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Dorsally Angulated, Unstable Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: Intrafocal Pinning Versus Volar Locking Plating. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.005

[59] First Ray Stabilization With Mini-Tightrope in the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716660555l

[60] Measurement of maximum voluntary pinch strength:. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2003. DOI: 10.1197/s0894-1130(03)00159-5

[61] Total Wrist Arthroplasty. Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1097/01.bth.0000131199.39073.2a

[62] Prognostic value of baseline muscle strength for functional recovery after rotator cuff repair: an observational study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.010

[63] Assessment of Upper Extremity Function. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.006

[64] Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Diabetes: A 5-Year Follow-Up With Matched Controls. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.012

[65] Physical Abilities in Low Back Pain Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study with Exploratory Comparison of Patient Subgroups. Life. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/life11030226

[66] Effect of Total End Range Time on Improving Passive Range of Motion. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.12.003

[67] Contracture of the Deltoid Muscle. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). 1998. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199802000-00010

[69] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. Functional cutaneous units.

[70] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. Interosseous and Hypothenar Muscles.

[73] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. The arches of the hand > The metacarpal arch.

[77] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 9Hand Surgery > FLEXOR TENDON INJURY.

[78] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. 1.3 MOVEMENTS OF THE HAND AND WRIST > Gliding mechanisms.

[79] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. The dorsal skin.

[81] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. The digital rays.

[84] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. A Practical Guide for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in the Acute Stage and Late Stage > Hand Therapy.

[88] The effect of finger joint hypomobility on precision grip force. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.05.007

[91] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. TRANSFER OF THE EXTENSOR INDICIS PROPRIUS AND EXTENSOR DIGITI QUINTI PROPRIUS > FINGER DEFORMITIES CAUSED BY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS.

[94] Side-to-Side Confrontational Strength-Testing for Weakness of the Intrinsic Muscles of the Hand. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1997. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199703000-00013

[95] Grip Force Control in Individuals with Hand Osteoarthritis. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2011.06.002

[97] Similar Motion of a Hand-held Object may Trigger Nonsimilar Grip Force Adjustments. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2007. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.06.002

[98] Dynamic aspects during the cylinder grip — flexion sequence of the finger joints analyzed using a sensor glove. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412444399

[101] Comparison of Grip Strength Among 6 Grip Methods. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.121

[105] GRIP STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE COMPARED TO ESTABLISHED NORMS: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.08.027

[106] The effect of metacarpal shortening on digital flexion force. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412461589

[107] Dynamic versus static grip strength: How grip strength changes when the wrist is moved, and why dynamic grip strength may be a more functional measurement. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1999. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(99)80048-9

[108] Dynamic Functional Assessment of Hand Motion Using an Animation Glove: The Effect of Stenosing Tenosynovitis. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717729218

[110] Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers. PLOS ONE. 2022. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270132

[111] The Effect of Wrist Position on Grip Endurance and Grip Strength. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.100

[115] Multifinger Ab- and Adduction Strength and Coordination. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2008. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2008.02.002

[117] Intrinsic Hand Muscle Function, Part 1: Creating a Functional Grasp. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.099

[118] Test–retest reliability of grip strength measurement in full elbow extension to evaluate maximum grip strength. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412449804

[123] Thumb Strength and Mobility in deQuervain's Disease. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2006. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.07.008

[125] Kinematic Analyses Using Finger-Tapping Task for Patients After Surgery With Distal Radius Fracture at Acute Phase. HAND. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720949952

[126] Use of the Functional Dexterity Test for outcomes with thumb aplasia. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2004. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2003.10.034

[127] The assessment of hand function: A critical review of techniques. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90010-5

[129] Use of the Medical Research Council Muscle Strength Grading System in the Upper Extremity. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.11.008

[130] Evaluating the impact of movement representation techniques on recovery outcomes in post-orthopaedic surgery individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08496-0

[131] Effects of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1990. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80377-2

[132] Pain, function, and radiographic disease in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.001

[134] Efficacy of Kinesiotaping on Symptoms, Hand Functions, and Hand Grip Strength in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Study. Türkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2014. DOI: 10.5152/tftrd.2014.24993

[135] Fossa-Foveolar Mismatch Is Highest in Dysplastic Hips and During External Rotation. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101288

[139] Thumb strength in all types of triphalangeal thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412438195

[140] Assessment of Grip Strength Across the Continuum of Care. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716660555kr

[141] Stiffness — an unknown world of mechanical science?. Injury. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)80040-6

[142] Distal Radioulnar Joint Constrained Arthroplasty. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.08.023

[143] Thumb Function without the Abductor Pollicis Longus and Extensor Pollicis Brevis. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2002. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0744

[145] Do radiological and functional outcomes correlate for fractures of the distal radius?. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b3.35819

[146] Comparison of torque strength measurements on two evaluation devices. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1987. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(87)80008-x

[147] What can Handgrip Strength tell the Therapist about Hand Function?. The British Journal of Hand Therapy. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/175899830501000101

[149] The Motion Analysis System and the Fingertip Motion Area. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80219-2

[150] Grip Strength and Hand Position of the Dynamometer in 204 Finnish Adults. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(93)90212-x

[152] Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(90)90102-w

[154] A new functional brace for the treatment of Colles' fractures. Injury. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)83189-0

[155] Severity grading in radial dysplasia. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413518709

[158] Short-Term Outcomes of Trapeziometacarpal Artelon Implant Compared With Tendon Suspension Interposition Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: A Matched Cohort Study. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.016

[159] Patient-perceived Outcome after Displaced Distal Radius Fractures. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2007. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.06.001

[161] Quantification of Posterior Capsule Tightness and Motion Loss in Patients with Shoulder Impingement. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000. DOI: 10.1177/036354650002800501

[164] The Effect of Gap Formation at the Repair Site on the Strength and Excursion of Intrasynovial Flexor Tendons. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE EARLY STAGES OF TENDON-HEALING IN DOGS. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1999. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00010

[165] Prognostic factors for the recovery of hand function following trapeziectomy with ligamentoplasty stabilisation. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.015

[166] The use of torque angle curves in the assessment of digital joint stiffness. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1988. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(88)80050-4

[167] The ongoing evolution of a clinical innovation: Relative motion concept and orthoses. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.03.006

[169] Measurement of Joint Stiffness in the Hand: A Preliminary Investigation of the Reliability and Validity of Torque Angle Curves. The British Journal of Hand Therapy. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/175899830400900101

[170] A new functional brace for the treatment of Colles' fractures. Injury. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00111-l

[171] Thumb Strength Affected by Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000181143.93681.0d

[173] Long-Term Outcomes of Dorsal Intercarpal Ligament Capsulodesis for Chronic Scapholunate Dissociation. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.016

[174] Correlation of scapular Dyskinesia and hand grip strength in students with smartphone addiction pursuing a bachelor's degree in healthcare profession education. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241309088

[177] Grip strength testing using the BTE work simulator and the jamar dynamometer: A comparative study. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80029-2

[180] Subsidence after Trapeziometacarpal Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2024. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01264

[181] Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Using a Volar Approach: Case Series. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.003

[183] Functional_Disability_of_the_Wrist_Direct_Correlation_with_Decreased_Wrist_Motio_S0894113009000799. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.07.002

[185] Movement patterns of interosseus-minus fingers.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1979. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197961040-00010

[186] Early Controlled Passive Motion Improves Early Fracture Alignment and Structural Properties in a Closed Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fracture in a Rabbit Model. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.11.004

[188] Is it really necessary to restore radial anatomic parameters after distal radius fractures?. Injury. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.018

[189] The Littler line method and the area under a Gaussian curve: A new method of assessing digital range of motion. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.21512

[192] Locked volar plating for unstable distal radial fractures: Clinical and radiological outcomes. Injury. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.08.024

[193] Addressing muscle performance impairments in cerebral palsy: Implications for upper extremity resistance training. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.08.003

[200] Interval Throwing Program and Baseball Pitching: Response. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514536693

[201] Grip Strength across the Life Course: Normative Data from Twelve British Studies. PLoS ONE. 2014. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637

[202] Brief Note The Natural History of 'Idiopathic' Frozen Shoulder. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860040-00030

[203] The natural history of 'idiopathic' frozen shoulder.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860040-00029

[204] Ankle-joint injuries. Injury. 1969. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(69)80036-7

[205] Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1984. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80146-x

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.