Pectoralis Major Rupture¶
Pectoralis major tendon rupture and repair (corpus-synthesised).
Overview¶
Surgical repair is the definitive treatment for clinical pectoralis major ruptures, offering superior strength and functional outcomes compared to nonoperative management [1, 3, 6, 7]. This benefit extends to both acute and chronic presentations, with no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two operative groups [3]. Early anatomic repair is particularly critical for total and near-total ruptures to achieve optimal results [4], and is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures in athletes [9]. While early intervention is preferred, successful repair remains feasible even 13 years after the initial injury [2].
The procedure is associated with a complication rate of 14.21% [6, 7] but can be performed safely with low re-rupture rates [5]. Early surgical repair combined with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol reliably restores shoulder function and strength, facilitating an early return to sports and functional activity [10]. In specific populations, such as military service members, repair using intramedullary suture anchors yields high rates of return to duty, high patient satisfaction, and superior patient-reported outcomes [17]. Total ruptures in athletes demonstrate significantly better outcomes with surgical treatment based on the Bak criteria compared to nonoperative care [8].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
The distal pectoralis major tendon exhibits a 'U' shape comprised of an anterior layer (clavicular head and, to a lesser extent, sternal head) and a posterior layer (sternal head) that fuse proximal to the distal tendon attachment on the humerus [13]. The humeral insertion consists of a unilaminar fibrocartilaginous enthesis [24]. Ultrasound provides fresh insights on the role of evaluating pectoralis major anatomy and tendon attachment to bone [27].
Classification: A contemporary injury classification system for pectoralis major tears includes injury timing, injury location, and standardized terminology addressing tear extent to reflect musculotendinous morphology [21]. A new classification of pectoralis major injury has been proposed specifically for isolated tears of the sternocostal head [18].
Diagnostic Testing: The Pectoralis Major Index (PMI) technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears [12].
Surgical Timing and Outcomes: Anatomic surgical repair is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures of the pectoralis major tendon or muscle in athletes [9]. Early surgical repair of distal pectoralis major tendon ruptures combined with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol provides reliable restoration of shoulder function and strength [10]. Surgical repair of pectoralis major tears results in significant improvements in shoulder function [22]. Surgical repair of pectoralis major tendon ruptures can be successfully performed 13 years after the initial injury [2]. A statistically significant decrease in player performance was observed after surgically treated pectoralis major tears, though this difference was no longer seen after stratification by position type and draft selection [29].
Biomechanical Repair Constructs: A locking whipstitch of the pectoralis major tendon over a length of 6 cm provides superior biomechanical properties at time zero compared to 2 cm or 4 cm lengths [23]. Augmentation of pectoralis major tendon repair with an acellular dermal matrix significantly increases the ultimate load to failure compared to standard repair [26]. Augmentation of pectoralis major tendon repair with an acellular dermal matrix achieves biomechanical properties equivalent to the native tendon [26]. Repair constructs utilizing larger caliber suture and suture tape provide a measurable improvement in construct strength versus traditional pectoralis major repair techniques [28]. The cortical button repair method for pectoralis major tendon ruptures may be associated with better long-term pain and functional outcomes compared to the transosseous tunnel repair method [30].
Classification¶
Surgical Outcome Classification: Surgical repair provides superior results compared to conservative treatment for patients with a clinical diagnosis of pectoralis major rupture in terms of regaining strength and functional outcome [1]. Operative treatment for acute or chronic pectoralis major ruptures yields significantly better outcomes than nonoperative treatment [3]. There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between acute and chronic operative groups for pectoralis major ruptures [3]. Early surgical treatment via anatomic repair provides the best results for total and near-total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle [4]. Total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle exhibit better outcomes with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment in athletes based on the Bak criteria [8]. Anatomic surgical repair is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures of the pectoralis major tendon or muscle in athletes [9]. Surgical repair of pectoralis major tendon ruptures can be performed safely with a low re-rupture rate and low risk of complications [5].
Anatomic Morphology: The distal pectoralis major tendon exhibits a 'U' shape comprised of an anterior layer (clavicular head and, to a lesser extent, sternal head) and a posterior layer (sternal head) that fuse proximal to the distal tendon attachment on the humerus [13].
Diagnostic and Injury Classification Systems: The Pectoralis Major Index (PMI) technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears [12]. MRI is accurate for diagnosing the tear grade and location of pectoralis major tendon ruptures, particularly for acute, tendon-bone, and G3 tears [16]. A new classification of pectoralis major injury has been proposed specifically for isolated tears of the sternocostal head [18]. A contemporary injury classification system for pectoralis major tears includes injury timing, injury location, and standardized terminology addressing tear extent to reflect musculotendinous morphology [21].
Other Considerations: Steer wrestlers represent a unique cohort of pectoralis major rupture case studies [11].
Clinical Presentation¶
Surgical repair is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures of the pectoralis major tendon or muscle in athletes, providing superior strength and functional outcomes compared to nonoperative management [1][3][6][7][8][9]. Early anatomic repair yields the best results for total and near-total ruptures, with outcomes for acute and chronic operative groups showing no statistically significant difference [3][4]. While loss of strength is not complete with conservative treatment, operative repair is essential to restore complete function and contour, particularly in young athletes [15]. Repair can be successfully performed even 13 years after the initial injury, though early intervention with anatomic repair and accelerated rehabilitation protocols reliably restores shoulder function, strength, and allows for an early return to sports [2][10].
Diagnostic accuracy is supported by MRI, which is particularly effective for identifying acute, tendon-bone, and G3 tears [16]. The Pectoralis Major Index (PMI) serves as a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical test for structurally significant tears [12], while the Cruciform Test offers a simple, reproducible indicator of both rupture and successful repair [19]. Anatomically, the distal tendon exhibits a 'U' shape with anterior (clavicular and sternal heads) and posterior (sternal head) layers that fuse proximal to the humeral attachment [13]. Prognosis is unrelated to patient age or rupture location [20].
Complications following surgical repair occur in 14.21% of cases, though the procedure remains safe with low re-rupture and complication rates [5][6][7]. Steer wrestlers represent a unique cohort for case studies [11]. In rare instances of compartment syndrome, prompt recognition and decompression followed by delayed tendon repair can result in a successful return to normal function [14].
Investigations¶
Plain radiography: No specific plain radiographic signs or indications are supported by the provided evidence base for pectoralis major rupture.
MRI: MRI is accurate for diagnosing the tear grade and location of pectoralis major tendon ruptures [16]. It is particularly accurate for diagnosing acute, tendon-bone, and G3 tears of the pectoralis major tendon [16].
Other Considerations: The Pectoralis Major Index (PMI) technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears [12]. The Cruciform Test is a simple and reproducible diagnostic tool with potential as a clinical indicator of pectoralis major rupture [19] and has potential as a clinical indicator of successful pectoralis major repair [19]. Anatomically, the distal pectoralis major tendon has a 'U' shape comprised of an anterior layer (clavicular head and, to a lesser extent, sternal head) and a posterior layer (sternal head) [13]. The anterior and posterior layers of the distal pectoralis major tendon fuse proximal (medial) to the distal tendon attachment on the humerus [13]. Surgical repair provides superior results in regaining strength and functional outcome for patients with a clinical diagnosis of pectoralis major rupture [1]. Patients treated operatively for acute or chronic pectoralis major ruptures fare significantly better than those treated nonoperatively [3], with repair resulting in significantly superior outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment [6, 7]. Early surgical treatment by anatomic repair yields the best results for total and near-total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle [4]. Anatomic surgical repair is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures of the pectoralis major tendon or muscle in athletes [9]. Surgical repair of the ruptured pectoralis major muscle is important to restore complete function and contour, especially in young athletes [15], though loss of strength is not complete in conservative treatment [15]. Surgical repair can be successfully performed 13 years after the initial injury [2], and there is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between acute and chronic operative groups [3]. Surgical repair can be performed safely with a low re-rupture rate and low risk of complications [5], with a complication rate associated with pectoralis major tendon repair of 14.21% [6, 7]. Prompt recognition and decompression of pectoral/upper arm compartment syndrome followed by delayed pectoralis major tendon repair can result in a successful return to normal function [14]. Steer wrestlers represent a unique cohort of pectoralis major rupture case studies [11].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative¶
Conservative management of pectoralis major rupture results in incomplete restoration of strength [15]. Operative treatment yields significantly superior functional outcomes and strength recovery compared to nonoperative care for both acute and chronic ruptures [3, 6, 7]. In athletes specifically, total ruptures demonstrate better outcomes with surgical intervention based on the Bak criteria [8].
Operative¶
Indications: Surgical repair is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures of the pectoralis major tendon or muscle in athletes [9]. Early anatomic repair provides the best results for total and near-total ruptures [4]. Surgical intervention is critical to restore complete function and contour, particularly in young athletes [15].
Surgical Approach / Technique: Anatomic surgical repair is the preferred technique for complete acute ruptures [9]. Early surgical repair combined with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol reliably restores shoulder function and strength [10]. This approach also facilitates an early return to sports and functional activity [10]. Repair can be successfully performed even 13 years after the initial injury [2].
Implant Selection: Repair using intramedullary suture anchors demonstrates high rates of return to duty, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes [17].
Complications: Surgical repair is associated with a 14.21% complication rate [6, 7]. Despite these risks, repair can be performed safely with a low re-rupture rate and low risk of complications [5].
Outcomes: Patients treated operatively for acute or chronic ruptures fare significantly better than those treated nonoperatively [3]. There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between acute and chronic operative groups [3]. Surgical treatment of acute ruptures results in high levels of return to work and sport [25].
Complications¶
General Complications: Surgical repair of pectoralis major tendon ruptures is associated with a low risk of complications [5] and a low re-rupture rate [5]. However, the overall complication rate for pectoralis major tendon repair is reported at 14.21% [6, 7].
Compartment Syndrome: Compartment syndrome secondary to acute pectoralis major tendon rupture is a documented complication [14]. Prompt recognition and decompression of pectoral/upper arm compartment syndrome followed by delayed pectoralis major tendon repair can result in a successful return to normal function [14].
Other Considerations: No evidence provided for infection, aseptic loosening, instability, periprosthetic fracture, thromboembolism, patellar/extensor-mechanism issues, stiffness/arthrofibrosis, nerve palsy, wound complications, or polyethylene wear.
Recovery¶
Surgical outcomes: Surgical repair provides superior results in terms of regaining strength and functional outcome compared to conservative treatment for patients with a clinical diagnosis of pectoralis major rupture [1]. Operative treatment for acute or chronic pectoralis major ruptures results in significantly better outcomes than nonoperative treatment [3]. Pectoralis major tendon repair results in significantly superior outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment [6, 7]. Total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle exhibit better outcomes with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment in athletes based on the Bak criteria [8]. Early surgical treatment by anatomic repair yields the best results for total and near-total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle [4]. There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between acute and chronic operative groups for pectoralis major ruptures [3].
Rehabilitation protocol: Early surgical repair of distal pectoralis major tendon ruptures combined with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol provides reliable restoration of shoulder function and strength [10]. This approach allows for an early return to sports and functional activity [10]. Surgical repair of pectoralis major tendon ruptures can be performed safely with a low re-rupture rate and low risk of complications [5]. Pectoralis major tendon repair is associated with a 14.21% complication rate [6, 7]. Prompt recognition and decompression of pectoral/upper arm compartment syndrome followed by delayed pectoralis major tendon repair can result in a successful return to normal function [14].
Functional milestones: The prognosis of pectoralis major rupture is related neither to the age of the patient nor to the location of the rupture [20]. Among military personnel, Army soldiers and junior officer/enlisted rank are at the highest risk of pectoralis major tendon ruptures [31]. Among military personnel, junior personnel are at the highest risk of being unable to return to duty after surgical treatment [31].
Key Evidence¶
- [L3] We therefore conclude that, in a patient with the clinical diagnosis of rupture of the pectoralis major, surgical repair will give the best results in terms of regaining strength and functional outcome. (10.1136/bjsm.35.3.202)
- [L4] Repair of a pectoralis major muscle rupture was successfully performed 13 years after the initial injury. (10.1177/03635465000280021901)
- [L3] Patients treated operatively for acute or chronic pectoralis major ruptures fared significantly better than those treated nonoperatively, with no statistically significant difference in outcomes between acute and chronic operative groups. (10.1177/03635465000280012701)
- [L4] Early surgical treatment by anatomic repair gives the best results in the treatment of total and near-total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle. (10.1177/0363546503261137)
- [L4] Surgical repair of pectoralis major tendon ruptures can be performed safely with a low re-rupture rate and low risk of complications. (10.1177/2325967117s00242)
- [L1] Pectoralis major tendon repair resulted in significantly superior outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment, with an associated 14.21% complication rate. (10.1177/2325967119900813)
- [L1] Pectoralis major tendon repair resulted in significantly superior outcomes as compared to nonoperative treatment with an associated 14.21% complication rate. (10.1177/2325967120s00411)
- [L2] Total ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle exhibit better outcomes with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment based on the Bak criteria in athletes. (10.1177/0363546513506556)
- [L4] In summary, anatomic surgical repair is the treatment of choice for complete acute ruptures of the pectoralis major tendon or muscle in athletes. (10.2147/oajsm.s9066)
- [L4] Early surgical repair of distal pectoralis major tendon ruptures and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol provide reliable restoration of shoulder function and strength, allowing an early return to sports and functional activity. (10.1007/s00264-006-0171-2)
- [L4] Steer wrestlers represent a unique cohort of pectoralis major rupture case studies. (10.1155/2013/987910)
- [L2] The PMI technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears. (10.1177/2325967113516729)
- [L5] New anatomic descriptions of the distal pectoralis major tendon detail a ' U ' shape of the distal tendon comprised of anterior layer (the clavicular head and, to a lesser extent, the sternal head) and posterior layer (the sternal head), which fuse proximal (i.e., medial) to the distal tendon attachment on the humerus. (10.1007/s00256-014-1990-7)
- [L4] Our case demonstrates that prompt recognition and decompression of pectoral/upper arm compartment syndrome, followed by delayed pectoralis major tendon repair, can result in a successful return to normal function. (10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.023)
- [L3] MRI is accurate for diagnosing the tear grade and location of pectoralis major tendon ruptures, particularly for acute, tendon-bone, and G3 tears. (10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.037)
- [L4] Repair of the pectoralis major tendon ruptures using intramedullary suture anchors has high rates of return to duty, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.029)
- [L4] The authors propose a new classification of pectoralis major injury and present a biomechanically sound repair technique for isolated tears of the sternocostal head with favorable outcomes. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.024)
- [L4] The Cruciform Test is a simple and reproducible diagnostic tool that has potential as a clinical indicator of both pectoralis major rupture and successful repair. (10.1177/17585732211058457)
- [L1] The prognosis is related neither to the age of the patient nor to the location of the rupture. (10.1007/s001670050197)
- [L4] A contemporary injury classification system is proposed that includes injury timing, injury location, and standardized terminology addressing tear extent to more accurately reflect the musculotendinous morphology of PM injuries and better inform surgical management, rehabilitation, and research. (10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.035)
- [L3] Patients undergoing repair of the PMM are expected to have significant improvements in function of the shoulder. (10.1177/2325967119s00252)
- [L5] A locking whipstitch of the PM tendon over a length of 6 cm provides superior biomechanical properties at time zero compared to 2 cm or 4 cm lengths. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.045)
- [L5] The PM tendon humeral insertion consists of a unilaminar fibrocartilaginous enthesis. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.020)
- [L5] Surgical treatment of acute ruptures is superior to nonsurgical treatment and results in improved functional outcomes and high levels of return to work and sport. (10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00541)
- [L5] Augmentation of pectoralis major tendon repair with an acellular dermal matrix significantly increases the ultimate load to failure compared to standard repair and achieves biomechanical properties equivalent to the native tendon. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.020)
- [L4] Fresh insights are provided on the role of US in evaluating PM anatomy and tendon attachment to bone. (10.1007/s00590-014-1451-y)
- [L5] Repair constructs with larger caliber suture and suture tape provide a measurable improvement in construct strength versus traditional PM repair techniques in a biomechanical model. (10.1177/0363546517716175)
- [L4] Although we found a statistically significant decrease in player performance after surgery, this difference was no longer seen after players were stratified by position type and draft selection. (10.1016/j.asmr.2022.07.009)
- [L4] The cortical button repair method for pectoralis major tendon ruptures may be associated with better long-term pain and functional outcomes as reported on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand surveys compared to the transosseous tunnel repair method, but further investigation is needed. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100742)
- [L3] Among military personnel, Army soldiers and junior officer/enlisted rank were at highest risk of pectoralis major tendon ruptures, and junior personnel were at highest risk of being unable to return to duty after surgical treatment. (10.1177/0363546516637177)
References¶
[1] Pectoralis major tears: comparison of surgical and conservative treatment. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2001. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.35.3.202
[2] Delayed Repair of a Ruptured Pectoralis Major Muscle. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000. DOI: 10.1177/03635465000280021901
[3] Rupture of the Pectoralis Major Muscle. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000. DOI: 10.1177/03635465000280012701
[4] Rupture of the Pectoralis Major Muscle. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/0363546503261137
[5] Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Ruptures: A Retrospective Review of 134 Patients Tendon Ruptures. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117s00242
[6] Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119900813
[7] Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120s00411
[8] Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513506556
[9] Surgical and nonsurgical treatment of total rupture of the pectoralis major muscle in athletes: update and critical appraisal. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010. DOI: 10.2147/oajsm.s9066
[10] Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle: Surgical treatment in athletes. International Orthopaedics. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0171-2
[11] Retrospective Review of Pectoralis Major Ruptures in Rodeo Steer Wrestlers. Advances in Orthopedics. 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/987910
[12] Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/2325967113516729
[13] Pectoralis major tears: anatomy, classification, and diagnosis with ultrasound and MR imaging. Skeletal Radiology. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1990-7
[14] Compartment syndrome secondary to acute pectoralis major tendon rupture. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.023
[15] Rupture of Pectoralis Major Muscle: A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE.. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 1970.
[16] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the intraoperative tear characteristics of pectoralis major ruptures. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.037
[17] Pectoralis major tendon rupture repairs using intramedullary suture anchors shows high patient-reported outcomes in military service members. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.029
[18] Isolated tears of the sternocostal head of the pectoralis major muscle: surgical technique, clinical outcomes, and a modification of the Tietjen and Bak classification. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.024
[19] The ‘Cruciform Test’: A diagnostic tool to detect pectoralis major rupture. Shoulder & Elbow. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17585732211058457
[20] Rupture of the pectoralis major: a meta‐analysis of 112 cases. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2000. DOI: 10.1007/s001670050197
[21] A systematic review and comprehensive classification of pectoralis major tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.035
[22] Return to Sport and Exercise Following Repair of the Pectoralis Major Tendon. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119s00252
[23] Pectoralis major tendon tears: a biomechanical study to analyze the influence of intratendinous suture distance on repair stability. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.045
[24] Pectoralis major tendon and enthesis: anatomic, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonographic, and histologic investigation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.020
[25] Pectoralis Major Rupture: Evaluation and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00541
[26] Acellular dermal matrix augmentation significantly increases ultimate load to failure of pectoralis major tendon repair: a biomechanical study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.020
[27] Surgical repair of acute and chronic pectoralis major tendon rupture: clinical and ultrasound outcomes at a mean follow-up of 5 years. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1451-y
[28] Pectoralis Major Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis of Modern Repair Configurations Versus Traditional Repair Configuration. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517716175
[29] Surgically Treated Pectoralis Major Tears Impact the Play and Performance of National Football League Athletes. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.07.009
[30] Pectoralis major tendon repair outcomes: comparison of transosseous tunnel and cortical button fixation techniques. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100742
[31] Incidence Rate and Results of the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Ruptures in Active-Duty Military Personnel. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516637177