Arthroscopy & Endoscopy¶
Elbow arthroscopy: indications for loose bodies, OCD, epicondylitis, and PL impingement; technique & complication mitigation.
Overview¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy represents the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy, making surgery under endoscopic control a practical reality [1]. Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a primarily diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. The arthroscopic technique for tennis elbow release provides satisfactory results in most patients and yields outcomes superior to other measures [18]. Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow may produce results superior to open release when performed by experienced surgeons with proper indications [3]. Arthroscopic debridement of the arthritic elbow shows no increase in complications compared to open techniques, confirming its safety and efficacy [6].
Elbow arthroscopy is considered a relatively safe procedure [13]. Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases [2]. Major complications occur in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery [4]. However, elbow arthroscopy has a 0.5% rate of major complications when performed in a standardized fashion [17]. Systematic reviews demonstrate varying complication rates after elbow arthroscopy, with a median of 3% and a range of 0%-71% [20]. Reoperation rates after elbow arthroscopy have a median of 2% and a range of 0%-59% [20].
Elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure with low complication rates in community-based practice [14]. Elbow arthroscopy has an acceptable safety profile in the pediatric population [23]. Careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection is required to avoid neurovascular complications in elbow arthroscopy [8].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Elbow arthroscopy demands precise attention to surgical anatomy to prevent neurovascular complications [8]. Safe performance of the procedure relies on comprehensive knowledge of articular and periarticular structures [9]. A clear understanding of anatomy is essential to safely access the joint [36]. Enhanced anatomical knowledge underpins the safety and efficacy of elbow arthroscopy for treating elbow pathology [37].
Portal Approach: Needle arthroscopy via an anterior transbrachial portal enables complete visualization of the anterior and posterolateral compartments through the humerus-radius-ulna space [34].
Capsular Release: Endoscopic anterior capsulectomy for severe elbow contractures must be performed by surgeons familiar with neurovascular and musculoligamentous anatomy [30]. Arthroscopic capsular release requires specific knowledge of neurovascular anatomy to prevent severe nerve injuries [44].
Classification¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy represents the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1], and surgery under endoscopic control is now a practical reality [1]. Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the elbow is an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions [10].
Elbow Arthroscopy Complications: Complications of elbow arthroscopy occur in approximately 14% of cases [2, 4]. Major complications in elbow arthroscopy occur in 5% of cases [4] and often require repeat surgery [4]. Most complications of elbow arthroscopy are minor [4].
Plica Syndrome: Diagnosis of plica syndrome rests on clinical history and physical examination [5]. Diagnosis of plica syndrome is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy [5].
Post-Traumatic Stiff Elbow: Arthroscopic management of post-traumatic stiff elbow may produce satisfactory results with both open and arthroscopic techniques [3]. Arthroscopy by experienced surgeons produces results superior to open release for post-traumatic stiff elbow given proper indications [3].
Loose Bodies: Elbow arthroscopy is most successful for removing loose bodies [10].
Tennis Elbow: Arthroscopic tennis elbow release is an excellent addition to the surgeon's armamentarium [18]. Arthroscopic tennis elbow release yields satisfactory results in most patients [18] and yields results superior to other measures [18].
Posterolateral Rotatory Instability (PLRI): A new intraoperative arthroscopic classification tool exists for posterolateral elbow instability (PLRI) [31]. This classification tool serves as a standardized grading system for further research and communication between orthopedic surgeons [31].
Safety and Technique: Elbow arthroscopy requires careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of articular and periarticular anatomy [9]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with precise surgical technique [9]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with understanding of the procedure's limitations [9].
Clinical Presentation¶
Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Therapeutic arthroscopy is the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1], and surgery under endoscopic control is a practical reality [1]. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the elbow is an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions [10]. Arthroscopy of the elbow provides diagnostic benefits for loose bodies and synovitis [26]. Arthroscopy of the elbow provides therapeutic benefits for loose bodies and synovitis [26]. Arthroscopy of the elbow is most successful for removing loose bodies [10].
Complication Profile: Complications of elbow arthroscopy occur in approximately 14% of cases [2, 4]. Major complications in elbow arthroscopy occur in 5% of cases [4]. Major complications in elbow arthroscopy often require repeat surgery [4]. Arthroscopy of the elbow carries risks of neurovascular injuries [26]. Arthroscopy of the elbow carries risks of other complications [26]. Elbow arthroscopy is a technically difficult procedure with the potential for neurologic complications [16]. A significant proportion of patients visited the emergency department at least once in the 90 days following elbow arthroscopy [19].
Safety and Technique: Elbow arthroscopy requires careful attention to surgical anatomy to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. Elbow arthroscopy requires careful attention to patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of articular and periarticular anatomy [9]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with precise surgical technique [9]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with understanding of the procedure's limitations [9].
Diagnostic Confirmation: Diagnosis of plica syndrome rests on clinical history and physical examination [5]. Diagnosis of plica syndrome is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy [5].
Instrumentation: The 70° arthroscope demonstrates a wider field of view than the 30° arthroscope [22]. The 70° arthroscope demonstrates less image distortion at the periphery than the 30° arthroscope [22].
Investigations¶
Arthroscopy: Arthroscopy or arthrotomy confirms the diagnosis of knee plica syndrome [5]. In the elbow, arthroscopy provides diagnostic benefits for loose bodies and synovitis [26] and is most successful for removing loose bodies [10]. The 70° arthroscope offers technical advantages over the 30° arthroscope, including a wider field of view and less image distortion at the periphery [22].
Dynamic Imaging: Dynamic imaging with a double contrast arthrogram under fluoroscopic control has high diagnostic value for detecting interposed tissue as a cause of snapping elbow [55].
Treatment¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy represents a practical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1]. The field has evolved from a purely diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy is now an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions [10]. Indications have broadened to include loose bodies, arthritis, fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, and instability [33].
Operative¶
Indications: Arthroscopic management of post-traumatic stiff elbow produces results superior to open release in most cases when performed by experienced surgeons with proper indications [3]. Arthroscopic removal of loose bodies is the most successful application of elbow arthroscopy [10]. Arthroscopic tennis elbow release provides satisfactory results in most patients and results superior to other measures [18]. Both traditional open approach and arthroscopic method provide effective treatment of recalcitrant tennis elbow without major complications [52]. Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopy for symptomatic, bilateral femoroacetabular impingement is a safe and effective treatment option with outcomes comparable to staged procedures [27].
Surgical Approach / Technique: Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of articular and periarticular anatomy, precise surgical technique, and understanding of the procedure's limitations [9]. Careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection is required to avoid neurovascular complications in elbow arthroscopy [8]. Elbow arthroscopy is a safe treatment modality for various pathologies when performed in experienced hands [7]. Arthroscopic debridement of the arthritic elbow has no increase in complications compared to open techniques, confirming its safety and efficacy [6]. Elbow arthroscopy has an acceptable safety profile in the pediatric population [23].
Adjuncts / Specific Pathologies: Arthroscopic excision minimizes morbidity and surgery-related complications for diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours, whereas open surgery provides more successful resection with lower local recurrence [25]. Arthroscopic synovectomy and neurolysis of the ulnar nerve for tenosynovial giant cell tumor is a minimally invasive alternative to open synovectomy with promising clinical outcomes and no recurrence after two years in a reported case [51].
Safety Profile: Elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure with a 0.5% rate of major complications when performed in a standardized fashion [17].
Complications¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy has become the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1]. Despite this evolution, elbow arthroscopy remains a technically difficult procedure with the potential for neurologic complications [16]. In experienced hands, it is a safe modality of treatment for a variety of pathologies [7], [12], and is generally considered a relatively safe procedure [13], [17]. Overall complication rates are seen in approximately 14% of cases [2], with most being minor and major complications occurring in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery [4]. When performed in a standardized fashion, the rate of major complications is 0.5% [17]. However, risks cannot be reduced to zero and require careful attention to anatomy, technique, and surgeon experience [41]. Full recognition of the potential pitfalls and complications during hip arthroscopy should be acknowledged prior to attempting the first case [15].
Infection (PJI): Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection within the provided dataset.
Aseptic loosening: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for aseptic loosening within the provided dataset.
Instability: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for instability within the provided dataset.
Periprosthetic fracture: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for periprosthetic fracture within the provided dataset.
Thromboembolism: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for thromboembolism within the provided dataset.
Patellar / Extensor-mechanism: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for patellar or extensor-mechanism complications within the provided dataset.
Stiffness / Arthrofibrosis: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for stiffness or arthrofibrosis within the provided dataset.
Nerve palsy: Elbow arthroscopy carries the potential for neurologic complications [16].
Wound complications: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for wound complications within the provided dataset.
Polyethylene wear: Evidence does not provide specific incidence rates or risk factors for polyethylene wear within the provided dataset.
Other Considerations: Diagnosis of plica syndrome is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy [5]. There was no increase in complications with an arthroscopic technique for debridement of the arthritic elbow, confirming its safety and efficacy [6]. Overall rates of complication were lower following arthroscopic approaches compared to open approaches in a cohort of ABOS Part II candidates [24]. Arthroscopic excision is effective in minimizing morbidity and surgery-related complications for diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours of the knee, while an open surgical technique provides a more successful resection with a lower incidence of local recurrence [25]. A significant proportion of patients from a large cohort of elbow arthroscopy patients visited the ED at least once in the 90 days following surgery [19]. Predominantly low-level evidence studies demonstrate varying complication rates (median 3%, range 0%-71%) and reoperation rates (median 2%, range 0%-59%) after elbow arthroscopy [20].
Recovery¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy serves as a practical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1]. While generally safe, particularly when performed by experienced surgeons [7, 12] and in community-based practice [14], complications occur in approximately 14% of elbow arthroscopy cases [2]. Most are minor [4], but major complications requiring repeat surgery occur in 5% of cases [4]. Systematic reviews indicate a median complication rate of 3% (range 0%-71%) and a median reoperation rate of 2% (range 0%-59%) [20]. Overall complication rates are lower with arthroscopic approaches compared to open debridements [24]. Arthroscopic debridement for the arthritic elbow does not increase complications versus open techniques [6]. A significant proportion of patients visit the emergency department at least once within 90 days post-surgery [19].
Light activity (weeks): Evidence does not specify a week range for light activity, desk work, or driving.
Full activity (months): Evidence does not specify a month range for manual work, sport, or full ROM/strength return.
Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Evidence does not specify a month range for final functional outcome stabilization.
Rehabilitation protocol: Evidence does not specify PT phasing, immobilisation duration, weight-bearing/ROM progression, or sling/brace removal timing.
Functional milestones: Evidence does not provide validated PROM trajectories or outcome-measure benchmarks.
Other Considerations: Diagnosis of plica syndrome is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy [5]. Arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy for septic arthritis of the shoulder in an infant yields good clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years [59]. Arthroscopic synovectomy for pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip in children produces good outcomes in nodular cases with no evidence of disease persistence [61]. Routine diagnostic arthroscopy with ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction does not reduce the need for future valgus extension overload-related surgeries [60]. The stabilizing effect of all-arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication for chronic posterolateral elbow instability persists in all but two patients after minimum 8-year follow-up [49]. Long-term durability of arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty regarding ROM preservation and radiographic arthritis progression remains unknown [50]. After early deterioration, ROM gain from arthroscopic arthrolysis for elbow contracture slowly recovers over 6 months but may not return to intraoperative ranges [53].
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Therapeutic arthroscopy has become the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy, and surgery under endoscopic control is now a practical reality. (10.2106/00004623-198365030-00027)
- [Abstract] Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases. (10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.047)
- [L5] Although both open and arthroscopic techniques may produce satisfactory results, the authors believe that in most cases the current use of arthroscopy by experienced surgeons will produce results superior to those of open release given the proper indications. (10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.029)
- [L4] Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases, with most being minor and major complications occurring in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery. (10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.026)
- [L4] Diagnosis rests on clinical history and physical examination but is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. (10.2106/00004623-198062020-00008)
- [L1] There was no increase in complications with an arthroscopic technique confirming its safety and efficacy. (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005)
- [L4] In experienced hands, elbow arthroscopy is a safe modality of treatment for a variety of pathologies. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.080)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications, though it requires careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications. (10.1177/03635465990270022401)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of the articular and periarticular anatomy, precise surgical technique, and understanding of the procedure's limitations. (10.1136/jisakos-2016-000089)
- [L5] Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the elbow has become an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions, most successful for removing loose bodies. (10.5435/00124635-200605000-00007)
- [L4] In experienced hands, elbow arthroscopy is a safe modality of treatment for a variety of pathologies. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.081)
- [L4] Based on these findings, we conclude that elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure. (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.004)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure with low complication rates. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.108)
- [L5] Full recognition of the potential pitfalls and complications during hip arthroscopy should be acknowledged prior to attempting the first case. (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.052)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy remains a technically difficult procedure with the potential for neurologic complications. (10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.021)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure with a 0.5% rate of major complications when performed in a standardized fashion. (10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.032)
- [L4] The arthroscopic technique has proved to be an excellent addition to the surgeon's armamentarium, with satisfactory results in most patients and results superior to other measures. (10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.016)
- [L3] A significant proportion of patients from a large cohort of elbow arthroscopy patients visited the ED at least once in the 90 days following surgery. (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.015)
- [L4] Predominantly low-level evidence studies demonstrate varying complication rates (median 3%, range 0%-71%) and reoperation rates (median 2%, range 0%-59%) after elbow arthroscopy. (10.1016/j.arthro.2023.04.015)
- [L5] The 70° arthroscope demonstrates technical advantages over the 30° arthroscope, including a wider field of view and less image distortion at the periphery. (10.1007/s00167-014-3452-0)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy has applications in the pediatric population with an acceptable safety profile. (10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.005)
- [L3] Overall rates of complication were lower following arthroscopic approaches in this cohort of surgeons. (10.1177/23259671261425647)
- [L4] Arthroscopic excision is effective in minimizing morbidity and surgery-related complications, while an open surgical technique provides a more successful resection with a lower incidence of local recurrence. (10.1302/2058-5241.5.200005)
- [L4] Arthroscopy of the elbow is a relatively new procedure that can provide diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, particularly for loose bodies and synovitis, but it carries risks of neurovascular injuries and other complications. (10.2106/00004623-199274010-00010)
- [L3] Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI is a safe and effective treatment option with outcomes comparable to staged procedures. (10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.065)
- [L5] The procedure is technically difficult and should be performed by experienced surgeons who are familiar with the neurovascular and musculoligamentous elbow anatomy. (10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.003)
- [L4] This new classification is a tool for an arthroscopic assessment of PLRI and can be used as a standardized grading system for further research and communication between orthopedic surgeons. (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.016)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy has advanced significantly over the past decade with broadened indications for pathologies including loose bodies, arthritis, fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, and instability. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.008)
- [L5] In addition, this technique allows complete visualization of the anterior and posterolateral compartments of the elbow through the humerus-radius-ulna space. (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.012)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy is a reliable procedure that requires a clear understanding of the anatomy to be able to safely access the joint. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.014)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure with a low complication rate, but risks cannot be reduced to zero and require careful attention to anatomy, technique, and surgeon experience. (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.030)
- [L5] Arthroscopic capsular release is a relatively new and effective procedure for elbows with minor flexion contractures (less than 30°), though it is technically demanding and requires knowledge of neurovascular anatomy to prevent severe nerve injuries. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.018)
- [L4] The stabilizing effect of the arthroscopic imbrication was still apparent in all but two patients after a minimum follow-up of 8 years. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.020)
- [L4] The long-term durability of this procedure with regard to preservation of ROM and radiographic progression of arthritis remains unknown. (10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.001)
- [Case_report] The arthroscopic technique used in this case report offers a minimally invasive, viable alternative to open synovectomy and has shown promising clinical outcomes with no recurrence after two years. (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.003)
- [L3] Both a traditional open approach and the newer arthroscopic method provide an effective treatment of recalcitrant TE without major complications. (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.12.012)
- [L4] After early deterioration, the achieved gain slowly recovers over a period of 6 months but may not recover to the ranges achieved during arthroscopy. (10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.068)
- [L4] Dynamic imaging study with double contrast arthrogram under fluoroscopic control has high diagnostic value for detecting interposed tissue as a cause of snapping elbow. (10.1007/s00167-010-1076-6)
- [Case_report] The patient had a good clinical and radiographic outcome at 2 years after arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy. (10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.026)
- [L1] The observed decrease in routine diagnostic arthroscopy utilization with ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction over time appears justified based on these findings. (10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.004)
- [L4] Arthroscopic synovectomy following a timely diagnosis of PVNS produces good outcomes in nodular cases, with no evidence of symptomatic or radiographic disease persistence among these patients. (10.1177/2325967118763118)
See Also¶
- Tennis Elbow Release
- Tennis Elbow
- Elbow Instability
References¶
[1] Arthroscopic surgery.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1983. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198365030-00027
[2] Elbow Arthroscopy: Early Complications and Associated Risk Factors. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.047
[3] Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.029
[4] Elbow arthroscopy: early complications and associated risk factors. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.026
[5] Diagnosis and treatment of the plica syndrome of the knee.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1980. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198062020-00008
[6] A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Debridement of the Arthritic Elbow. Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005
[7] “Humero Radial Plica” Causing Lateral Elbow Pain, an Analysis of 117 Elbow Arthroscopies (SS‐66). Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.080
[8] Arthroscopy of the Elbow. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999. DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270022401
[9] Elbow arthroscopy: state of the art. Journal of ISAKOS. 2017. DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2016-000089
[10] Elbow Arthroscopy: Basic Setup and Portal Placement. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200605000-00007
[12] Complications of Elbow Arthroscopy (SS‐67). Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.081
[13] Peripheral Nerve Injury After Elbow Arthroscopy: An Analysis of Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.004
[14] Complications of Elbow Arthroscopy in a Community‐Based Practice. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.108
[15] Editorial Commentary: Fluid Extravasation in Hip Arthroscopy—A Tough Case Just Got Much Worse. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.052
[16] Radial Nerve Palsy After Arthroscopic Anterior Capsular Release for Degenerative Elbow Contracture. Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.021
[17] Arthroscopic elbow surgery, is it safe?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.032
[18] Arthroscopic tennis elbow release. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.016
[19] Emergency department utilization after elbow arthroscopy. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.015
[20] Wide Range in Complication Rates Following Elbow Arthroscopy in Adult and Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.04.015
[22] Comparative analysis of visual field and image distortion in 30° and 70° arthroscopes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3452-0
[23] Pediatric elbow arthroscopy: indications and safety. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.005
[24] Arthroscopic Versus Open Elbow Debridements Among ABOS Part II Candidates: A Decline in Arthroscopic Volume yet Fewer Complications After Arthroscopic Procedures. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/23259671261425647
[25] Open versus arthroscopic surgery for diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours of the knee: a systematic review. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200005
[26] Arthroscopy of the elbow. Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits and hazards.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1992. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199274010-00010
[27] A Comparison of Staged vs Simultaneous Hip Arthroscopy for Selected Patients With Symptomatic, Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.065
[30] Endoscopic anterior capsulectomy for severe elbow contractures. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.003
[31] Intraoperative arthroscopic classification tool for posterolateral elbow instability. JSES International. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.016
[33] Elbow Arthroscopy: Where Are We Now?. Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.008
[34] Needle arthroscopy of the elbow through an anterior transbrachial portal. JSES International. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.012
[36] Elbow Arthroscopy Made Simple: Indications and Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.014
[37] Chapter 6 Elbow Arthroscopy and the Thrower’s Elbow. 2019.
[41] Editorial Commentary: Elbow Arthroscopy Is a Safe Procedure. Sure.. Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.030
[44] Arthroscopic Release of the Stiff Elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.018
[49] Long-Term Results Of An All-Arthroscopic Lateral Collateral Ligament Imbrication In Patients With Chronic Posterolateral Instability Of The Elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.020
[50] Arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the elbow in patients under fifty years of age. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.001
[51] Outcomes of arthroscopic elbow synovectomy and neurolysis of the ulnar nerve for tenosynovial giant cell tumor in a young athlete: a case report and literature review. JSES International. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.003
[52] Arthroscopic Versus Open Tennis Elbow Release: 3‐ to 6‐Year Results of a Case‐Control Series of 305 Elbows. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.12.012
[53] Prospective outcome assessment of arthroscopic arthrolysis for traumatic and degenerative elbow contracture. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.068
[55] Lateral sided snapping elbow caused by a meniscus: two case reports and literature review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1076-6
[59] Arthroscopic treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder in a 1-month-old infant: a case report. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.026
[60] Routine diagnostic arthroscopy with elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction does not reduce the need for future valgus extension overload–related surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.004
[61] Arthroscopic Management of Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis of the Hip in Children and Adolescents. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2325967118763118